不同脾蒂血管离断法在腹腔镜下脾切除术中的对比研究
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the advantages and limitations of using secondary pedicle vascular dissection (SSPD) in laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) compared with the traditional (PSPD) method of primary pedicle splenectomy. The effect of two different methods on the immune function of patients was compared. Method 1. The clinical data of 85 patients with LS from October 2012 to September 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the size of spleen. Among 25 patients with giant spleen, 13 cases were treated with PSPD method, 12 cases with SSPD method, 28 cases with PSPD method and 32 cases with SSPD method. By comparing the data of patients with LS during perioperative period, the curative effect and economic benefit of the two methods were analyzed. 2. From January 2015 to September 2016, 23 patients with normal or normal immune function were divided into two groups according to the operative methods used in LS. 11 cases were treated with PSPD and 12 cases with SSPD. The changes of immune-related indexes before and after LS operation were detected, and the effects of two different methods on human immune function were analyzed. Result 1. Of the 85 patients, 80 had completed the conversion of LS,5 to open surgery. In the giant spleen group, the transfer rates of LS patients with PSPD and SSPD were 7.9% and 33.3%, respectively. The incidence of complications were 38.46% and 16.67%, respectively. The operative time was 170.35 卤58.36min and 260.43 卤98.46 minutes, respectively. Intraoperative bleeding was 132.5 卤58.65mL and 245.5 卤100.85mL, postoperative hospitalization time was 4.5 卤1.3days and 7.8 卤3.52days, blood transfusion volume was 1.53 卤1.02U and 3.28 卤1.48U, respectively. The cost of operation was 12856.76 卤1258.53 yuan and 8685.6 卤923.64 yuan respectively, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05). In normal or medium sized spleen group, there was no significant difference in other indexes except complications and operation cost (P0.05). The incidence of splenic fever and pancreatic fistula after LS with PSPD and SSPD were significantly different between the two groups. 2. 2. In the two groups with different methods, the content of IgM,IgA,C4 decreased after operation. The level of Ig M decreased significantly after operation, the degree of the decrease was significant, and did not return to normal level 5 days after operation, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P0.05). In the PSPD group, the level of IgG,C3 decreased significantly at 1 day after operation and returned to normal at 5 days after operation. In the SSPD group, the level of IgG,C3 decreased at 1 day after operation and returned to normal at 3 days after operation, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion SSPD method can reduce the incidence of splenic fever and pancreatic fistula, and reduce the cost of operation. It is suitable for LS. of normal or moderate spleen. However, because of its high transfer rate and high surgical risk, it is not suitable for patients with giant spleen. When LS was performed, SSPD method was less harmful than PSPD method, and the recovery of immunosuppression after operation was faster.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R657.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 Mu-Xing Li;Xu-Feng Zhang;Zheng-Wen Liu;Yi Lv;;Risk factors and clinical characteristics of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis[J];Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International;2013年05期
2 Tsutomu Namikawa;Hiroyuki Kitagawa;Jun Iwabu;Michiya Kobayashi;Manabu Matsumoto;Kazuhiro Hanazaki;;Laparoscopic splenectomy for splenic hamartoma:Case management and clinical consequences[J];World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;2010年04期
3 张祥东;杨玲;;门静脉高压症脾切除术后持续性发热46例分析[J];山西医药杂志(下半月刊);2009年09期
4 蔡秀军,梁霄,虞洪,孙晓东,陈继达,周振旭,彭淑牖;腹腔镜下二级脾蒂离断法脾脏切除术[J];中国实用外科杂志;2003年11期
5 张庆尧,李克军;腹腔镜胆囊切除术对机体免疫球蛋白、补体及CRP的影响[J];腹腔镜外科杂志;2003年03期
6 张建萍,卢丹,郑平,王维,吉彤珍,舒明炎;腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术对机体免疫功能影响的比较研究[J];实用妇产科杂志;2002年02期
7 谭敏,迕羲彦,吴志棉,渡部宜久,罔田昌羲;腹腔镜技术在脾脏切除术中的应用[J];中华外科杂志;2001年08期
8 彭淑牖,彭承宏,陈力,吴育连,郑放,蔡秀军,牟一平,沈宏伟,刘颖斌,虞志刚;避免损伤胰尾的巨脾切除术—二级脾蒂离断法[J];中国实用外科杂志;1999年12期
9 胡三元,姜希宏,张楠,刘风军;经腹腔镜脾切除术的临床应用[J];中华消化内镜杂志;1998年02期
10 王跃东,李立波,RoblesA.E.,黄金文,王一红,袁晓明;腹腔镜脾切除术[J];中华外科杂志;1997年09期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 瓦沙比;腹腔镜脾切除术与开腹脾切除术的基础与临床动态对比研究[D];华中科技大学;2011年
,本文编号:2297399
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2297399.html