自锁托槽与传统结扎翼托槽对牙根吸收影响的系统评价

发布时间：2018-04-04 13:37

  本文选题：正畸治疗　切入点：自锁托槽　出处：《山东大学学报(医学版)》2014年01期

【摘要】：目的系统评价正畸治疗过程中,自锁托槽与结扎翼托槽对牙根吸收程度的影响。方法计算机检索相关期刊论文、万方数据库、中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库、Cochrane library临床随机对照试验库、Medline数据库、PubMed、Embase数据库,筛选出比较自锁托槽组与结扎翼托槽组对牙根吸收影响的文献,检索时间均从建库至2013年6月30日。由两位研究者独立评价纳入研究的质量并提取资料,采用RevMan5.2.1软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入3个研究。Meta分析结果显示,自锁托槽组与传统结扎翼托槽组的根外吸收量在上颌中切牙[MD=-0.20,95%CI(-1.45~1.05),P=0.75]、上颌侧切牙[MD=0.53,95%CI(-0.50~1.56),P=0.31]、下颌中切牙[MD=-0.01,95%CI(-0.22~0.20),P=0.92]和下颌侧切牙[MD=-0.31,95%CI(-1.33~0.71),P=0.55]均差异无统计学意义。结论矫治器类型可能并不是影响牙根吸收的主要因素,正畸医生可根据自锁托槽和传统结扎翼托槽各自的优缺点并结合患者错牙合畸形的具体情况选用托槽。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the effects of self-locking brackets and ligated pterygoid brackets on root resorption during orthodontic treatment.Methods Chinese Journal full-text database, Wanfang database, Chinese sci-tech journal database and Chinese biomedical literature database were searched by computer. Cochrane library clinical randomized controlled trial database was used to search Medline database.The effects of self-locking bracket group and ligated pterygoid bracket group on root resorption were compared. The retrieval time was from the construction of the database to June 30, 2013.The quality of the study was evaluated by two researchers and the data were extracted. Meta analysis was carried out with RevMan5.2.1 software.缁撴灉鏈，

本文编号：1710179