当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 急救学论文 >

单操作孔和3孔电视胸腔镜治疗自发性气胸疗效分析

发布时间:2018-05-21 13:17

  本文选题:单操作孔 + 胸腔镜 ; 参考:《延安大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的:对单操作孔胸腔镜和3孔胸腔镜治疗自发性气胸作前瞻性对照研究,了解单操作孔胸腔镜的临床应用价值。方法:收集2010年1月至2013年1月间的自发性气胸病人50例,利用单双数抽签法将病人分为两组,电脑随机分配数字,奇数归为单操作孔治疗组,而偶数则归为3孔治疗组。为了避免年龄偏差对研究的影响,我们选择了16至55岁之间的病人;并排除了术前检查为多发性肺大泡患者。数据采用医学统计软件PEMS3.1处理,计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用卡方检验。结果:两组患者术中麻醉都比较满意;单操作孔与传统标准胸腔镜组相比,手术由于少了一个操作孔,切口总长度明显缩短(P=0.0001);两组在术中出血量上无明显显统计学意义(P=0.5932);术后引流量上,单操作孔治疗组均数为308.8±87.10ml,3孔治疗组均数为401.6±118.35ml,具有明显统计学差异(P=0.0027),具体原因可能是多一个操作孔引起胸壁渗出增多。术后疼痛调查,在伴有明显疼痛、微痛伤口麻木者的总数上,单操作孔治疗组明显少于3孔治疗组(P=0.0039),说明在对胸壁的影响方面,单操作孔优于3孔胸腔镜,有统计学意义。其他术后指标在手术时间、住院时间等方面两者无明显区别。结论:单操作孔胸腔镜可以取得与3孔胸腔镜一样的手术效果,而且更微创,,能够提高患者的术后生活质量。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the clinical value of single-hole thoracoscopy and 3-hole thoracoscopy in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Methods: 50 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax from January 2010 to January 2013 were divided into two groups by single and even drawing lots. To avoid the effect of age bias on the study, we selected patients between 16 and 55 years of age and excluded preoperative examinations of multiple alveoli. The data were processed by PEMS3.1, t-test was used for metrological data, and chi-square test was used for counting data. Results: the anesthesia was satisfactory in both groups, the single operating hole was one less than that in the traditional standard thoracoscopic group. The total length of incision was significantly shortened by 0.0001m, there was no significant difference in blood loss during operation between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in the volume of bleeding between the two groups. The mean value of single hole treatment group was 308.8 卤87.10 ml / ml, the mean value of the treatment group was 401.6 卤118.35 ml, there was significant difference between the two groups. The specific reason might be that more than one operating hole could cause the increase of chest wall exudation. In the total number of patients with obvious pain and numbness, the single hole treatment group was significantly less than 3 hole treatment group (P 0. 0039), which indicated that the single operation hole was superior to 3 hole thoracoscopy in the influence of chest wall. There was no significant difference in operative time and hospital stay between the two groups. Conclusion: single-hole thoracoscopy can achieve the same effect as 3-hole thoracoscopy, and it is more minimally invasive and can improve the postoperative quality of life of the patients.
【学位授予单位】:延安大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:R655

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 初向阳;薛志强;张连斌;侯晓斌;马克峰;;单操作孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术的初步报道[J];中国肺癌杂志;2010年01期

2 王拥军;张澍田;;微创治疗的新纪元——从腹腔镜胆囊切除术到经自然孔道胃肠壁外内镜手术[J];临床消化病杂志;2007年02期

3 丁国强;张瑛;白舒;刘鸿运;张大勇;于四海;;经济欠发达地区电视胸腔镜手术287例次分析[J];微创医学;2010年02期

4 王俊,李剑锋,张利华,范秀军,陈鸿义;胸腔镜辅以胸壁小切口的全肺切除术[J];中华胸心血管外科杂志;1998年04期

5 王俊;杨帆;;我国胸部微创外科的发展现状和方向[J];中华医学杂志;2006年33期

6 李运;李剑锋;刘军;姜冠潮;赵辉;王俊;;电视硬质气管镜治疗大气道良性肿瘤[J];中国微创外科杂志;2005年12期

7 王俊;刘彦国;;胸腔镜外科——传统胸外科之“升级版”[J];中国微创外科杂志;2010年02期

8 郭建极;陈铭伍;冼磊;廖绪强;郭永宽;刘涛;;胸外科研究生胸腔镜手术的培养与训练[J];中国现代医生;2012年32期



本文编号:1919350

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/jjyx/1919350.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8a6b7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com