不同接骨板组合治疗干骺端粉碎股骨远端骨折的动物实验
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the curative effect of single plate and different combination of double plate in the treatment of metaphyseal comminuted distal femur fracture, to provide research direction for large sample size experiment and to provide guidance for clinical treatment. Methods A model of bilateral distal femoral comminuted fracture was established in 5 healthy pigs (Bama miniature pig) [International Institute of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) classified as 33-C2.3 type]. The control group was divided into five groups: the control group (n = 1) was fixed with a single lateral anatomic locking plate, the control group (n = 2) with a locked reconstruction plate and a control group (n = 2), each pig side of the hind limb was fixed with a lateral anatomic locking plate (LLP). The contralateral hindlimb was fixed with lateral anatomical locking plate, medial reconstruction plate, left and right side randomly, two of them were in locking compression plate group and common compression group, and each pig was fixed with lateral anatomical locking plate on the medial side of the posterior limb. The contralateral hindlimb was fixed with lateral anatomic locking plate medial compression plate. The fracture healing and internal fixation loosening were observed by X-ray radiography at 4 ~ 8 ~ 12 weeks postoperatively. Experimental pigs were killed 12 weeks after operation and the maximum anteroposterior diameter of callus was measured on lateral X-ray films of distal femur. All femur specimens were subjected to vertical compression experiment after removal of internal fixation. The maximum axial compression displacement was recorded and the average axial stiffness was calculated. Results all 5 pigs survived, fracture healed, no infection occurred and internal fixation failed. In the gross specimens, the mean value of the maximum anteroposterior diameter of callus in each double plate group was higher than that in the single plate group, and the largest (5.02cm) in the locked reconstruction plate group and the smallest (4.16cm) in the locking compression plate group. In the vertical compression experiment, the mean value of maximum axial compression displacement of both hind limbs of pigs in each double plate group was lower than that of single plate group, and the mean axial stiffness of each double plate group was higher than that of single plate group. In the double plate group, The maximum axial compression displacement (2.50mm) and average axial stiffness (1 200.71N/mm) of both hind limbs were the smallest (2.50mm) and the maximum axial compression displacement (2. 91 mm), level) of both hind limbs in the LRP group and the normal compression plate group respectively. The mean value of mean axial stiffness is minimum (1 032.76N/mm). Conclusion double plate fixation is an ideal method for the treatment of metaphyseal comminuted distal femur fracture. The lateral anatomic locking plate and the medial locking reconstruction plate may be the most beneficial to the healing of the fracture.
【作者单位】: 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院骨科;
【分类号】:R687.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 付鹏军,尹锐峰,张超远,宋应超;股骨远端骨折的临床治疗[J];开封医专学报;2000年04期
2 丁保大;摩托车伤导致股骨远端骨折[J];浙江创伤外科;2001年03期
3 岳红卫;李国顺;何涛;王桂新;;逆行交锁髓内钉固定治疗股骨远端骨折56例报告[J];山东医药;2005年36期
4 关玉成,季明华,王鑫,许刚;动力髁治疗股骨远端骨折28例临床分析[J];西北国防医学杂志;2005年02期
5 刘新河;吕玉林;何明峰;赵勇兵;张贻超;傅国红;;不同术式治疗股骨远端骨折利弊分析[J];实用医药杂志;2006年05期
6 肖保欣;;股骨远端骨折的手术治疗[J];临床骨科杂志;2008年04期
7 赵琳;黄昌林;;对股骨远端骨折固定方法的回顾性分析[J];人民军医;2009年05期
8 宋锁行;;股骨逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨远端骨折[J];临床医药实践;2012年04期
9 党培业;王彦东;刘增亮;王万富;;先天性髋关节脱位术后股骨远端骨折的原因分析[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2012年08期
10 刘晓冬,朱文存,朱兴元,田顺林,陈太林;C型股骨远端骨折的手术治疗[J];中国矫形外科杂志;1998年05期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 王传舜;陶杰;王秋根;高伟;李豪青;黄建华;陶杰;李凡;张磊;马春辉;吴小峰;周孜辉;;股骨远端骨折治疗的选择[A];第二届泛长江流域骨科新进展研讨会暨上颈椎伤病新理论新技术学习班论文汇编[C];2008年
2 刘波;田润;周丽灵;;40例股骨远端骨折不同治疗方法疗效观察[A];2006年贵州省医学会骨科学分会学术年会论文汇编[C];2006年
3 秦文;龚七一;曾月东;;中老年股骨远端骨折的治疗探讨[A];2007年贵州省医学会骨科学分会学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
4 杨辉;唐三元;詹鹏;邢署;张宇;束志勇;李远辉;;股骨远端骨折两种固定方法对比研究[A];第七届全国创伤学术会议暨2009海峡两岸创伤医学论坛论文汇编[C];2009年
5 陈湛;蔡国宏;;股骨远端骨折两种内固定疗效比较[A];全国中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会第十二次学术年会浙江省中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会第十次学术年会论文汇编[C];2004年
6 施慧鹏;于晓雯;蒋建新;高洪;章振林;张长青;曾炳芳;;应用伤害控制论治疗骨质疏松性股骨远端骨折[A];中华医学会第三次全国骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病学术会议暨骨质疏松诊断技术继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2004年
7 赵鸣扬;车晓菊;岳世胜;;股骨远端骨折的临床治疗[A];2007年贵州省医学会骨科学分会学术年会论文汇编[C];2007年
8 曾少规;屠文华;周全胜;徐建春;;锁定钢板手术治疗股骨远端骨折12例分析[A];2008年浙江省骨科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2008年
9 杨辉;唐三元;詹鹏;邢署;张宇;束志勇;李远辉;;股骨远端骨折两种固定方法对比研究[A];第十九届中国康协肢残康复学术年会论文选集[C];2010年
10 陈辉进;杨宝根;雷文涛;平立原;;股骨远端骨折和逆向髓内钉治疗[A];浙江省中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会第十一次学术年会暨省级继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2005年
,本文编号:2255316
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2255316.html