下腰椎椎弓根高度与宽度差及椎弓根轴线的3D-CT观察
本文选题:腰椎椎弓根 + CT重建 ; 参考:《西南医科大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的:观察下腰椎(L_(3-5))椎弓根最狭窄处椎弓根高度(Pedicle Outer Height,POH)与椎弓根宽度(Pedicle Outer Width,POW)差值(Pedicel Difference,PD)、椎弓根冠状面长轴与正中矢状面夹角(Coronal inclination,CI)的变化规律,探讨下腰椎椎弓根螺钉置钉与椎弓根形态的匹配性。方法:选取西南医科大学附属医院脊柱外科2015年7月1日~2015年9月30日在我院放射科行全腹增强CT及腰部CT+三维重建的人群作为测量对象,最终选取115例共690个椎弓根,男80例,女35例,男性组,年龄18~78岁平均48.4±14.2岁;身高145~178cm平均167.2±6.1cm;体重44~86kg平均63.7±10.0kg。女性组,年龄18~82岁平均48.20±14.4岁;身高141~163cm平均154.4±4.5cm;体重38~71kg平均54.3±8.9kg。均采用64排螺旋CT从L_3-S1连续扫描,扫描的原始图像传至图像后处理ADW4.4工作站中,运用多平面重建(multiplanar reconstruction,MPR)技术获得椎弓根峡部的横断面和冠状面形态,在其最佳层面观察测量L_3到L_5椎弓根最窄处POW、POH,计算PD,测量CI值。将性别分为男、女两组;年龄分为≤60岁、60岁两组;身高分为≤160cm、160cm两组;体重指数(Body Mass Index,BMI)分24、≥24两组。观察每组各脊椎椎弓根高度与宽度及其差值、椎弓根最窄处冠状面轴线与矢状中线的夹角(ci)的变化规律;每个脊椎椎弓根对应的高度与宽度差值(pd)0mm百分比;椎弓根宽度或高度7mm的百分比。运用microsoftofficeexcel2003和spss17.0软件进行数据统计分析,各脊椎椎弓根高度与宽度差值间、椎弓根冠状面轴线夹角间的对比分析采用两两比较q检验和单因素方差分析(one-wayanalysisofvariance,anova)。结果:本研究收集115例共690个椎弓根,其中男性80例480个椎弓根、女性35例210个椎弓根。统计结果显示各对应脊椎从l3到l5左右两侧poh、pow、pd及ci均无显著性差异(p0.05)。(1)患者下腰椎(l3-5)各对应脊椎poh分别为:l3(12.5±1.4mm)、l4(11.1±1.5mm)、l5(10.4±1.5mm),l3l4l5。pow分别为:l3(8.3±1.6mm)、l4(10.1±1.7mm)、l5(14.1±2.2mm),l3l4l5。pd分别为:l3(4.1±1.9mm)、l4(0.9±1.9mm)、l5(-3.8±2.2mm),最大值在l3:9.1mm;最小值在l5:-12.2mm,l3l4l5。ci分别为:l3(18.1±9.8°)、l4(36.5±9.6°)、l5(43.3±6.5°),最大值在l5:66.2°;最小值在l3及l4:0°,l3l4l5。(2)椎弓根高度与宽度差值(pd)0mm的百分比从l3到l5依次为:2.6、28.3、96.1。(3)从l3到l5脊椎所有poh均大于7mm,pow7mm的百分比从l3到l5依次为:男性:10.3、1.7、0。女性:14.2、2.7、0。在性别、年龄、身高、体重指数分组中,男性各脊椎pd值均小于女性,男性ci平均值均大于女性,但无显著性差异(p≥0.05);pd及ci与性别、年龄、身高、体重相关性无统计学意义(p≥0.05),椎节间差异明显,从l3到l5各对应脊椎pd、ci经两两比较,有统计学差异(p0.05)。结论:1、下腰椎椎弓根PD从L_3到L_5分别为:L_3(4.1±1.9mm)、L_4(0.9±1.9mm)、L_5(-3.8±2.2mm);L_3L_4L_5,且女性PD均大于男性,整体表明在下腰椎女性的POH与POW的变异较男性大。PD与年龄、身高、体重均无明显相关性,椎节是影响PD的重要因素。2、在下腰椎CI分别为:L_3(18.1±9.8°)、L_4(36.5±9.6°)、L_5(43.3±6.5°),L_3L_4L_5,CI与性别、年龄、身高、体重均无明显相关性,椎节是影响CI的重要因素。3、椎弓根高度与宽度差值(PD)0mm的百分比从L_3到L_5逐渐增大分别为:2.6、28.3、96.1,当该差值0mm时,选择螺钉直径应以椎弓根高度为准。4.本研究发现从L_3到L_5脊椎所有POH均大于7mm,POW7mm的百分比从L_3到L_5依次为:12.3、2.2、0。POW小于7mm的比例,女性明显多于男性。
[Abstract]:Objective: To observe the variation of the difference between the pedicle height (Pedicle Outer Height, POH) and the width of the pedicle (Pedicle Outer Width, POW) (Pedicel Difference, PD) and the angle between the long axis of the pedicle and the median sagittal plane of the pedicle of the lower lumbar pedicle (L_ (3-5)), and to explore the pedicle screw and the vertebral arch of the lower lumbar vertebrae. Methods: in the Department of spinal surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University in July 1, 2015 ~2015 September 30th ~2015 years in the Department of Radiology, the total abdominal enhancement of CT and the 3D reconstruction of CT+ in the waist were taken as the measurement object. Finally, 115 cases of 690 pedicles were selected, including 80 males, 35 females, male groups, and the average age of 48.4 + 14.2 years old. The average height of 145~178cm was 167.2 + 6.1cm, the average weight of 44~86kg was 63.7 + 10.0kg., the average age was 48.20 + 14.4 years old, the average height 141~163cm was 154.4 + 4.5cm, the average weight 38~71kg was 54.3 + 8.9kg., and 64 rows of spiral CT were scanned from L_3-S1 continuous. The original image of the scan was transmitted to the image post processing ADW4.4 workstation, and the multiplane reconstruction was used. (multiplanar reconstruction, MPR) technique obtained the transverse and coronal shape of the pedicle isthmus. At its best level, we measured the narrowest location of L_3 to L_5 pedicle POW, POH, and calculated PD, and measured the CI values. The sex was divided into male and female two groups; age was divided into less than 60 years, 60 years old and two groups; height was divided into 160cm, 160cm two groups; mass index (Body) BMI) was divided into groups of 24, 24 and two groups. The height and width of Shiumi Ne's spine in each group and the difference between the coronal axis and the sagittal line (CI) were observed, and the difference between the height and width of the spine (PD) 0mm in each spine, and the percentage of the width of Shiumi Ne (PD), and the percentage of 7mm in the width of Shiumi Ne were used. SPSS17.0 software was used for data statistical analysis, the difference between the vertebral pedicle height and width, and the comparative analysis of the angle between the pedicle coronal axis and the angle of the coronal axis of the vertebral arch by 22 comparison Q test and single factor analysis of variance (one-wayanalysisofvariance, ANOVA). Results: This study collected 690 pedicles, including 80 males and 480 pedicle roots. There were 210 vertebral pedicles in 35 cases. The statistical results showed that there were no significant differences in the corresponding vertebrae from L3 to about L5, pow, PD and CI (P0.05). (1) the lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-5) of the lower lumbar (L3-5) corresponding vertebra poh were L3 (12.5 + 1.4mm), L4 (8.3 + 10.4), 8.3 (10.1 +), 14.1 + L3 (4.1 + 1.9mm), L4 (0.9 + 1.9mm), L5 (-3.8 + 2.2mm), the maximum value in l3:9.1mm; the minimum value is l5:-12.2mm, and l3l4l5.ci is L3 (18.1 + 9.8 degrees), L4 (36.5 + 9.6), 43.3 + 6.5 degrees, and the minimum value of the difference between the height and width of the pedicle (2) All poh of 6.1. (3) from L3 to L5 were greater than 7mm, and the percentage of pow7mm from L3 to L5 was as follows: male: 10.3,1.7,0. female: 14.2,2.7,0. in sex, age, height, body mass index group, the PD value of all vertebrae in male is smaller than that of women, and the average value of male CI is greater than that of women, but there is no significant difference (0.05). There was no significant difference in weight correlation (P > 0.05), there was a significant difference in intervertebral space between L3 and L5, and there was a statistical difference between L3 and L5 (P0.05). Conclusion: 1, the PD from L_3 to L_5 in the lower lumbar vertebrae is L_3 (4.1 + 1.9mm), L_4 (0.9 +), and females are all larger than men, and the whole show in the lower lumbar spine The variation of POH and POW in women has no significant correlation with age, height and weight, and vertebra node is an important factor affecting PD,.2 in the lower lumbar CI: L_3 (18.1 + 9.8 degrees), L_4 (36.5 + 9.6 degrees), L_5 (43.3 + 6.5 degrees), L_3L_4L_5, CI and sex, age, height and weight, and vertebra node is an important factor affecting CI. The percentage of the height and width difference (PD) 0mm of the arch root gradually increased from L_3 to L_5, respectively: 2.6,28.3,96.1. When the difference was 0mm, the diameter of the screw should be determined by the height of the pedicle of the vertebral arch as a quasi.4.. All POH from L_3 to L_5 were larger than 7mm. More than men.
【学位授予单位】:西南医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R687.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谢军,邓宁;三种椎弓根钉置钉方法对比分析[J];医学文选;2003年04期
2 石锐,刘浩,袁元,吴伟;不同节段椎弓根内部结构的测量和比较[J];中国临床解剖学杂志;2005年05期
3 孙建民;崔新刚;蒋振松;袁泽农;刘峰;;脊柱侧凸患者椎弓根形态变化与椎弓根外固定术的应用[J];中国临床解剖学杂志;2006年05期
4 乔国勇;关凤英;耿瑞鹏;杨海平;陈欣志;;基于椎弓根三维形态测量实施个体化置钉技术[J];中国组织工程研究与临床康复;2007年26期
5 马岩;李岩;马威;徐飞;;中国北方地区成人椎弓根形态的测量及其临床意义[J];中国临床解剖学杂志;2009年03期
6 唐光辉;;胸腰椎爆裂性骨折经骨折椎椎弓根直接复位固定可行性研究[J];中国医药导报;2012年04期
7 尹晓明 ,马雄君 ,M.Aebi;椎弓根钉固定术的适应证、技术及并发证[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;1991年02期
8 俞光荣;叶林根;;经椎弓根固定术在脊柱外科中的应用[J];骨与关节损伤杂志;1991年04期
9 徐又佳,郑祖根,董启榕,,成茂华,张小东;椎弓根投影的放射学实验研究[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;1996年S1期
10 李荣来,江进海,王海元;顺椎弓根中央进钉脊柱固定在基层医院的应用[J];江西医药;2001年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 李超;干阜生;王以进;赵致良;符东林;于海洋;周宇;;拱桥弹性椎弓根固定器研制与临床应用[A];2003年全国骨关节损伤专题研讨会论文汇编[C];2003年
2 侯明;朱智奇;谢小青;许思亮;侯伟东;李瑾;;经骨折椎椎弓根固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折[A];第十九届中国康协肢残康复学术年会论文选集[C];2010年
3 崔新刚;孙建民;蒋振松;;胸椎椎弓根根外内固定临床应用评价[A];第二届华东地区骨科学术大会暨山东省第九次骨科学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
4 宋舟锋;潘兵;卢一生;许文根;符楚迪;张志敬;葛云林;;胸腰椎骨折经伤椎单侧椎弓根固定的临床研究[A];浙江省医学会骨科学分会30年庆典暨2011年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
5 潘兵;宋舟锋;张志敬;卢一生;许文根;符楚迪;葛云林;;胸腰椎骨折经伤椎单侧椎弓根固定的初步临床研究[A];2012年浙江省骨科学术年会论文集[C];2012年
6 陆声;徐永清;张元智;师继红;李军;丁晶;陈国平;陈玉兵;冯子良;;计算机辅助个体化导航模板在Hangman骨折中的临床应用[A];第六届西部骨科论坛暨贵州省骨科年会论文汇编[C];2010年
7 解京明;王迎松;赵智;张颖;杨振东;李韬;;严重脊柱畸形伴椎弓根结构异常的五步补救置钉法[A];第六届西部骨科论坛暨贵州省骨科年会论文汇编[C];2010年
8 袁欣华;庞清江;许柯;张宗凯;祝惠敏;叶奕;赵卫东;;钉棒系统分别行颈椎侧块及椎弓根固定后初始稳定性评价[A];2012年浙江省骨科学术年会论文集[C];2012年
9 袁欣华;庞清江;许柯;张宗凯;祝惠敏;叶奕;赵卫东;;钉棒系统分别行颈椎侧块及椎弓根固定后初始稳定性评价[A];2013中国工程院科技论坛暨浙江省骨科学学术年会论文摘要集[C];2013年
10 许天明;陈建明;张成程;李勇;李占清;刘山林;;经伤椎单侧椎弓根固定治疗胸腰段骨折的临床研究[A];第六届西部骨科论坛暨贵州省骨科年会论文汇编[C];2010年
相关博士学位论文 前8条
1 庄新明;骶1双皮质椎弓根钉单点矫正和三维固定在腰骶固定的生物力学研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
2 李严兵;脊柱椎弓根进钉通道数字解剖学研究[D];南方医科大学;2007年
3 付少锋;胸椎椎弓根和椎弓根—助骨复合体的应用解剖及相关内固定技术的生物力学研究与临床评价[D];重庆医科大学;2014年
4 崔新刚;胸椎椎弓根根外内固定的应用解剖与生物力学研究及临床应用评价[D];山东大学;2006年
5 陈育春;下颈椎及胸椎椎弓根置钉的解剖形态学CT重建研究[D];汕头大学;2009年
6 贺聚良;上胸椎前路逆向椎弓根及逆向椎弓根—肋骨复合体镙钉技术的可行性研究[D];广西医科大学;2013年
7 朱若夫;颈椎椎弓根内固定术的基础和临床研究[D];苏州大学;2008年
8 付裕;青少年特发性脊柱侧凸经椎弓根—肋骨复合体固定临床解剖数字化测量、个性化手术设计及有限元分析[D];重庆医科大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 彭丰;椎弓根钉棒固定对早发性脊柱侧凸椎体发育影响的影像学研究[D];昆明医科大学;2016年
2 安丰敏;椎弓根外侧入路行椎体成形术的应用解剖学研究及临床意义[D];青岛大学;2015年
3 曹波;下腰椎椎弓根高度与宽度差及椎弓根轴线的3D-CT观察[D];西南医科大学;2016年
4 石锐;椎弓根内部结构的解剖学、影像学研究[D];四川大学;2004年
5 刘大禹;骶2“椎弓根”螺钉的生物力学研究(一)[D];吉林大学;2009年
6 李学锋;胸1椎弓根置钉的临床应用解剖学研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
7 叶保国;椎弓根皮质破裂对椎弓根固定影响的生物力学研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
8 李野;骶2“椎弓根”置钉的应用解剖学研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
9 王铮;脊柱靶心机器人椎弓根标准轴位引导胸椎弓根置针实验研究[D];郑州大学;2010年
10 王宗江;带预警装置的椎弓根螺锥的研制与实验研究[D];福建中医学院;2009年
本文编号:1962357
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1962357.html