颈总动脉血流动力学参数判断颈内动脉狭窄程度的价值
发布时间:2018-02-28 10:50
本文关键词: 颈内动脉狭窄 颈总动脉 血流动力学 出处:《山东医药》2017年36期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:目的探讨颈总动脉血流动力学参数判断颈内动脉狭窄程度的价值。方法选择单侧颈内动脉中度及以上狭窄或闭塞、对侧同名动脉无狭窄或轻度狭窄者255例,根据颈内动脉狭窄程度分为颈内动脉中度狭窄98例(中度组)、重度狭窄89例(重度组)、闭塞68例(闭塞组)。分别测量各组颈总动脉收缩期血流峰值(PSV)、舒张末期血流速度(EDV)、阻力指数(RI)、血管内径(D)、血流量(BFV),并分析各指标与颈内动脉狭窄程度的关系。结果重度组和闭塞组患侧颈总动脉PSV、EDV、BFV明显低于同组健侧颈总动脉,RI明显高于同组健侧颈总动脉(P均0.05)。重度组和闭塞组患侧颈总动脉PSV、EDV、BFV明显低于中度组患侧颈总动脉,RI明显高于中度组患侧颈总动脉(P均0.05)。相关分析显示,颈内动脉狭窄程度与颈总动脉EDV、BFV呈负相关关系(r分别为-0.893、-0.723,P均0.01),与颈总动脉RI呈正相关关系(r=0.853,P0.05),与颈总动脉PSV、D无明显相关性(r分别为0.536、0.324,P均0.05)。结论颈总动脉EDV、BFV可用于评价颈内动脉狭窄程度,尤其是颈内动脉闭塞。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the value of common carotid artery hemodynamic parameters in judging the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis. Methods 255 cases of unilateral internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion without stenosis or slight stenosis of the contralateral artery with the same name were selected. According to the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis, 98 cases of internal carotid artery stenosis (moderate group), 89 cases of severe stenosis (severe group) and 68 cases of occlusion (occlusion group) were divided into two groups. The blood flow velocity, resistance index (RI), blood flow volume (BFV) and blood flow volume (BFV) were analyzed. Results the BFV of common carotid artery in severe group and occlusion group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the RI of common carotid artery in normal side was significantly higher than that in control group. In the same group, the normal common carotid artery (P < 0.05), the common carotid artery (PSV) EDV (BFV) in the severe group and the occlusion group (P < 0.05) were significantly lower than those in the moderate group (P < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between the degree of stenosis of internal carotid artery and EDVV BFV of common carotid artery (r = -0.893t -0.723), a positive correlation with RI of common carotid artery (r = 0.853N, P 0.05), and no significant correlation with common carotid artery (PSV) D, respectively (r = 0.5360.3244P = 0.050.Conclusion EDV BFV of common carotid artery can be used to evaluate common carotid artery. Degree of stenosis of internal carotid artery, Especially internal carotid artery occlusion.
【作者单位】: 山东中医药大学附属医院;兖矿集团总医院;
【分类号】:R743.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李丽;张旭;;应用彩色多普勒超声对颈内动脉狭窄的诊断[J];中国现代医生;2009年28期
2 吴明晓;郭发金;蒋文莉;韩秀婕;;三维能量多普勒成像诊断老年人颈内动脉狭窄的应用价值[J];中华医学超声杂志(电子版);2012年04期
3 马志忠,朱克,匡培根;颈内动脉狭窄的临床分析[J];北京医学;1984年02期
4 焦力群,凌锋,张鸿祺,缪中荣,董白晶,张鹏,宋庆斌,张洋;双侧颈内动脉狭窄的侧枝循环特点分析[J];医学影像学杂志;2004年11期
5 孙晓培,许晶,宋凡,韩杰,胡志云,梁战华;频发短暂性脑缺血发作与颈内动脉狭窄关系的研究[J];中国脑血管病杂志;2005年05期
6 李志丹;孙华山;;颈内动脉狭窄支架前后血压控制3例探讨[J];中国社区医师(医学专业半月刊);2008年21期
7 曹骅;石正洪;郭佳;刘倩;;彩超与血管造影对颅外段颈内动脉狭窄诊断的相关性比较[J];兰州大学学报(医学版);2009年04期
8 张玉秋;胡丽兴;杨丽娜;;颈内动脉狭窄与糖尿病视网膜病变的相关性[J];临床眼科杂志;2010年05期
9 王,
本文编号:1546989
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/shenjingyixue/1546989.html
最近更新
教材专著