当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 急救学论文 >

人工肝支持治疗肝衰竭患者感染相关危险因素分析

发布时间:2018-04-07 15:15

  本文选题:肝衰竭 切入点:人工肝支持治疗 出处:《蚌埠医学院》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的:分析人工肝支持治疗肝衰竭患者发生感染的相关危险因素,为临床医师采取有效措施,降低感染率,提高肝衰竭患者生存率提供依据。方法:收集2012年1月至2016年11月蚌埠医学院第一附属医院感染科住院诊断为肝衰竭患者的临床资料,如性别、年龄、肝功能、凝血功能、导管留置时间、是否应用抗生素、是否合并并发症、肝衰竭类型、Child-Pugh评分、MELD评分、外周血白细胞、中性粒细胞计数、血小板计数等。将患者分为人工肝组和非人工肝组,非人工肝组采用内科综合治疗,人工肝组采用内科综合治疗联合人工肝支持治疗。回顾性分析两组疗效和感染差异;进一步将人工肝组分为感染组和非感染组,采用回归分析方法寻找人工肝治疗肝衰竭患者继发感染的相关危险因素。结果:ALSS组ALT、AST、TBIL较基线水平显著下降,CHE、ALB、PTA较基线水平显著上升;非ALSS组ALT、AST、TBIL较基线水平下降,ALB、PTA较基线水平明显上升,差异具有统计学意义。CHE治疗前后的差异无统计学意义。ALSS组ALT、AST、CHE、TBIL、PT、PTA治疗前后下降或上升幅度优于非ALSS组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。ALSS组和非ALSS组好转率分别为53.04%和44.29%,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。36.08%(92/255)的肝衰竭患者出现感染,ALSS组和非ALSS组感染率分别为40.87%(47/115)和32.14%(45/140),两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.085,P0.05)。常见感染部位为下呼吸道(40.17%)、腹腔(27.45%)、上呼吸道(11.76%)、肠道(7.84%)、血流(5.88%)。感染患者中17.39%表现为两部位感染。单因素logistic分析Child-Pugh分级、MELD评分、PTA、预防性应用抗菌素、导管留置时间以及合并并发症是ALSS组肝衰竭患者发生感染的危险因素(OR值分别为1.051、1.019、0.968、0.128、1.114、5.170),多因素logistic回归分析表明合并并发症和导管留置时间是ALSS组感染患者主要危险因素(OR值分别为11.590和1.253)。结论:内科综合治疗能够有效改善肝衰竭患者的肝功能及凝血功能,联合人工肝支持治疗疗效更好;人工肝治疗肝衰竭患者感染率高于未行人工肝治疗者,继发感染是肝衰竭患者预后不佳的重要原因;合并并发症和导管留置时间是人工肝治疗肝衰竭患者感染的独立危险因素。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the risk factors of infection in patients with liver failure treated with artificial liver support, so as to provide evidence for clinicians to take effective measures to reduce the infection rate and improve the survival rate of patients with liver failure.Methods: from January 2012 to November 2016, clinical data of patients with liver failure, such as sex, age, liver function, coagulation function, catheter indwelling time, and whether antibiotics were used, were collected in the infection Department of the first affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College.There were complications, Child-Pugh score and meld score, peripheral blood leukocyte count, neutrophil count, platelet count and so on.The patients were divided into artificial liver group and non-artificial liver group.Retrospective analysis of the two groups of efficacy and infection differences, further divided the artificial liver group into infection group and non-infection group, using regression analysis method to find the artificial liver treatment of liver failure patients secondary infection risk factors.Results compared with the baseline level, the level of TBIL in the ALSS group was significantly lower than that in the baseline level, and that in the non-ALSS group was significantly higher than that in the baseline level, and that in the non-ALSS group was significantly higher than that in the baseline level, and that in the non-ALSS group was significantly higher than that in the baseline level, and that in the non-ALSS group was significantly higher than that in the baseline level.There was no significant difference between before and after treatment. Before and after treatment, the decrease or rise of alt in ALSS group was higher than that in non-#en0# group.The common sites of infection were 40.17 in lower respiratory tract, 27.45 in abdominal cavity, 11.76 in upper respiratory tract, 7.84 in intestinal tract and 5.88 in blood flow.17.39% of the infected patients showed two sites of infection.Single factor logistic analysis of Child-Pugh grading meld score, prophylactic use of antibiotics,The risk factors of hepatic failure in ALSS group were catheter indwelling time and complications. OR value was 1.051v 1.0190.960.1281.1145.170, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that complications and catheter indwelling time were the main risk factors of infection in ALSS group.The OR values were 11.590 and 1.253%, respectively.Conclusion: comprehensive medical treatment can effectively improve the liver function and coagulation function of patients with liver failure, and the effect of combined artificial liver support therapy is better, the infection rate of patients with artificial liver failure is higher than that of patients without artificial liver therapy.Secondary infection is an important cause of poor prognosis in patients with liver failure and complications and catheter indwelling time are independent risk factors for the treatment of infection in patients with liver failure.
【学位授予单位】:蚌埠医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R575.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 黄艺;;人工肝支持系统留置静脉导管相关性感染的护理对策分析[J];中外医学研究;2016年09期

2 郑彩娟;尚华;付惠杰;郑玉芬;;人工肝深静脉导管的感染因素及预防[J];医疗装备;2015年15期

3 臧红;刘鸿凌;郝玉清;温斌;朱冰;刘婉姝;辛绍杰;游绍莉;;慢加急性肝衰竭并发感染的危险因素及对近期预后的影响[J];传染病信息;2015年05期

4 黄旭明;黄肇权;巫晓华;汪利华;瞿长春;;肝硬化患者Child-Pugh评分与菌血症发生的相关性[J];海南医学;2015年12期

5 张鑫;甘巧蓉;王宁;潘晨;;HBV相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后的影响因素[J];临床肝胆病杂志;2015年05期

6 刘颖;韩德辉;邵晓红;王洪;;深静脉置管患者感染危险因素分析[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2014年13期

7 臧红;辛绍杰;;终末期肝病相关并发症的管理和规范诊治[J];传染病信息;2014年02期

8 朱冰;欧阳灿;刘鸿凌;臧红;荣义辉;万志红;游绍莉;辛绍杰;;C反应蛋白和降钙素原检测在乙肝肝衰竭患者中应用的临床意义[J];中华实验和临床病毒学杂志;2014年02期

9 李宗良;赖春颜;梁敏锋;马均宝;;肝衰竭并发感染患者的临床特征分析[J];中国热带医学;2014年02期

10 张名芳;牧小亚;;人工肝血浆置换治疗重型肝炎医院感染15例分析及预防[J];山西医药杂志;2014年03期



本文编号:1719730

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jjyx/1719730.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c03db***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com