脊髓损伤营养筛查量表和营养不良通用筛查量表在脊髓损伤患者早期康复中的应用比较

发布时间：2018-05-15 13:34

本文选题：营养不良 + 脊髓损伤　；参考：《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》2017年09期

【摘要】：目的 :评价脊髓损伤营养筛查量表(spinal nutrition screening tool,SNST)和营养不良通用筛查量表(malnutrition universal screening tool,MUST)对脊髓损伤(spinal cord injury,SCI)早期康复治疗患者营养筛查情况,并探讨两种工具临床适用性。方法:采用连续定点抽样方法,选取2016年1月~2016年12月期间入住康复科的脊髓损伤患者共101例,其中男性80例,女性21例,年龄54.1±14.4岁,颈髓节段损伤81例,非颈髓节段损伤20例,使用SNST和MUST两种方法进行营养不良风险评估,比较两种方法评价结果。结果:入组患者营养不良评估中度风险检出率SNST为50例(49.5%)、MUST为45例(44.5%),营养不良评估高度风险检查率SNST为18例(17.8%)、MUST为17例(16.8%),SNST与MUST判定结果的差异不具统计学意义(χ2=1.100,P=0.677)。结论 :SCI早期康复治疗患者应用SNST和MUST营养不良风险的检出率较高(60%)且无统计学差异,两种工具对SCI早期康复治疗患者均具有适用性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the nutritional screening of spinal cord injury (sci) and malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) in patients with spinal cord injury (sci) and spinal cord injury (sci), and to explore the clinical applicability of the two tools. Methods: a total of 101 patients with spinal cord injury were selected from January 2016 to December 2016, including 80 males and 21 females, aged 54.1 卤14.4 years, and 81 patients with cervical spinal cord injury. SNST and MUST were used to evaluate the risk of malnutrition in 20 patients with non-cervical spinal cord injury. Results: the detection rate of moderate risk of malnutrition in 50 patients with SNST was 49.5%, that of 45 patients with high risk of malnutrition was 44.5%, and that of 18 patients with high risk of malnutrition assessment was 17.8MUST (17 cases). There was no significant difference between SNST and MUST (蠂 21.100). Conclusion the detection rate of malnutrition risk of SNST and MUST in patients with early rehabilitation therapy of SNST and MUST is higher than that of control group. There is no statistical difference between them. The two tools are suitable for early rehabilitation of SCI patients.
【作者单位】：遵义医学院附属医院康复科;遵义医学院附属医院脑血管病科;遵义医学院附属医院急诊科;遵义医学院附属医院脊柱外科;
【分类号】：R651.2

【相似文献】