内镜下大球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的临床分析
本文选题:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术1 + 胆总管结石2 ; 参考:《山西医科大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:评估内镜下大球囊扩张术(EPLBD)治疗胆总管结石(CBDs)的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析山西医科大学第一医院消化科于2013年6月至2016年5月行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相关技术治疗CBDs的患者,按纳入排除标准,最终内镜下括约肌切开术(EST)联合EPLBD组入选48例,EPLBD组35例。分别对两组患者的临床资料,结石清除率,机械碎石使用率及并发症进行比较。结果:一次性完整结石清除率EST联合EPLBD组和EPLBD组分别是46例(95.8%)、33例(94.3%),机械碎石术使用率分别是7例(14.7%)、7例(17.1%),差异均无统计学意义。两组使用扩张球囊的中位数均是15mm,P=0.548。操作时间(从插管成功到结石清除)分别为35.92±7.67min、32.66±6.02min,EPLBD组时间较短,差异有统计学意义(P=0.040)。两组胰腺炎、高淀粉酶血症发生率相似,差异无统计学意义。结论:1.单纯EPLBD和EST联合EPLBD是一样有效的、安全的治疗CBDs的方式。2.EPLBD前EST可能是不必要的,单纯EPLBD可以简化治疗胆总管结石的程序,降低设备成本。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EPLBDD) in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.Methods: the patients with CBDs treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) from June 2013 to May 2016 in Department of Digestive, first Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were retrospectively analyzed.The final endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with EPLBD group included 48 cases of EPLBD group (35 cases).The clinical data, stone clearance rate, utilization rate of mechanical lithotripsy and complications were compared between the two groups.Results: the one-time complete stone clearance rate in EST combined with EPLBD group and EPLBD group were 46 cases (95. 8%) and 33 cases (94. 3%), respectively. The utilization rate of mechanical lithotripsy was 7 cases (14. 7%) and 7 cases (17. 1%) respectively. The difference was not statistically significant.The median value of dilated balloon use in both groups was 15 mm.The operation time (from successful intubation to stone removal) was 35.92 卤7.67min (32.66 卤6.02min), respectively, and the time of EPLBD was shorter than that of EPLBD (P < 0.040).The incidence of hyperamylase was similar in the two groups with no statistical significance.Conclusion 1.Simple EPLBD and EST combined with EPLBD are equally effective. 2. EPLBD pre- may be unnecessary. Simple EPLBD can simplify the procedure of treating choledocholithiasis and reduce the cost of equipment.
【学位授予单位】:山西医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R657.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 Toshio Fujisawa;Koichi Kagawa;Kantaro Hisatomi;Kensuke Kubota;Atsushi Nakajima;Nobuyuki Matsuhashi;;Is endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation really a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis?[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2016年26期
2 Jun Ding;Fu Li;Hong-Yi Zhu;Xi-Wen Zhang;;Endoscopic treatment of difficult extrahepatic bile duct stones, EPBD or EST: An anatomic view[J];World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy;2015年03期
3 Kwok-Hung Lai;Hoi-Hung Chan;Tzung-Jiun Tsai;Jin-Shiung Cheng;Ping-I Hsu;;Reappraisal of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones[J];World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy;2015年02期
4 崔春霞;宫爱霞;葛林梅;梁莉莉;孙颖;孙康;马菁;刘艳杰;;内镜下乳头括约肌切开联合大球囊扩张治疗胆总管结石的疗效观察[J];中华消化内镜杂志;2014年09期
5 Olivier Rouquette;Gilles Bommelaer;Armo Abergel;Laurent Poincloux;;Large balloon dilation post endoscopic sphincterotomy in removal of difficult common bile duct stones:A literature review[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2014年24期
6 Xiao-Ming Yang;Bing Hu;;Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis:A meta-analysis[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2013年48期
7 Jin Hong Kim;Min Jae Yang;Jae Chul Hwang;Byung Moo Yoo;;Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2013年46期
8 李炜;曹亦军;张计训;倪雷;陈超;;内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合大球囊扩张术治疗难治性胆总管结石106例临床分析[J];肝胆胰外科杂志;2013年05期
9 Hong-Chuan Zhao;Liang He;Da-Chen Zhou;Xiao-Ping Geng;Fa-Ming Pan;;Meta-analysis comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2013年24期
10 刘治军;郭瑾陶;王晟;葛楠;刘香;王国鑫;孙思予;;内镜下乳头括约肌切开加大球囊扩张与常规乳头括约肌切开治疗胆总管结石的比较研究[J];中国内镜杂志;2011年09期
,本文编号:1757172
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1757172.html