胰十二指肠切除术中放置与不放置胰管支撑管的比较
本文选题:胰十二指肠切除术 + 胰管支撑管 ; 参考:《重庆医科大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:研究背景胰十二指肠切除术是腹部外科最复杂、风险最高的手术之一,术后并发症发生率高,其中胰瘘是最常见和最严重的术后并发症。对于在胰肠吻合的过程中,在胰管内置入支撑管将胰液外引流是否能减少胰瘘的发生率,目前国内外存在广泛的争议,相关的随机对照试验研究也较少。目的评价不同胰肠吻合方式在胰十二指肠切除术中的临床疗效,探讨不放置胰管支撑管的胰肠吻合的适用性。方法我院自2012年1月至2015年12月收治的87例可行胰十二指肠切除术患者,按随机分配方式分为胰管-空肠黏膜对黏膜端侧吻合+胰管支撑管外引流组(A组,43例)和胰腺-空肠端侧吻合不放置胰管支撑管组(B组,44例),比较两种不同胰肠吻合方式行胰肠吻合术的时间及术后住院时间、术后并发症的发生率。结果术中未放入胰管支撑管组的胰肠吻合时间(平均15.4min)明显小于术中放入胰管支撑管组(平均21.1min),差异有统计学意义(t=7.137,P0.05)。B组患者术后住院时间小于A组(t=2.408,P0.05,差异有统计学意义)。两组患者术后胰瘘、腹腔出血、腹腔感染、胃潴留,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.181,0.322,0.603,0.001;P0.05)。结论胰十二指肠切除术不放置胰管支撑管可减少手术时间,降低术后住院天数,且术后并发症的发生率无显著差异,是安全可靠的。
[Abstract]:Background pancreaticoduodenectomy is one of the most complex and high-risk operations in abdominal surgery. The incidence of postoperative complications is high. Pancreatic fistula is the most common and severe postoperative complication. In the process of pancreaticojejunostomy, whether the drainage of pancreatic juice can reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula by inserting a supporting tube into the pancreatic duct is widely disputed at home and abroad, and there are few related randomized controlled trials at home and abroad. Objective to evaluate the clinical effect of different pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy and to explore the applicability of pancreaticojejunostomy without pancreatic duct supporting tube. Methods from January 2012 to December 2015, 87 cases of feasible pancreaticoduodenectomy were treated in our hospital. According to the random distribution pattern, the pancreatic duct and jejunum mucosa were divided into two groups: pancreatic duct end-to-side anastomosis group (group A, 43 cases) and pancreatic jejunal end-to-side anastomosis group (group B, 44 cases). Two different types of pancreaticojejunostomy were compared. The time of pancreaticojejunostomy and the time of hospitalization, Incidence of postoperative complications. Results the mean time of pancreaticojejunostomy (15.4min) in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A (mean 21.1min), and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The postoperative hospitalization time in group B was less than that in group A (t = 2.408, P 0.05, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula, abdominal hemorrhage, abdominal infection and gastric retention between the two groups (蠂 ~ 2 0.181 ~ 0.322 ~ 0.603 ~ 0. 001P 0.05). Conclusion it is safe and reliable for the pancreaticoduodenectomy not to place the pancreatic duct supporting tube to reduce the operation time and the hospital stay after operation, and there is no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications.
【学位授予单位】:重庆医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R656
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 路丽鹏,赵聚峰;耳眼用筛状塑料支撑管的制作[J];山西护理杂志;1997年06期
2 于满;;金属支撑管:外源性输尿管梗阻的一种新疗法[J];国外医学(临床放射学分册);1993年03期
3 张方顺,杨序,赵军;双圆头侧孔型泪道吻合支撑管的研制及临床应用[J];眼科研究;2003年02期
4 张方顺,赵军,扬序;双圆头侧孔型泪道吻合支撑管的临床应用[J];中华眼科杂志;2004年01期
5 杨方亮;王新波;王思珍;丁威威;范欣鑫;;升结肠支撑管腹膜炎动物模型的建立[J];肠外与肠内营养;2010年03期
6 邱祯涌,李强,邹树红;支撑管式结肛吻合术的护理[J];青岛医药卫生;1995年12期
7 王骏;膀胱造影术引导双J形输尿管内支撑管逆行置放[J];国外医学(临床放射学分册);1995年05期
8 司鲁民,范飞,周刚;简易弹性鼻孔支撑管的制作及应用[J];实用美容整形外科杂志;2000年02期
9 司鲁民,范飞,周刚;简易弹性鼻孔支撑管的制作与应用[J];中国美容医学;1999年02期
10 杨俊杰;胰管内放置支撑管后的组织学变化(英)[J];国外医学.外科学分册;1995年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 陈荣;李权;傅国如;;横梁支撑管变形开裂失效分析[A];2011年全国失效分析学术会议论文集[C];2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 王权;胰管支撑管引流在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[D];兰州大学;2015年
2 管瑜;充气展开自硬化支撑管的设计与分析[D];浙江大学;2006年
,本文编号:2107550
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2107550.html