新鲜羊膜对周围神经损伤修复影响的实验研究
[Abstract]:Objective: peripheral nerve injury is a common disabling disease in the clinic, which directly damages the labor resources and causes a heavy burden on social and family life. The regeneration of peripheral nerve injury is affected by many factors, and the microenvironment and the local scar at the anastomotic stoma seriously affect the repair effect after the nerve injury. For this reason, The improvement of local microenvironment and reduction of local scar is beneficial to the regeneration of peripheral nerve and the recovery of nerve function. The amniotic membrane has semimodialysis, ensures the smooth transmission of nutrients, promotes the proliferation of Schwann cells, accelerates the growth of the nerve axons, inhibits the biological activity of the peripheral fibroblasts, limits the surrounding tissue to invade the nerve broken ends and inhibits the surrounding tissue. In this experiment, the rat sciatic nerve injury model was constructed. The rat model of sciatic nerve injury was constructed, the nerve kissing was carried out under the microscope, and the fresh amniotic membrane was wrapped in the kissing place. The indexes of the fresh sheep were evaluated through gross observation, light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, neurophysiological test, and the sciatic nerve function index. The effect of membrane on regeneration of peripheral nerve injury. Methods: 60 healthy SD rats, male and female, 220 gram of body weight, 220 gram of body weight were used to prepare the acute injury model of the sciatic nerve in one side of the leg. The group of A (repaired the nerve after the nerve was repaired with the fresh amniotic membrane), and the group B (repair the nerve after the nerve membrane was wrapped with the anastomosis), and the C group (repair) The three groups, 20 rats in each group, were observed in 2,4,8 and 12 weeks after operation, with light microscopy and immunohistochemical staining (the expression of S-100 protein in the nerve tissue); the transmission electron microscopy was performed at the 4,8,12 weeks after the operation, and the axon imaging analysis (counting the number of myelinated nerve fibers, axon diameter and the thickness of myelin sheath) were observed, respectively. Combined muscle action potential detection (measuring and recording latency, amplitude and nerve conduction velocity) and calculating the sciatic nerve function index and its recovery rate. All data were statistically processed. Results: gross observation: three groups of rats were not infected after operation, 7 days after the incision was cut, the incision was healed, and the three groups of rats were 2 weeks after operation. There was a slight swelling of the lower extremities, decreased activity obviously and the limp.2 weeks after the swelling, the mental state and diet gradually resumed. The limping time of the group of A and B rats was shorter than that of the C group, and the amount of activity recovered earlier.A. The number of foot ulcers in the foot and toe of the B group and the C group was less and the recovery time was shorter. The amniotic membrane, the biofilm partially absorbed, and the large part of the biofilm after 2 weeks after the operation. Absorption, 8 weeks completely absorbed group.A, group B nerve and surrounding tissue slightly adhesions and adhesion more loose, activity can be.C group nerve and surrounding tissue widely close adhesion, blunt not easy to separate, poor activity. After 2,4,8,12 week A group, B group nerve recovery is obviously better than the C group. Electron microscope observation: 4 weeks A, B, C three groups of nerve fibers after the operation The regeneration was not obvious, and the lamellar structure was not clear. 8 weeks after the operation, 12 weeks A, the B group had more nerve regeneration than the C group, the thickness of the myelin sheath was thicker, the lamellar structure was clearer and the diameter of the axon was greater. The expression and distribution of S-100 protein in the group of B were better than that of the simultaneous C group. The axonal image analysis: A, B group of distal nerve anastomoses had medullary God. The diameter of the fibers, the thickness of myelin sheath and the number of myelinated nerve fibers in the cross section were better than those in the C group, and the results were statistically significant (P0.05). The neurophysiological tests showed that the latency of evoked potential, amplitude and conduction velocity of the postoperative lateral nerve were detected: A, the latency of the group B was shorter, the amplitude of wave was higher and the nerve conduction velocity was faster, and the results were statistically significant. (P0.05) the sciatic nerve function index: the function index of the sciatic nerve in group A and group B was significantly higher than that of the group C at the same time. There was a significant difference (P0.05). Conclusion: the amniotic membrane as a biological material has a better effect on the repair of peripheral nerve injury. It can reduce the adhesion of the damaged nerve to the surrounding tissue and reduce the nerve anastomosis. Scar formation; can promote nerve fiber regeneration, axon diameter increased, myelin thickening; can reduce the inflammation of nerve incision, immune response.
【学位授予单位】:河北医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R651.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 牛忠英;周围神经损伤诊治失误18例分析[J];中医正骨;2002年06期
2 汪瑞东,武从显,汪爱群;综合治疗慢性周围神经损伤[J];河南医药信息;2003年02期
3 顾玉东;提高周围神经损伤的诊治水平[J];中华创伤骨科杂志;2003年01期
4 李志勇,杨象民,王树荣;中药治疗周围神经损伤的研究进展[J];时珍国医国药;2004年03期
5 顾玉东;周围神经损伤诊治的几个基本问题[J];医学临床研究;2004年05期
6 李文军,顾玉东;周围神经损伤后手部感觉恢复的研究进展[J];复旦学报(医学版);2004年05期
7 郑林丰;易西南;;周围神经损伤的再生与修复的哲学启示[J];创伤外科杂志;2006年01期
8 刘小林;;我国周围神经损伤修复研究现状与趋势[J];中国修复重建外科杂志;2008年09期
9 颜华;张惠佳;;中药治疗周围神经损伤的研究进展[J];中医药导报;2008年08期
10 刘恒;曹瑞治;;血管内皮生长因子与周围神经损伤[J];广东医学;2009年07期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 杨佩君;蒋斌;王美芬;陈凯敏;;四肢周围神经损伤的康复[A];中国康复医学会第四届会员代表大会暨第三届中国康复医学学术大会论文汇编[C];2001年
2 李卓东;苏佳灿;曹烈虎;张春才;;地震中周围神经损伤的野战诊治体会[A];第十六届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会暨中西医结合手法治疗骨伤科疾病新进展学习班论文汇编[C];2008年
3 张晓杰;;周围神经损伤的护理[A];吉林省护理学会外科学护理分会第十五次学术会议论文汇编[C];2011年
4 姜加权;陈金华;;猪周围神经损伤影像技术探讨[A];2010中华医学会影像技术分会第十八次全国学术大会论文集[C];2010年
5 傅炳峨;黄耀添;胡蕴玉;殷琦;;晚期周围神经损伤的退变与再生实验和临床研究[A];西部大开发 科教先行与可持续发展——中国科协2000年学术年会文集[C];2000年
6 陈银海;赖蕴珠;姚红华;;周围神经损伤的强度时间曲线分析[A];中国康复医学会第四届会员代表大会暨第三届中国康复医学学术大会论文汇编[C];2001年
7 周丰慧;;周围神经损伤的康复治疗[A];中国康复医学会第四届会员代表大会暨第三届中国康复医学学术大会论文汇编[C];2001年
8 陈银海;赖蕴珠;姚红华;;周围神经损伤的强度时间曲线分析[A];中国康复医学会第三次康复治疗学术大会论文汇编[C];2002年
9 陈海啸;;周围神经损伤修复研究进展[A];2005年浙江省骨科学术会议论文汇编[C];2005年
10 张晓茹;;肌电生物反馈治疗周围神经损伤11例[A];肢体伤残康复与护理学术论文集[C];1995年
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 山东青岛 戴源;周围神经损伤早期的康复[N];上海中医药报;2012年
2 张中桥;晚期周围神经损伤有修复价值[N];中国医药报;2002年
3 北京大学第一医院儿科副教授 姜玉武;周围神经损伤须及时综合治疗[N];健康报;2008年
4 上海长海医院康复医学科 翟金萍;周围神经损伤的生物反馈疗法[N];上海中医药报;2012年
5 整理 马善治 刘渝松;右前臂周围神经损伤案[N];中国中医药报;2013年
6 本报记者 朱国旺;使羊周围神经再生8.5厘米[N];中国医药报;2002年
7 刘道安;电针对周围神经损伤修复有促进作用[N];中国医药报;2005年
8 通讯员 张献怀;神经断了可以移植修复[N];中国消费者报;2004年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 刘海飞;神经寄养修复周围神经损伤的疗效和分子机制研究[D];复旦大学;2014年
2 何纯青;地震后周围神经损伤的分类分级诊治及晚期手术治疗研究[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2014年
3 张伟;组织工程化人工神经修复长节段周围神经损伤的实验研究[D];第二军医大学;2011年
4 佟帅;针刺治疗周围神经损伤机理的实验研究[D];黑龙江中医药大学;2002年
5 杨光;骨髓间充质干细胞修复大鼠周围神经损伤的实验研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
6 李桂石;大鼠周围神经损伤后脊髓前角运动神经元变化的动态观察[D];天津医科大学;2013年
7 孙鸿斌;Ca~(2+)对周围神经损伤后运动神经元作用的实验研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
8 杜旭;电针对周围神经损伤大鼠神经生长导向因子的影响研究[D];成都中医药大学;2012年
9 殷琦;周围神经损伤后神经、肌肉运动终板退变及再生的临床、实验研究[D];第四军医大学;1991年
10 薛金伟;钙通道阻滞剂对周围神经损伤后瘢痕形成抑制作用的实验研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 寇文冠;新鲜羊膜对周围神经损伤修复影响的实验研究[D];河北医科大学;2015年
2 郭志远;应用iTRAQ技术研究周围神经感觉和运动束Wallerian变性前后的差异表达蛋白[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2015年
3 张栋;基于“活血通络方外洗治疗化疗所致周围神经损伤的多中心随机双盲对照临床试验”的质量控制研究[D];中国中医科学院;2015年
4 李翔;光化学免缝合技术结合肠衣在坐骨神经修复中的应用研究[D];蚌埠医学院;2015年
5 王维;颅脑损伤对周围神经损伤修复的影响[D];承德医学院;2015年
6 王冠;三种物理方法促进兔周围神经损伤后修复的对比研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
7 何纯青;5.12汶川地震所致周围神经损伤的调查与治疗研究[D];中国人民解放军军医进修学院;2011年
8 高杨;微波对实验性大鼠周围神经损伤后功能恢复的影响[D];大连医科大学;2011年
9 刘燕荣;鼠神经生长因子治疗周围神经损伤的系统评价[D];山西医科大学;2013年
10 李洪梅;针康法治疗上肢周围神经损伤的临床观察[D];黑龙江中医药大学;2012年
,本文编号:2172568
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2172568.html