当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

经椎板间入路全内镜手术治疗钙化型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效观察

发布时间:2018-03-04 10:29

  本文选题:腰椎间盘突出症 切入点:钙化型 出处:《遵义医学院》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:目的:探讨经椎板间入路全内镜手术(Full endoscopic technique,FET)治疗钙化型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:收集我院脊柱外科从2014年8至2016年11月收治钙化型腰椎间盘突出症的患者15例,采用经椎板间入路全内镜手术治疗,记录患者手术时间、术中出血量、术中并发症、术后复发及术后住院时间等情况,随访6个月,分别比较患者术前与术后1d、术后3个月及术后6个月的功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index,ODI)、视觉模拟评分(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS),采用术后3个月MacNab改良的疗效评价评估手术疗效,所有患者均行腰椎正侧位片、腰椎电子计算机断层扫描(Computed tomography,CT)及磁共振成像(Magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)检查。结果:本组病例中,手术时间在77-101分钟,平均手术时间为88分钟,术中无明显出血,所有病例均在内镜下顺利完成,无术中并发症的发生,随访至今所有病例无一例出现术后复发,术后住院时间为2-3天;术前ODI指数为82.5±5.0,术后1天、术后3个月、6个月ODI指数分别为27.1±3.4、24.1±3.5、22.4±2.5,术前ODI指数分别与术后1天、3个月及6个月ODI指数比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),术后1天ODI指数分别与术后3个月及术后6个月ODI指数比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);术前VAS评分为7.8±0.7,术后1天、术后3个月、术后6个月VAS评分分别为2.5±0.7、2.0±0.5、1.5±0.5,术前VAS评分分别与术后1天、术后3个月及6个月VAS评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),术后1天VAS评分分别与术后3个月及术后6个月VAS评分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);术后3月根据改良MacNab标准疗效评价,优12例、良2例、可1例、差0例,优良率93.3%(14/15);术后CT及MRI提示突出钙化的椎间盘组织被切除。结论:经椎板间入路全内镜手术治疗钙化型腰椎间盘突出症具有短期疗效确切、出血量少、手术时间短、并发症少、术后康复快等特点。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the clinical effect of full endoscopic technique (FET) through interlaminar approach in the treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation. Methods: from 2014 to November 2016, 15 patients with calcified lumbar disc herniation in our hospital were collected. Patients were treated with total endoscopy via interlaminar approach. The time of operation, blood loss, complications, postoperative recurrence and postoperative hospital stay were recorded and followed up for 6 months. Oswestry Disability index index (Oswestry Disability index) and visual analogue score (VAS) were compared between preoperative and postoperative 1 day, 3 months after operation and 6 months after operation respectively. Three months after operation, the modified MacNab was used to evaluate the outcome of the operation. All the patients were given Lumbar Lumbar anterior and lateral radiographs. Results: the operation time was 77-101 minutes, the average operation time was 88 minutes, there was no obvious bleeding during the operation, all cases were successfully completed under endoscope. No intraoperative complications occurred, no recurrence occurred in all cases, the postoperative hospitalization time was 2-3 days, the preoperative ODI index was 82.5 卤5.0, and the postoperative ODI index was 1 day after operation. The ODI index at 3 months and 6 months after operation was 27.1 卤3.4 卤3.5 卤22.4 卤2.5, respectively. The ODI index of preoperative ODI was significantly higher than that of 1 day, 3 months and 6 months after operation (P 0.05). The ODI index of 1 day after operation was compared with that of 3 months after operation and 6 months after operation. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), the preoperative VAS score was 7.8 卤0.7, the VAS score at 1 day, 3 months after operation and 6 months after operation was 2.5 卤0.7 卤0.5 卤0.5, respectively. The VAS score before operation was compared with that at 1 day, 3 months and 6 months after operation, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), the VAS score on the 1st day after operation was significantly higher than that at 3 months and 6 months after operation (P 0.05), and on March, according to the modified MacNab standard, 12 cases were excellent, 2 cases were good, 1 case was fair. After operation, CT and MRI showed that calcified intervertebral disc was excised. Conclusion: the treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation by total endoscopy via interlaminar approach is effective in the short term, with less bleeding and shorter operation time. Few complications and quick recovery after operation.
【学位授予单位】:遵义医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R687.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 宋红星;沈惠良;高利;张庆明;;中药配合手术减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症[J];北京中医药;2010年07期

2 陈孔冠,林深镇,郑钦洪;早期手术减压防治骨筋膜室综合征[J];汕头大学医学院学报;1998年S1期

3 苏克江,高宗恩,安荣彪;手术减压治疗恶性大脑中动脉供血区梗死有效,证据不足,还是对传统思维的挑战?[J];国外医学(脑血管疾病分册);2005年08期

4 李义凯,郑清波;手术减压对腰椎管狭窄合并糖尿病的疗效(译)[J];中国中医骨伤科;1995年05期

5 唐亮;应月强;;腹腔间隔室综合征手术减压的进展[J];现代诊断与治疗;2012年01期

6 潘丽华;姜秀珍;段亚丽;;早期手术减压及甲基强地松龙冲击治疗急性脊髓损伤围手术期的护理[J];中国康复;2011年02期

7 李永津;许鸿智;陈博来;宁飞鹏;;老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症非手术治疗与手术治疗疗效比较[J];南方医科大学学报;2011年01期

8 高琦珂;范秋贵;郭殿武;王晋全;;慢性压迫性颈脊髓病30例再次手术原因分析[J];基层医学论坛;2010年02期

9 贾连顺 ,李家顺;腰神经根压迫症及手术减压[J];第二军医大学学报;1988年06期

10 马洪海;蔡飞;万年宇;;退变性腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗[J];海军医学;1993年S1期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 张强;马华松;鲍磊;陈晓明;陈志明;周建伟;汪东;马晓明;邵燕翔;肖曦;邹德威;;手术减压时间对外伤性颈脊髓损伤的治疗作用[A];第十九届中国康协肢残康复学术年会论文选集[C];2010年

2 田纪伟;袁文;;颈椎后纵韧带骨化症手术并发症的探讨[A];全国骨科临床研究新进展研讨会暨学习班论文集[C];2006年

3 田纪伟;赵庆华;王雷;;颈椎后纵韧带骨化症手术并发症探讨[A];第八届全国脊柱脊髓损伤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 高家骏;不手术为何也能治腰椎管狭窄[N];健康报;2005年

2 冯立中 张良英;不能让病人失望[N];安徽日报;2005年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 李涛;急性重型颅脑损伤不同手术时机疗效分析的研究[D];新疆医科大学;2016年

2 麦麦提热夏提·合力力;腰椎间盘突出复发的手术治疗效果及其影响因素分析[D];浙江大学;2016年

3 刘成珠;手术减压对大鼠脊髓撞击并压迫模型的神经细胞自噬与凋亡影响的实验研究[D];南昌大学;2016年

4 林文波;经椎板间入路全内镜手术治疗钙化型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效观察[D];遵义医学院;2017年



本文编号:1565306

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1565306.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a78e5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com