当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

肋软骨切取术后胸廓畸形预防方法的生物力学研究

发布时间:2018-01-19 05:34

  本文关键词: 切取肋软骨 胸廓畸形 再植 动物模型 生物力学 出处:《北京协和医学院》2017年博士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:研究背景自体肋软骨是整形外科常用的支架填充材料,广泛用于耳、鼻和颌面部整形。耳再造手术所需软骨量较大,患者年龄较小,术后胸廓畸形发生率较高,因此广受医患双方的关注。为改善肋软骨切取术后供区形态,Kawanabe等提出了改良肋软骨切取法,并宣称术后供区完全无畸形。但是,尽管有学者完全按照Kawanabe的方法切取肋软骨,术后半年仍会出现明显的胸廓畸形,且生长发育期儿童尤为明显。因此,探索预防肋软骨切取术后胸廓畸形的方法仍是目前临床上研究的热点。根据文献报道,生物力学因素可能是引起胸廓畸形的重要原因之一。但是,目前研究主要关注于软骨组织的再生,而生物力学方面的研究较少。从生物力学角度对不同的干预措施进行研究将有助于为肋软骨切取术后胸廓畸形的预防提供新的思路和方法。研究目的1.建立肋软骨缺损修复的动物模型。评估不同的方式(回植软骨碎块、回植软骨条、不回植软骨)处理对肋软骨切取术后早期肋软骨缺损修复段形态和组织结构的影响。2.评估不同的方式(回植软骨碎块、回植软骨条、不回植软骨)处理对肋软骨切取术后早期缺损修复段生物力学特性的影响。3.评估肋软骨切取术后半年内通过坚持佩戴弹性胸带限制呼吸幅度,是否能够降低肋软骨切取术后胸廓畸形的发生率。研究方法1.新西兰大白兔12只,随机分为两组。于双侧第5、6肋分别切取长15mm肋软骨,保留供区软骨膜完整并缝合关闭软骨膜腔。左右两侧分别以不回植软骨/回植软骨碎块(第5肋)、回植软骨条/回植软骨碎块(第6肋)处理。回植量约为原软骨量的1/4。回植软骨碎块/软骨条的直径约为0.5mm。术后16周、24周分两批处死动物取材。测量比较修复段的外观形态和组织结构。2.采用三点弯曲试验对缺损修复段的生物力学进行评估。比较不同处理方法对缺损修复段生物力学性能的影响。3.通过病史采集和体格检查,对肋软骨切取术后1年左右来院接受耳再造第三期手术的患者的胸廓形态进行评估。按术后半年内是否坚持佩戴胸带分别统计患者胸廓畸形发生率并进行比较。研究结果1.建立了肋软骨缺损修复的动物模型。术后16、24周,同一水平(第5或第6肋)缺损修复段的平均宽度在左右两侧均无显著差异(P0.05)。而同侧、同一水平的缺损修复段术后24周较术后16周宽度窄,两者差异具有统计学显著性(P0.05)。供区新生组织以纤维组织为主,未见透明软骨再生。不同方式处理的缺损修复段的组织结构存在明显差异。2.术后16、24周,各缺损修复段的弹性模量均显著低于正常软骨。未回植软骨的修复段弯曲弹性模量显著高于回植软骨碎块的修复段;回植软骨条的修复段弯曲弹性模量显著高于回植软骨碎块的修复段(P0.05)。在应力应变关系和应力松弛方面,未回植软骨的修复段优于回植软骨碎块的修复段,但不及回植软骨条的修复段。3.共38名患者符合条件进入研究。按要求坚持佩戴胸带半年的患者术后胸廓畸形的发生率(64.7%)低于未按要求佩戴胸带的患者(95.2%)。两者差异具有统计学显著性(P=0.031)。研究结论1.肋软骨切取术后早期(半年内),肋软骨缺损处主要以纤维组织修复。纤维组织随时间而成熟萎缩。回植的自体肋软骨能够成活,但无法证明其能诱导透明软骨再生。按原肋软骨体积的1/4回植自体软骨,缺损修复段尺寸与是否回植软骨或回植软骨的形态无关。但是,是否回植和回植不同形状的自体软骨对修复段组织结构有明显影响,可能是造成生物力学性能差异的原因。2.肋软骨切取术后早期(半年内),肋软骨缺损修复段的生物力学性能显著低于正常软骨,但随时间会逐渐提高。回植自体软骨碎块(原体积的1/4)无助于提高供区的生物力学性能。回植自体软骨条(原体积的1/4)虽不能达到正常肋软骨的生物力学性能,但明显优于未回植和回植软骨碎块组。3.坚持佩戴弹性胸带适当限制呼吸幅度,通过减小呼吸肌和胸腔负压对供区段的牵拉力,能够降低肋软骨切取术后胸廓畸形的发生率。
[Abstract]:The research background of autogenous rib cartilage stent is plastic surgery commonly used filler material, widely used in ear, nose and facial plastic surgery. Ear reconstruction surgery required a large amount of cartilage, patients with younger age, higher incidence of postoperative chest deformity, so popular with both doctors and patients concerned. For cutting area form postoperatively for the improvement of costal cartilage Kawanabe, put forward a modified rib cartilage cut method, and declared that the donor site after surgery without deformity. However, although some scholars completely according to the method of Kawanabe cut costal cartilage, after half a year still obvious chest deformity, and the growth and development of children is particularly obvious. Therefore, to explore the focus of prevention of costal cartilage is the current clinical research methods of chest deformity were cut. According to the literatures, the biomechanical factors may be one of the important causes of thoracic deformity. However, current research is mainly focused on the regeneration of cartilage, The biomechanical research less. From the angle of biomechanics of different intervention measures for research will be helpful for the costal cartilage incision chest deformity prevention to provide new ideas and methods for research purposes. 1. to establish the animal model of rib cartilage defect repair. Evaluation of different ways (backgrafting cartilage fragments, backgrafting cartilage, cartilage) cut back with different ways to assess the impact section morphology and histological structure of early rib cartilage defect repair.2. after surgery of the rib cartilage (backgrafting cartilage fragments, backgrafting cartilage, no cartilage replantation) cut after surgery treatment effect of biomechanical characteristics of early repair of defect assessment.3. the first half of the costal cartilage after operation through the chest with a stick to wearing elastic limit of respiratory rate of the rib cartilage, can reduce the incidence of rib cartilage incision chest deformity. Methods: 1. 12 New Zealand rabbits were randomly. Divided into two groups. In the bilateral 5,6 ribs were harvested for 15mm long costal cartilage, reserved for cartilage membrane integrity and closure of the cartilage membrane cavity. Both sides were in replantation replantation / cartilage cartilage fragments (fifth rib), backgrafting cartilage / backgrafting cartilage fragments (sixth ribs). Replantation is about the original amount of cartilage 1/4. backgrafting cartilage cartilage fragments / a diameter of about 16 weeks after 0.5mm., 24 weeks, two batches were collected. Animal morphology and microstructure of the.2. measurement repair section by three point bending test of biomechanics of defect segments are evaluated. Comparing method some biomechanical properties of different repair defects affect.3. by history and physical examination, the costal cartilage for 1 years after surgery or to the hospital for chest ear reconstruction of the third stage were evaluated. According to postoperative half year whether to insist on wearing a chest belt were measured Patients with thoracic deformity rate were compared. Results 1. established an animal model of rib cartilage defect repair. After 16,24 weeks, the same level (fifth or sixth ribs) the average width of defect repair section on the left and right sides showed no significant difference (P0.05). And the same side of the same level, defect repair section 16 weeks after surgery 24 weeks after surgery is narrow, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The donor tissue mainly by fibrous tissue, no regeneration of hyaline cartilage. The organizational structure of different treatment defect segments of 16,24 weeks significantly after.2., the elastic modulus of each segment were defect repair was significantly lower than that of normal cartilage. Not to repair cartilage graft segment flexural modulus was significantly higher than that of repair segment replantation of cartilage fragments; replantation repair section bending elastic modulus of cartilage was significantly higher than that of the repair segment replantation of cartilage fragments (P0.05). The stress and strain The relationship between stress and relaxation, repair without replantation of cartilage repair section is better than that of the replantation of cartilage fragments, but less than the period of replantation of cartilage repair.3. a total of 38 eligible patients entered the study. According to the requirements of the first half of the stick to wearing chest strap in patients with thoracic malformations (64.7%) according to the below asked to wear a chest belt of patients (95.2%). The difference was statistically significant (P=0.031). Conclusion: 1. costal cartilage for early postoperative (six months), rib cartilage defects mainly by fibrous tissue. The fibrous tissue with time and mature atrophy. Autologous costal cartilage graft in the back can survive, but not that which can induce hyaline cartilage regeneration. According to the original cartilage volume of 1/4 implant autologous cartilage defect repair segment size has nothing to do with the replantation of cartilage or backgrafting cartilage morphology. However, whether autologous cartilage replantation and replantation of different shapes on the repair section There is obvious influence of organizational structure, may be caused by the difference of.2. biomechanical properties of costal cartilage for early postoperative (six months), the biomechanical properties of rib cartilage defect repair segment was significantly lower than that of the normal cartilage, but over time will gradually improve. Replantation of autologous cartilage fragments (original volume 1/4) can not improve the biomechanical properties for area. Replantation of autogenous cartilage (the original volume 1/4) biomechanical properties cannot attain normal cartilage, but not significantly better than the replantation and replantation of cartilage fragments.3. insist on wearing elastic chest strap appropriate to limit the amplitude of respiration, by reducing respiratory muscle tension and pleural pressure on Supply section, can occur to reduce the rate of rib cartilage incision chest deformity.

【学位授予单位】:北京协和医学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R622

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 詹朝双;多肋软骨1例[J];中国临床解剖学杂志;2000年02期

2 徐志诚,胡廷泽,张银柱,刘文英;肋软骨膜对肋软骨再生与塑形影响的实验研究[J];中国修复重建外科杂志;2001年06期

3 向子云,周伟生,罗良平,肖树恺,韦日宇;多层螺旋CT肋软骨成像及成人肋软骨形态学研究(英文)[J];中国现代医学杂志;2004年12期

4 何卫,向子云,罗良平,陈时洪;螺旋CT肋软骨成像的临床应用[J];中国医师杂志;2005年06期

5 吴仕龙;王国平;;多层螺旋CT后处理重建对肋软骨创伤断裂诊断的应用价值[J];浙江创伤外科;2009年04期

6 朱功升;;多排螺旋CT后处理技术对肋软骨的显示价值[J];医药论坛杂志;2011年01期

7 朱纪吾;过建生;;肋软骨钙化类型与性别的关系[J];南通大学学报(医学版);1982年03期

8 朱纪吾,过建生;肋软骨钙化类型与性别的关系[J];临床应用解剖学杂志;1984年01期

9 方炳刚,刘承伟;对称性第三肋骨及肋软骨分叉成环一例[J];广东解剖学通报;1989年01期

10 赵炳章;葛兆茹;盖金芳;尚隋阳;赵庆英;李华东;;400例胸片肋软骨钙化分析[J];泰山医学院学报;1990年03期

相关会议论文 前5条

1 崔林;李光绍;金德山;罗昌福;李相伍;;造型骨架中肋软骨制作新方法[A];全国解剖学技术学术会议论文集[C];2007年

2 李晓松;;肋软骨磁共振扫描方法[A];2010中华医学会影像技术分会第十八次全国学术大会论文集[C];2010年

3 刘芳芳;房居高;;兔肋软骨细胞的分离及体外培养[A];中华医学会第十次全国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学术会议论文汇编(上)[C];2007年

4 李凤琪;沈健;;多排螺旋CT低剂量扫描技术对未骨化肋软骨损伤的诊断价值[A];2012年浙江省放射学术年会论文集[C];2012年

5 富渭鑫;;3种腐败肋软骨DNA提取方法的比较[A];中国法医学理论与实践创新成果精选——全国第九次法医学术交流会论文集[C];2013年

相关博士学位论文 前4条

1 康深松;应用低剂量多层螺旋CT评估肋软骨发育指导低龄儿童耳廓再造[D];山东大学;2015年

2 郭荣;以颗粒软骨构建定型移植体的实验研究[D];第二军医大学;2015年

3 韩景健;肋软骨切取术后胸廓畸形预防方法的生物力学研究[D];北京协和医学院;2017年

4 杨庆华;不同年龄组肋软骨生物力学性能及在耳郭再造术中的意义[D];中国协和医科大学;2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 聂佩;正常肋软骨64层螺旋CT研究[D];青岛大学;2010年

2 李崇照;肋软骨三维CT重建在成人耳郭再造中的应用[D];北京协和医学院;2015年

3 光君;自体肋软骨碎屑回植对肋软骨供区修复后生物力学性能影响的实验研究[D];第四军医大学;2015年

4 丁永清;TGF-β1对自体移植肋软骨增殖及代谢的作用[D];复旦大学;2014年

5 郭碧云;健康肋软骨生物力学和组织学特性增龄化研究[D];北京工业大学;2007年

6 姜珊;兔肋软骨膜对肋软骨移植后生物力学性能影响的研究[D];青岛大学;2012年

7 李先慧;自体软骨碎屑回植对肋软骨修复再生影响的实验研究[D];第四军医大学;2010年

8 王锐锋;防止猪肋软骨弯曲变形方法的研究及肋软骨在综合鼻整形中的临床应用[D];中南大学;2013年

9 何茂文;全耳廓立体肋软骨支架植入全耳再造术的研究[D];山东大学;2005年

10 单晶;IGF-Ⅰ凝胶对自体移植带软骨膜肋软骨增殖及代谢的作用[D];复旦大学;2010年



本文编号:1442886

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1442886.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户482dd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com