当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

骨水泥型与生物型假体髋关节置换术治疗老年不稳定型股骨颈骨折的疗效

发布时间:2018-04-08 13:06

  本文选题:股骨颈骨折 切入点:骨水泥型假体 出处:《中国老年学杂志》2017年08期


【摘要】:目的探讨骨水泥型与生物型假体髋关节置换术治疗不稳定型老年股骨颈骨折的疗效。方法假体髋关节置换术治疗的不稳定型老年股骨颈骨折患者78例,按照随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组各39例;研究组采用骨水泥型假体髋关节置换术治疗,对照组采用生物型假体髋关节置换术治疗,观察两组临床疗效,术后随访6个月患者髋关节脱位和Harris评分。结果术后1、6个月研究组优良率显著高于对照组(P0.05);研究组手术时间和术中出血量均高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P0.05),住院时间短于对照组(P0.05);两组术后1、6个月髋关节Harris评分均高于术前,且术后6个月高于术后1个月,研究组显著高于对照组(P0.05);两组不良事件发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论骨水泥型假体髋关节置换术治疗不稳定型老年股骨颈骨折患者后早期髋关节功能恢复、近期疗效显著优于生物型假体髋关节置换术。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the effect of hip arthroplasty with bone cement and biological prosthesis for unstable femoral neck fracture.Methods Seventy-eight patients with unstable femoral neck fracture treated by hip prosthesis replacement were divided into study group (n = 39) and control group (n = 39).The patients in the control group were treated with bioprosthetic hip arthroplasty. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was observed. The patients were followed up for 6 months with dislocation of the hip and Harris score.Results the excellent and good rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group at 1 and 6 months after operation, and the operative time and the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the study group were higher than those in the control group.However, the difference was not statistically significant (P 0.05), the hospitalization time was shorter than that in the control group (P 0.05), the Harris score of hip joint in the two groups was higher at 1 and 6 months after operation than that before operation, and at 6 months after operation was higher than that at 1 month after operation.The incidence of adverse events in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.Conclusion the early recovery of hip joint function in the elderly patients with unstable femoral neck fracture treated by bone cement prosthesis hip arthroplasty is significantly better than that of biological prosthesis hip arthroplasty.
【作者单位】: 贵州医科大学附属医院创伤骨科;贵州医科大学附属医院急诊医学科;
【分类号】:R687.4

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 潘承波;王维军;陈树涛;刘征;刘发银;李嗣生;;骨水泥假体与生物型假体在髋关节初次置换中的临床应用研究[J];中国现代医生;2013年25期

2 路玉峰;尚希福;胡飞;赵其纯;朱亚林;史国光;贺瑞;吴鸣;;生物型假体全髋置换术后早期负重近期效果[J];临床骨科杂志;2008年06期

3 李涛;李志丹;肖启贤;肖俊枫;;生物型假体在老年全髋关节翻修术中的应用[J];西部医学;2014年08期

4 李强;唐际存;王锐英;贝朝涌;肖颖;辛林伟;;中年患者生物型假体全髋置换178例:7年随访资料回顾分析(英文)[J];中国组织工程研究与临床康复;2010年43期

5 冯少平;曹梦华;刘新洲;陈震伟;;骨水泥型假体与生物型假体半髋关节置换术治疗移位股骨颈骨折比较[J];中国实用医药;2012年33期

6 刘丙立;李子荣;岳德波;陈德生;张志刚;王雪;;生物型假体关节置换术治疗髋关节发育不良继发骨性关节炎[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2010年04期

7 陈及非;阎作勤;陈云苏;梁昌详;冯振洲;张弛;姚振均;张光健;;远端固定生物型假体在股骨翻修术中的应用[J];中华关节外科杂志(电子版);2009年05期

8 穆文博;曹力;;老年转子间骨折人工关节置换术中骨水泥型与生物型假体应用的现状[J];新疆医科大学学报;2013年10期

9 范永前,刘志宏,王毅,冯建民,杨庆铭;发育性髋关节结构不良患者的全髋关节置换术[J];上海医学;2005年02期

10 ;[J];;年期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 张锐;赵汉平;李佩佳;罗永忠;;生物型髋关节置换治疗高龄老年人股骨颈骨折中期随访报告[A];第20届中国康协肢残康复学术年会论文选集[C];2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 孙轶夫;生物型假体治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效分析[D];吉林大学;2016年

2 郭得辛;远端稳定的生物型人工股骨头置换治疗老年转子间骨折的疗效观察[D];吉林大学;2016年

3 张继孔;全髋骨水泥型和生物型假体治疗晚期股骨头缺血性坏死的系统评价[D];大连医科大学;2013年



本文编号:1721742

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1721742.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5e841***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com