当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

轻量型补片和(中)重量型补片在开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后的疗效研究

发布时间:2018-07-17 19:41
【摘要】:目的:比较开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术中,轻量型补片和(中)重量型补片的疗效和术后舒适度(如慢性疼痛、复发率、边缘牵扯感、不适感的发生率)。方法:回顾性研究2011年1月至2014年1月间在我科行腹股沟疝无张力修补术的患者共145例(152侧),随访率91.19%。研究分为轻量型补片组59例(60侧)和中量型补片组86例(92侧)。于术后3月、6月及12月行门诊和电话随访,对比分析两组患者手术前后的慢性疼痛、复发率、边缘牵扯感、舒适度等的发生率。进而,使用Meta分析,系统比较轻量型补片和重量型补片研究中的结果,采用的结局指标有,术后6个月,术后12个月时慢性疼痛,腹股沟区不适,异物感,以及总的复发率。结果:轻量型补片组和中量型补片组术后疝复发率分别为1.67%和1.09%(P=0.762)。在术后3月和6月,二组病例的疼痛发生率、疼痛程度、腹股沟区不适发生率、异物感发生率及边缘牵扯感发生率均无显著差异。术后1年时,轻量型补片组和中量型补片组的疼痛发生率(8.51%vs 12.50%)、异物感发生率(4.26%vs 12.50%)、VAS疼痛评分均值[(0.19±0.68)vs(0.21±0.71)]及边缘牵扯感(6.38%vs5.35%)均无显著性差异。但在术后腹股沟区不适发生率上,轻量型补片组为17.02%,显著优于中量型补片组的37.50%(P=0.021)。进而,行文献资料的分析和归纳。检索2000年-2014年的Pubmed,Ebsco,Embase,Web of Science数据库内相关文献。总共有10篇包含2322名患者的RCT文献适合于我们的Meta分析研究。在固定效应模型中,轻量型补片组和(中)重量型补片组复发率没有统计学差异[OR=1.34,95%CI(0.74~2.43),P=0.33]。根据孔径大小的差异大于或小于1mm,分为Group A和Group B,进一步的分层分析显示,在孔径大小差异大的亚组中,轻量型补片相较于重量型补片,在12个月慢性疼痛发生率上较低[OR=0.65,95%CI(0.47~0.90),P=0.01]。结论:轻量型补片在腹股沟疝无张力修补术的应用是安全有效,并且不增加术后复发率。1年期的随访结果显示轻量型补片组的腹股沟区不适发生率显著低于中量型补片组。相较于补片重量而言,网孔大小对开放式腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛、腹股沟区不适、异物感方面或更具重要影响。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the efficacy and comfort of open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with light and (medium) weight patch (such as chronic pain, recurrence rate, marginal involvement and discomfort). Methods: a retrospective study of 145 cases (152 sides) of inguinal hernia tension-free repair from January 2011 to January 2014 was performed. The follow-up rate was 91.19. 59 cases (60 sides) and 86 cases (92 sides) were divided into two groups: light patch group (n = 59) and medium dose group (n = 86). After 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation, outpatient and telephone follow-up were performed to compare the incidence of chronic pain, recurrence rate, marginal involvement and comfort between the two groups before and after operation. Then, Meta-analysis was used to systematically compare the results of lightweight patch and weight patch. The outcome indexes were chronic pain, groin discomfort, foreign body sensation and total recurrence rate at 6 months after operation and 12 months after operation. Results: the recurrence rate of hernia was 1.67% and 1.09% in the light and medium dose group respectively (P0. 762). There was no significant difference in the incidence of pain, the degree of pain, the incidence of inguinal discomfort, the incidence of foreign body sensation and the incidence of marginal involvement between the two groups at 3 and 6 months after operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pain (8.51%vs 12.50%), foreign body sensation (4.26%vs 12.50%) and marginal involvement (6.38 vs 5.35%) in the light and moderate dose groups at 1 year after operation. The mean score of pain score was (0.19 卤0.68) vs (0.21 卤0.71) and the marginal involvement was (6.38 vs 5.35%). However, the incidence of postoperative discomfort in inguinal area was 17.022 in the light dose patch group, which was significantly higher than that in the medium dose patch group (37. 50%) (P0. 021). Then, the analysis and induction of the literature. To search the relevant literature in the Pubmedus Ebscobase Web of Science database from 2000 to 2014. A total of 10 RCT articles covering 2322 patients were suitable for our meta-analysis study. In the fixed effect model, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the light dose patch group and the (middle) weight supplement group [ORA 1.34N 95 CI (0.742.43) Pao 0.33]. Group A and Group B were divided into Group A and Group B according to the difference of aperture size, and further stratification analysis showed that the incidence of chronic pain was lower in the subgroup with large difference in aperture size than that in the weight patch [OR0.65% 95% CI (0.470.90) P0.01]. Conclusion: the application of lightweight patch in inguinal hernia tension-free repair is safe and effective, and does not increase the recurrence rate. The results of 1-year follow-up showed that the incidence of inguinal discomfort in the light patch group was significantly lower than that in the moderate dose patch group. Compared with the weight of the patch, the size of the mesh may play a more important role in chronic pain, groin discomfort and foreign body sensation after open inguinal hernioplasty.
【学位授予单位】:上海交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R656.21

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 丁涛;匡勇军;夏德明;马达;;轻量型补片在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的临床应用[J];中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版);2013年01期

2 蔡楚东;方喜;张俊烁;彭淮都;;轻量型和重量型补片在腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的临床对照研究[J];岭南现代临床外科;2013年05期

3 陈慧永;;轻量型网塞在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的优势和应用价值[J];中国现代药物应用;2014年02期

4 张杨;查晓光;吴家照;李煜;滕安宝;;轻量型部分可吸收网塞在腹股沟疝修补中的运用[J];安徽医学;2011年08期

5 黄磊;唐健雄;蔡昭;陈革;李亿程;袁祖荣;;轻量型网塞在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J];外科理论与实践;2008年06期

6 程韬;李俊生;;重量型补片与轻量型补片应用于腹股沟疝修补术的Meta分析[J];中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版);2011年02期

7 谭永辉;王雪;;轻量型网片与重量型网片治疗腹股沟疝的临床分析[J];中国民族民间医药;2011年17期

8 曾辉;郑本波;李锋;许进;刘山;;Ultrapro轻量型网片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J];中国普外基础与临床杂志;2012年01期

9 俞丹松;陈佰文;周新华;李宏;;不同补片在腹膜前腹股沟疝修补中的应用效果比较[J];现代实用医学;2013年12期

10 Khan LR;Liong S;de Beaux AC;Kumar S;Nixon SJ;;轻量型网片可以提高腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术后的功能结局[J];中国实用外科杂志;2010年07期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 周斌;徐鲁白;王继生;蔡景理;陈亦明;林孝坤;殷凯;许家昒;;轻量型补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的临床应用[A];2011年浙江省微创外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 燕东;轻量型网片应用于Lichtenstein疝修补术长期疗效的系统评价和Meta分析[D];兰州大学;2015年

2 马怀冲;轻量型算术运算电路单元设计与FPGA实现[D];北京交通大学;2016年

3 李渊;轻量型网片在腹股沟疝三明治式修补中的应用[D];兰州大学;2016年

4 杨帆;轻量型补片和(中)重量型补片在开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术后的疗效研究[D];上海交通大学;2015年

5 刘俊;超普轻量型补片(UPP)生物相容性的研究[D];遵义医学院;2011年

6 李永强;不同类型疝修补网片在大鼠体内皱缩及异物反应的对比研究[D];河北医科大学;2014年



本文编号:2130728

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2130728.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户915f9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com