当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

Meek皮肤移植与微粒皮肤移植修复大面积深度烧伤创面效果与临床应用价值的Meta分析

发布时间:2018-03-26 08:07

  本文选题:烧伤创面 切入点:Meek植皮 出处:《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:背景:大面积深度烧伤病人大部分皮肤被破坏,烧伤创面暴露于外界,急需自体皮肤移植,但这类病人的自体移植皮源匮乏,Meek植皮与微粒皮植皮是救治这类烧伤病人的主要手段,近十年以来,关于Meek植皮术的临床疗效陆续被报道,但是与微粒皮植皮的临床对照研究的优劣势存在争议,这些研究大部分样本量小,缺乏说服力。目的:Meek植皮术与微粒皮植皮术在修复大面积深度烧伤创面的临床疗效及应用价值进行系统性评价。方法:用计算机以“Meek micrografting technique”AND“microskin graft methods”等为检索词检索PubMed(1990/2016-10)、Ovid(1966/2016-10)、Elsevier(1988/2016-10)、SPRINGER(1995/2016-10)、The Cochrane Library(1978/2016-10)数据库,以“Meek植皮”和“微粒皮”及“烧伤/burn”为关键检索词检索万方数据库(1982/2016)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(1979/2016)和中国知网数据库(CNKI,1979/2016),并挑选并收集与Meek植皮术与微粒皮植皮术相关治疗大面积深度烧伤创面的临床对照研究(CCT)。评价纳入研究的文献质量,关键资料收集后,使用RevMan 5.1软件行Meta分析。结果与结论:共纳入8个临床对照研究,包含302例大面积烧伤患者。相比于微粒皮植皮组,Meek植皮组在皮片存活率显著增加,在创面愈合时间、皮片融合时间、手术操作时间及1%烧伤面积治疗费用均明显降低,表明Meek植皮术比微粒皮植皮术更能明显增加皮片存活率并促进创面愈合,缩短手术操作时间,并且减少治疗费用,在临床应用价值更加有优势。
[Abstract]:Background: large area deep burn patients are mostly damaged, the burn wounds are exposed to the outside world, and autologous skin transplantation is urgently needed. However, Meek skin grafts and microskin grafts are the main methods to treat these burn patients. In the past ten years, the clinical effects of Meek skin grafting have been reported one after another. But there is controversy about the merits and demerits of clinical comparative studies with microskin grafts, most of which are small in size. Objective: to evaluate systematically the clinical efficacy and application value of Meek Meek skin grafting and microskin skin grafting in the repair of large area deep burn wounds. Methods: the computer was used to search the database of the Cochrane Library 1978-10 using "Meek micrografting technique" AND "microskin graft methods". Using "Meek skin grafting" and "Particle skin" and "Burn / Burn" as the key keywords to search Wanfang Database / 1982 / 2016, Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database / 1979 / 2016) and China knowledge Network Database to select and collect the images of Meek skin grafting and Particle skin grafting. A clinical controlled study on the treatment of large area deep burn wounds by Guan. Evaluation of the quality of literature included in the study. After the key data were collected, Meta analysis was performed with RevMan 5.1 software. Results and conclusion: eight clinical controlled studies were conducted, including 302 patients with large area burn. The survival rate of skin grafts in the Meek skin graft group was significantly higher than that in the microskin graft group. The time of wound healing, the time of skin graft fusion, the time of operation and the cost of treatment of 1% burn area were significantly decreased. The results showed that Meek skin grafting could significantly increase the survival rate of skin grafts and promote wound healing. Shortening the time of operation and reducing the cost of treatment is more valuable in clinical application.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R644

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李云飞;龙晓东;李永忠;;Meek植皮术修复大面积重度烧伤创面的疗效观察[J];贵州医科大学学报;2016年09期

2 张桂全;张珊珊;刘志会;;大面积深度烧伤应用微粒皮移植技术与Meek植皮技术治疗的比较[J];中国医药指南;2016年17期

3 于攀;汪军;洪志坚;姜会庆;;可吸收性生物敷料在特大面积深度烧伤患者膝部创面修复中的应用[J];第三军医大学学报;2015年19期

4 叶胜捷;张文振;庞淑光;陈如俊;叶鹂柳;方声教;章锦成;方庆伟;谢瑞章;;应用Meek微型皮片移植术修复老年成批大面积烧伤创面的疗效观察[J];中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版);2015年03期

5 张明珠;王建华;历虎;董运凤;齐长春;郭宝文;王永岭;刘晓岩;李云峰;张晓慧;刘颖;李兴华;王鸿风;郁强;;异种皮覆盖薄中厚与刃厚微粒皮皮浆移植修复烧伤创面的对比[J];中国组织工程研究;2014年46期

6 陈骥扬;孙东原;孟晖;赖雪娜;;Meek植皮术及微粒皮移植术在特大面积深度烧伤创面治疗中的效果比较[J];当代医学;2014年09期

7 朱恩全;李祥;王晓雁;闻红贵;岳旭文;;不同植皮技术治疗大面积深度烧伤创面的效果比较[J];当代医学;2014年02期

8 明志国;雷晋;段鹏;成剑;魏太平;陈忠江;郭万里;王建明;;Meek植皮技术与微粒皮移植技术在大面积深度烧伤创面治疗中的对照研究[J];中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版);2013年03期

9 刘洋;包校伟;袁华;吴忠好;廖红;孔伟立;夏雄;;Meek植皮术治疗特大面积深度烧伤的临床价值[J];实用临床医药杂志;2013年01期

10 牛利斌;王甲汉;黄磊;刘霞;谢艳平;邱学文;;影响大面积烧伤患者预后的相关因素分析[J];广东医学;2012年13期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 林才;杨宁;张鹏;陈更新;徐建军;罗旭;刘政军;;Meek植皮法与微粒皮植皮法治疗大面积烧伤的经济学比较初探[A];浙江省第十七届烧伤外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年



本文编号:1667092

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1667092.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户deb44***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com