当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

神经阻滞联合干扰电疗法治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的临床观察

发布时间:2018-10-13 10:27
【摘要】:目的:本文主要观察并探讨神经阻滞联合干扰电疗法治疗带状疱疹后遗肋间神经痛(postherpetic intercostal neuralgia,PHN)的有效性及安全性。方法:选择我院疼痛门诊收治的PHN患者60例,随机分为A(对照组)、B(治疗组),每组30例。A组行口服普瑞巴林加相应部位的肋间神经阻滞治疗;B组在同样药物的基础上作相应肋间神经阻滞联合干扰电疗法。分别于治疗前、治疗后1周、治疗后8周观察并记录两组患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、睡眠质量评分(QS)以及不良反应的发生情况。两组患者的近期和远期疗效可通过两种评分来综合比较。结果:两组患者在性别、年龄、病程、治疗前VAS评分及QS评分等一般资料的比较上,差异无统计学意义(P0.05),具有可比性。与治疗前比较,治疗后1周和治疗后8周两组患者的VAS及QS评分均有所降低,且治疗后1周及治疗后8周B组的VAS及QS评分均明显低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。远期(8周后)综合疗效比较中可以得出,两组患者的治疗总有效率均为100%,A组显效率为70%(21/30),B组显效率为93%(28/30)。与B组相比,A组显效率明显降低,差异有统计学意义(χ2=1.92 P0.05)。两组患者不良反应的记录中,A组有3例患者,B组有2例患者肋间神经阻滞后出现头晕症状,休息数分钟后缓解,无感染、呼吸困难、血气胸的发生。两组患者在干扰电治疗中均无皮肤刺激反应和皮肤烧灼等不良反应的发生。结论:神经阻滞联合干扰电疗法能更有效的缓解或解除PHN患者的痛苦,效果更为持久,精神状态也能很好的改善,生活质量也有很大的提高,临床上值得推荐应用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the efficacy and safety of nerve block combined with interference electrotherapy in the treatment of intercostal neuralgia after herpes zoster. Methods: sixty patients with PHN were selected from pain outpatient department in our hospital. Group A (control group, 30 cases) were randomly divided into two groups: group A (group A) and group B (group B) were given intercostal nerve block combined with intercostal nerve block on the basis of the same drug. Visual analogue score (VAS),) sleep quality score (QS) and adverse reaction (ADR) were observed and recorded before treatment 1 week after treatment and 8 weeks after treatment. The short-term and long-term outcomes of the two groups can be comprehensively compared by two scores. Results: there was no significant difference in sex, age, course of disease, VAS score and QS score between the two groups (P0.05). The scores of VAS and QS in group B were significantly lower than those in group A 1 week after treatment and 8 weeks after treatment, and the scores of VAS and QS in group B were significantly lower than those in group A at 1 week and 8 weeks after treatment (P0.05). The long-term (8 weeks later) comprehensive efficacy comparison showed that the total effective rate of both groups was 70% in group A (93%) in group 21 / 30), B (28 / 30). Compared with group B, the effective rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B (蠂 2 1.92 P 0.05). There were 3 cases in group A and 2 cases in group B with dizziness after intercostal nerve block. The symptoms were relieved after a few minutes rest, no infection, dyspnea and hemopneumothorax occurred. There were no adverse reactions such as skin irritation and skin cauterization in both groups. Conclusion: nerve block combined with interference therapy can alleviate or relieve the pain of PHN more effectively, the effect is more lasting, the mental state can also be improved, and the quality of life is also greatly improved, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.
【学位授予单位】:蚌埠医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R614

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张玉红;张永红;肖春才;彭希亮;郑战伟;倪文琼;;神经阻滞联合臭氧治疗带状疱疹的疗效观察[J];中国现代医学杂志;2016年07期

2 卢蓉;;普瑞巴林联合神经阻滞治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效[J];中国实用神经疾病杂志;2016年03期

3 韩杨;;中频电配合金黄散外敷治疗膝关节骨性关节炎疗效观察[J];基层医学论坛;2016年01期

4 许旭东;商建飞;张爱萍;盛志锋;;神经阻滞联合中药口服治疗老年带状疱疹后遗神经痛的疗效观察[J];中西医结合心血管病电子杂志;2015年15期

5 史睿亭;徐泽华;贾淑贤;曹宪宪;李维维;;浅析带状疱疹后遗神经痛的发病机制[J];当代医药论丛;2015年06期

6 王文珠;王冉;刘建;杨生;;背根神经节脉冲射频刺激联合普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的临床疗效[J];临床麻醉学杂志;2014年07期

7 宫本晶;王志刚;;PCIA复合神经阻滞在带状疱疹后神经痛治疗的应用[J];广西医科大学学报;2014年03期

8 黄剑平;许立民;;高压氧治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的研究进展[J];中国临床新医学;2014年02期

9 董均成;;干扰电 牵引 蜡疗 电针联合治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J];中国临床新医学;2013年07期

10 王新梅;吕雅潇;苏春英;徐峰;;电脑中频联合更昔洛韦治疗带状疱疹疗效观察[J];中国麻风皮肤病杂志;2012年09期



本文编号:2268279

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2268279.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户cc425***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com