当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

直接前入路初次全髋关节置换术后引流放置与否对早期临床疗效的影响

发布时间:2018-07-09 23:06

  本文选题:直接前入路 + 髋关节置换术 ; 参考:《遵义医学院》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:目的:经直接前入路行初次全髋关节置换术(Total Hip Arthroplasty using a Direct Anterior Approach DAA-THA)后,比较放置引流与不放置引流对患者早期疼痛程度、输血率、髋关节活动度、失血量及并发症等临床疗效的影响。方法:采用前瞻性、随机性的对照研究方法,对执行DAA-THA术后放置引流与不放置引流的患者作早期临床疗效对比研究。使用自体血回输机作为引流装置,应用随机分配的方法将25例执行DAA-THA的患者放入引流组,将25例执DAA-THA的患者放入不引流组,共纳入50例髋。观察手术前后大腿根部周径、血红蛋白、红细胞压积、凝血功能、D-2聚体、更换敷料次数、引流量、输血率、疼痛程度、失血量、血肿发生率、瘀斑、血栓发生率、术后住院天数、切口愈合情况、感染发生率、术后下地时间、髋关节活动度等指标,做统计学分析进行比较。结果:在直接前入路初次全髋关节置换术后1d、2d、3d及出院当天放置引流组的髋关节活动度(P0.05)及视觉模拟评分(P0.05)均优于不放置引流组;但术后血红蛋白下降水平则引流组大于不引流组(P=0.031),不放置引流组有2例输血(8%),放置引流组有4例输血(16%);其术后血液丢失总量、术后住院天数、瘀斑、大腿周径差值、更换敷料次数、术后凝血功能、D-2聚体、术后下地时间、拆线时间两组相比较均无明显统计学意义,术后未发现下肢深静脉血栓形成及肺栓塞,均未发现明显血肿形成,两组均无感染,放置引流组和不放置引流组差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:经直接前入路行初次全髋关节置换术,术后引流可以减轻患者术区疼痛感及获得更好的髋关节活动度,但血红蛋白丢失及输血率较不放置引流高,所以权衡利弊,为了使患者术后获得良好早期疗效,建议DAA-THA术后应常规放置引流;另外围手术期合理应用止血药和预防血栓药,术后可以减少相关并发症的发生。
[Abstract]:Objective: total Hip Arthroplasty using a Direct Anterior Approach DAA-THA (Total Hip Arthroplasty using a Direct Anterior Approach DAA-THA) through direct anterior approach was used to compare the degree of pain, blood transfusion rate and hip joint activity between patients with and without drainage. The effect of blood loss and complications. Methods: a prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted to compare the early clinical outcomes of patients with or without drainage after DAA-THA. Using autologous blood transfusion machine as drainage device, 25 patients who performed DAA-THA were put into drainage group by random distribution method, 25 patients with DAA-THA were put into non-drainage group, 50 hips were included. The peripheral diameter of thigh root, hemoglobin, hematocrit, coagulant function and D-2 polymer were observed before and after operation. Dressing change times, drainage rate, blood transfusion rate, pain degree, blood loss, hematoma rate, ecchymosis, thrombus incidence were observed. The hospital stay, wound healing, infection rate, postoperative floor time and hip motion were compared statistically. Results: the hip motion (P0.05) and visual analogue score (P0.05) in the drainage group were better than those in the non-drainage group on the 1st day after the first total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach (P 0.05) and the drainage group on the day of discharge. However, the decrease of hemoglobin level in drainage group was higher than that in non-drainage group (P0. 031), blood transfusion was found in 2 cases (8%) in no drainage group and 4 cases (16%) in drainage group, the total amount of blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days, ecchymosis and thigh diameter difference were observed in the drainage group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in dressing changing times, coagulation function of D-2 polymer after operation, the time of dropping down after operation and the time of removing thread. There was no significant difference between the two groups. No deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism of lower extremities were found after operation, and no obvious hematoma formation was found in the two groups. There was no infection between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the drainage group and the non-drainage group (P0.05). Conclusion: the primary total hip replacement via direct anterior approach can relieve the pain and obtain better hip motion, but the hemoglobin loss and blood transfusion rate are higher than those without drainage. In order to get good early curative effect after operation, it is suggested that drainage should be placed regularly after DAA-THA, and the postoperative complications can be reduced by rational use of hemostatic drugs and thrombus prevention drugs in perioperative period.
【学位授予单位】:遵义医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R687.4

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 徐晓民;;前入路腹膜前无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝64例疗效分析[J];当代医学;2012年01期

2 刘光久;张绍祥;刘正津;谭立文;邱明国;李七渝;李恺;;颈前入路相关结构三维可视化研究[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2006年05期

3 赵宏斌;李超;董飞;;前入路腹膜前无张力疝修补术的临床应用[J];基层医学论坛;2010年23期

4 徐志明,丰育功,刘伟;颞下-经岩前入路的显微外科解剖学研究[J];中华神经医学杂志;2005年08期

5 谢晓峰;闵志钧;张箭平;王长涛;薛冰;刘进军;;预裁剪聚丙烯平片行前入路腹膜前无张力疝修补术16例报告[J];中国实用外科杂志;2008年07期

6 黄磊;;前入路单纯腹膜前修补术式要点[J];上海医学;2011年11期

7 苏杰;吕凯荧;王鑫瑜;冯祯声;高勤革;;前入路腹膜前修补腹股沟疝82例临床分析[J];现代生物医学进展;2012年16期

8 郑晶晶;胡平;吴丹;罗德胜;;经前入路腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝256例分析[J];温州医科大学学报;2014年02期

9 岑刚;吴卫东;;应用3D非编织补片的前入路腹膜前修补技术在临床的应用[J];中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版);2010年01期

10 赵卫,后嘉麟,黄建强,孙学进,李兴国,庞瑞麟,余发昌;经皮颈椎间盘切吸术前入路的应用解剖研究[J];介入放射学杂志;2000年04期

相关会议论文 前9条

1 顾一峰;吴春根;季博青;;腰_5骶_1经皮椎间盘摘除术的侧后入路法和经腹前入路法比较[A];中华医学会第十三届全国放射学大会论文汇编(下册)[C];2006年

2 郑晶晶;胡平;;经前入路腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝的体会(附256例报告)[A];2012年浙江省外科学学术年会论文集[C];2012年

3 王锐;陈春美;杨卫忠;石松生;陈靖;房新蓉;王春华;;颈椎椎间盘突出症颈前入路显微手术治疗[A];2011中华医学会神经外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年

4 陈玺华;胡铭荣;;前入路腹膜前椭圆形复合平片治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究[A];2007年浙江省外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年

5 夏虹;尹庆水;潘刚明;张卓华;昌耘冰;刘晖;廖穗祥;刘景发;;上胸段病变的经胸骨前入路手术治疗[A];第八届全国脊柱脊髓损伤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年

6 孟华;;颈前入路治疗颈椎病术后护理[A];全国第四届骨科护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议论文汇编[C];2002年

7 刘忠;;颈3、4椎间盘突出颈前入路间盘摘除手术治疗(附12例报告)[A];第11届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2003年

8 端木群立;黄东辉;赵琦辉;陆凯;邱小卫;;侧卧体位及前入路对臼杯安置失当和脱位的影响分析[A];浙江省中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会第十二次学术年会、杭州市中医药协会骨伤科专业委员会第一次学术年会暨继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2006年

9 单春燕;;改良Kugel补片开放式腹膜前入路治疗腹股沟疝的手术配合[A];中华护理学会第16届全国手术室护理学术交流会议论文汇编(上册)[C];2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 高西杰;健侧经皮侧前入路穿刺腰4/5椎间盘靶点髓核摘除术[D];泰山医学院;2014年

2 杨天文;直接前入路初次全髋关节置换术后引流放置与否对早期临床疗效的影响[D];遵义医学院;2017年

3 刘金伟;下腰椎腹腔镜侧前入路的应用解剖学研究[D];南方医科大学;2008年



本文编号:2111033

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2111033.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户62e21***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com