经皮内镜腰神经根减压术后疼痛改善的研究
本文选题:下腰痛 + 神经根性病变 ; 参考:《中国人民解放军医学院》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:观察并评估经皮内镜腰神经根减压术治疗腰腿疼痛术后的疼痛改善情况。方法:对解放军总医院骨科2015年1月-2016年1月连续84例经皮脊柱内镜腰神经减压术治疗腰背痛和(或)神经根性下肢痛的患者,前瞻随访两种疼痛各自在术前、术后1-12周(1周1次)的VAS评分及末次随访时的改良MacNab疗效评定,评估两种疼痛各自在术后12周里的改善情况,比较两者的疼痛改善度(术前VAS-末次随访VAS)和末次随访时的改良MacNab疗效评定,用末次随访时ODI、腰背痛VAS、下肢痛VAS评分与术前比较评价全体患者的手术疗效。结果:腰背痛术后1-12周VAS评分相邻两周间差异无统计学意义(P均0.05);下肢痛术后 VAS 评分第 2 周 vs 第 1 周[(2.96±1.97)分 vs(2.10±1.29)分、P0.05]、差异显著,第 4 周 vs 第 3 周[(2.04±1.62)分 vs (2.46±1.97)分、P0.05]、差异显著,余下相邻两周间差异无统计学意义(P0.05);下肢痛术后12周VAS改善度及改良MacNab优良率均显著优于腰背痛[(6.64±1.47)分vs (3.36±1.38)分、86%vs73%,P0.05];全体患者末次随访ODI、腰背痛VAS、下肢痛VAS均较术前显著降低[(12.82±6.39)分 vs (53.64±11.73)分、(1.16±1.06)分 vs (4.52±0.65)分、(1.29±1.30)分 vs (7.93±0.81)分,P 均0.05]。结论:经皮内镜腰神经根减压术后12周患者腰背痛的改善平稳,而下肢痛的改善在术后第2周、3周出现波动,术前应指导患者建立对手术效果和术后恢复的合理预期,术后应观察至少3周、其后是否有下降趋势,可在术后第2、3周通过物理治疗、药物治疗等进行对症处理。经皮内镜腰神经根减压术适合治疗以单侧下肢根性疼痛为突出表现的腰椎退变疾病,轴性腰痛并非其最佳适应症。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe and evaluate the improvement of pain after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar nerve root decompression for lumbar and leg pain. Methods: from January 2015 to January 2016, 84 consecutive patients with low back pain and / or nerve root pain were treated by percutaneous endoscopic lumbar nerve decompression. VAS score at 1-12 weeks after operation and modified MacNab evaluation at the last follow-up were used to evaluate the improvement of the two kinds of pain in 12 weeks postoperatively. The degree of pain improvement (preoperative VAS-last follow-up vs) and modified MacNab evaluation at the last follow-up were compared between the two groups. The surgical efficacy of all patients was evaluated with VAS score of LBP, LBP and VAS-LBP at the last follow-up. Results: there was no significant difference in the VAS score between the two weeks after the operation of low back pain (P < 0.05), and the VAS score in the second week after operation was significantly higher than that in the first week (P < 0.05) [2.96 卤1.97) vs(2.10 卤1.29 (P0.05)]. The fourth week vs the third week [2.04 卤1.62) vs 2.46 卤1.97], the difference was significant. There was no significant difference between the remaining two weeks (P 0.05), the improvement degree of VAS and the excellent and good rate of modified MacNab 12 weeks after operation were significantly better than those of low back pain [6.64 卤1.47) vs 3.36 卤1.38]. The score was decreased [12.82 卤6.39) vs 53.64 卤11.73) (1.16 卤1.06) vs 4.52 卤0.65) (1.29 卤1.30) vs 7.93 卤0.81 (P 0.05). Conclusion: the improvement of low back pain is stable at 12 weeks after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar nerve root decompression, while the improvement of lower extremity pain fluctuates at the second week after operation. It should be observed at least 3 weeks after the operation, then whether there is a downward trend or not, can be treated by physical therapy, drug therapy and so on in the 2nd week after operation. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar nerve root decompression is suitable for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases characterized by unilateral lower limb root pain. Axial low back pain is not the best indication.
【学位授予单位】:中国人民解放军医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R687.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 关家文;张洪涛;孙海涛;刘维财;马宗雷;韩大鹏;魏帅帅;;椎管内骨化腰椎间盘突出症的影像分析与内镜治疗[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2016年21期
2 黄良诚;郭燕梅;李宁;陈锦旭;曾祥超;车路阳;郭清华;薛大鹏;张西峰;黄鹏;;经皮内镜腰神经根减压术后疼痛症状改善进展的研究[J];中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版);2016年05期
3 张咏;肖琴;;海勤人员腰腿痛调查与相关因素分析[J];实用医药杂志;2016年08期
4 曾祥超;黄鹏;张西峰;陈锦旭;李宁;黄良诚;车路阳;王岩;;经皮内镜治疗老年腰椎间盘突出与椎管狭窄的比较[J];中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版);2016年01期
5 张琳;张西峰;侯克东;杨华东;蒋续钢;李凝道;;改良YESS技术在治疗腰椎间盘突出症中应用的中期临床疗效观察[J];中华解剖与临床杂志;2015年06期
6 党靖东;高利强;刘务杰;李福林;叶林江;;脊柱内窥镜下技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J];中国医学创新;2014年05期
7 刘健;孟丽丽;张荣伟;;机务人员颈肩腰腿痛调查分析与治疗[J];中华保健医学杂志;2013年04期
8 李长青;周跃;王建;初同伟;张正丰;郑文杰;罗刚;;经皮椎间孔内窥镜下靶向穿刺椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2013年03期
9 王洪伟;李长青;周跃;;腰椎间盘突出症疼痛发生机制的研究进展[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2011年07期
10 闫家智;林欣;潘海涛;王磊;崔维;张西峰;;经皮椎间孔内窥镜下手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的近期疗效观察[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2011年03期
,本文编号:1821568
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1821568.html