当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

脊髓损伤大鼠触液神经元中p75NTR的表达

发布时间:2018-06-28 22:41

  本文选题:脊髓损伤 + 触液神经元 ; 参考:《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》2017年04期


【摘要】:目的 :探讨大鼠触液神经元(cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons,CSF-CNs)p75神经营养因子受体(p75 neurotrophin receptor,p75NTR)在脊髓损伤后的表达变化。方法 :成年雌性Sprague-Dawley(SD)大鼠36只,按随机数字表法分为正常对照组(6只)、假手术组(6只)和脊髓损伤组(24只),脊髓损伤组采用Allen′s打击模型(10g×3cm)在大鼠脊髓T10段造成急性脊髓损伤,分别于损伤3d、1周、2周、4周后进行取材;对照组不做任何处理,假手术组只暴露脊髓,不击伤脊髓。对各组大鼠运动功能行BBB评分,各时间点取材行病理切片HE染色观察。取材前48h侧脑室注射霍乱毒素B亚单位与辣根过氧化物酶复合物(CB-HRP)特异性标记触液神经元。处死大鼠后,取损伤的脊髓节段10mm,用免疫荧光双标法检测触液神经元p75NTR的表达,ImagePro Plus计数目标神经元CB-HRP/p75双阳性细胞的数目。结果 :假手术组各时间点BBB评分均为21.0±0;脊髓损伤组在术后3d、1周、2周、4周各时间点BBB评分分别为3.20±0.81、10.73±1.02、12.48±1.86、13.29±1.93,两组各时间点差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。HE染色可见正常对照组和假手术组脊髓组织结构完整,细胞形态正常;脊髓损伤组脊髓组织结构紊乱,神经元变性坏死,胶质细胞增生,胶质瘢痕和脊髓空洞形成。免疫荧光双标示正常对照组和假手术组可见少量CB-HRP/p75双阳性细胞,计数分别为5.16±0.55、4.31±0.61,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);脊髓损伤组伤后3d、1周、2周CB-HRP/p75双阳性细胞数分别为13.35±1.53、21.68±2.15、16.26±2.09,与正常对照组和假手术组比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),伤后4周时,CB-HRP/p75双阳性细胞数为4.83±0.73,与正常对照组和假手术组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 :p75NTR可在大鼠脊髓触液神经元中表达,且在脊髓损伤后表达增加,触液神经元可能通过p75NTR参与脊髓损伤的修复过程。
[Abstract]:Aim: to investigate the expression of p75 neurotrophin receptor p75 NTR in cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons (CSF-CNs) after spinal cord injury. Methods: there were 36 adult female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. The rats were randomly divided into normal control group (n = 6), sham operation group (n = 6) and spinal cord injury group (n = 24). Acute spinal cord injury (sci) was induced by Allen's model (10 g 脳 3cm). The samples were taken after 3 days and 2 weeks and 4 weeks after injury, while the control group did not do any treatment, and the sham operation group only exposed the spinal cord and did not hurt the spinal cord. The motor function of rats in each group was assessed by BBB, and pathological sections were stained by HE staining at each time point. Cholera toxin B subunit and horseradish peroxidase complex (CB-HRP) were injected into the lateral ventricle 48 hours before the injection. After the rats were killed, the injured spinal cord segment was taken at 10 mm. The expression of p75NTR in the neurons of contact fluid was detected by immunofluorescence double labeling method. The number of CB-HRP / p75 double positive cells in the target neurons was counted by ImagePro Plus. Results: the BBB score of sham operation group was 21.0 卤0, and that of spinal cord injury group was 3.20 卤0.81n 10.73 卤1.02nil 12.48 卤1.86n 13.29 卤1.93 at each time point, and the BBB score of spinal cord injury group was 3.20 卤0.81n 10.73 卤1.02n 12.48 卤1.86n 13.29 卤1.93, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups at each time point (P0.05) .HE staining showed that the normal control group and HE staining group had statistical significance (P0.05). The spinal cord of sham-operated group was intact, In the spinal cord injury group, the structure of the spinal cord was disordered, the neurons degeneration and necrosis, the proliferation of glial cells, the formation of glial scar and syringomyelia. Immunofluorescence double labeling showed a small number of CB-HRP / p75 double positive cells in normal control group and sham operation group. The number of CB-HRP / p75 double positive cells in spinal cord injury group was 13.35 卤1.53 卤21.68 卤2.15n 16.26 卤2.09, which was significantly higher than that in normal control group and sham operation group (P0.05), and CB-HRP / p75 double positive cells in spinal cord injury group were significantly higher than those in normal control group and sham operation group at 4 weeks after injury (P0.05), and the number of CB-HRP / p75 double positive cells in spinal cord injury group was 13.35 卤1.53n 21.68 卤2.15n 16.26 卤2.09 respectively (P0.05). The number of double positive cells was 4.83 卤0.73, which was not significantly different from that of normal control group and sham operation group (P0.05). Conclusion the expression of p75NTR in rat spinal cord contact neurons is increased after spinal cord injury, and the fluid contact neurons may participate in the repair of spinal cord injury through p75NTR.
【作者单位】: 贵州医科大学;贵州医科大学附属医院急诊骨科;
【基金】:贵州省科技计划(黔科合LH字[2014]7149)
【分类号】:R651.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 赵瑞峰,才书春,张强,张杰,晋记龙,靳建明;低场强MRI扫描对脊髓损伤的评价[J];山西临床医药;2000年12期

2 关骅,唐和虎;脊髓损伤早期康复[J];中国康复理论与实践;2000年04期

3 吴文坚;脊髓损伤的心理效应[J];国外医学(创伤与外科基本问题分册);2000年02期

4 詹海英;脊髓损伤患者的膀胱训练[J];现代康复;2001年06期

5 于笑难,蒋品;脊髓损伤患者偏瘫与血清瘦素的关系[J];现代康复;2001年20期

6 邓宁;脊髓损伤的治疗及研究展望[J];医学文选;2001年06期

7 任少华;脊髓损伤患者的咳嗽阈值[J];中国康复;2001年04期

8 ;修复脊髓损伤的新方法[J];河南医学研究;2002年04期

9 赵斌,孙正义;碱性成纤维细胞生长因子与脊髓损伤[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2002年01期

10 陈君;社区脊髓损伤患者的服务需求[J];国外医学(物理医学与康复学分册);2003年03期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 于铁强;冯世庆;;216例外伤性脊髓损伤住院患者分析[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年

2 叶英;;骨髓间充质干细胞治疗脊髓损伤的研究进展[A];中华医学会急诊医学分会第十三次全国急诊医学学术年会大会论文集[C];2010年

3 张泽华;许以秀;黄小虹;;脊髓损伤早期康复进展[A];中国病理生理学会中专教育委员会会议论文集[C];2003年

4 吕卫军;;脊髓损伤康复的观察[A];中国康复医学会第五届全国康复治疗学术会议论文集[C];2006年

5 吴波;任先军;郭树章;;少突胶质前体细胞移植治疗脊髓损伤[A];第八届全国脊柱脊髓损伤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年

6 蔡培强;汤逊;;脊髓损伤的移植治疗研究现状及进展[A];第八届全国脊柱脊髓损伤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年

7 白跃宏;;脊髓损伤的康复[A];中国康复医学会第五次全国老年康复学术大会上海市康复医学会成立20周年暨老年康复诊疗提高班论文汇编[C];2008年

8 万里;史文博;廖利民;;夜间阴茎勃起测定系统对不同平面脊髓损伤者的观测[A];中华医学会男科学分会第十三次全国男科学术会议论文集[C];2012年

9 周谋望;;脊髓损伤康复进展[A];2013浙江省物理医学与康复学学术年会暨第八届浙江省康复医学发展论坛论文集[C];2013年

10 周艳姝;;脊髓损伤的康复[A];2013浙江省物理医学与康复学学术年会暨第八届浙江省康复医学发展论坛论文集[C];2013年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 编译 于娜;早期脊髓损伤有新疗法[N];医药经济报;2009年

2 上海杨浦 朱群邦;脊髓损伤患者的家居环境改进[N];上海中医药报;2012年

3 上海浦东 陆至顺;脊髓损伤患者的心理特征[N];上海中医药报;2013年

4 郑颖t,

本文编号:2079653


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2079653.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c00cc***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com