腰椎微创棘突间撑开系统的实验研究
[Abstract]:Objective: 1. To evaluate the effect of lumbar minimally invasive interspinous process distraction system on biomechanical properties of implanted and adjacent segments. To evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of lumbar minimally invasive interspinous process distraction system in animal models. Methods: 1. Using CT data of a healthy adult volunteer, a finite element model of normal lumbar vertebrae and a minimally invasive interspinous protruding system were established. The axial load of 400N and the torque load of 1ON m in four directions of forward flexion / extension / lateral bending / torsion were applied to compare the range of motion and maximum stress of intervertebral disc between L4C5 and adjacent segments, and observe the stress distribution of spinous process and distractor of L4C5. 2. Four fresh lumbar vertebrae cadavers (L2-S1) were immobilized in the MotionAnalysis optical motion capture system with a minimally invasive spinous process protruding system. The pure torque of 8N m was applied in the four directions of flexion / extension / lateral bending / rotation. The changes of the activity of L4 ~ (5) segment and adjacent segment were compared with that of L4 ~ (5) segment and adjacent segment. 3. The intervertebral foramen diameter, transverse diameter of intervertebral foramen, anterior height of intervertebral disc and posterior height of intervertebral disc were compared in 8 25-30kg miniature pigs (25-30kg) by lumbar minimally invasive interspinous process protruding system in the intervertebral foramen diameter, transverse diameter of intervertebral foramen, anterior height of intervertebral disc and posterior height of intervertebral disc. To observe the procedure of placement of distraction system, the results of blood test after operation and the neurological abnormality in miniature pigs. Results: 1. In the finite element model of lumbar minimally invasive interspinous process distraction system, the range of motion and the maximum stress of intervertebral disc decreased by 71.4% and 83.4%, respectively. There was no significant change in the range of motion and the maximum stress of intervertebral disc in the flexion / lateral bending / rotation motion, and no significant change in the parameters in the four directions of adjacent segments. The maximum stress of L _ 4 spinous process is 56.8 Mpa,L5 and the maximum stress is 36.5 Mpa, during extension. The maximum stress is 36.0Mpa.2. Fresh cadaveric lumbar vertebrae specimens were implanted with a minimally invasive interspinous process distraction system, and the activity of L4L 5 segments decreased significantly during extension (t = -3.444, P = 0.009). There was no significant difference in activity between the two groups during flexion / lateral bending / torsion (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the activity of adjacent segments in four directions (P0.05). Eight Bama miniature pig models were successfully implanted into the lumbar spine minimally invasive interspinous process distraction system. After operation, the diameter of intervertebral foramen in L4 / 5 was significantly increased (t = 2.214), the transverse diameter of intervertebral foramen was significantly increased (t = 1.824, P = 0.012), and the height of intervertebral disc was significantly increased (t = 2.441U, P = 0.029). There was no significant difference in anterior intervertebral disc height (t = 0.691P = 0.501). Normal blood test, good activity and no neurological symptoms. Conclusion: the application of lumbar minimally invasive interspinous process distraction system is safe and feasible. It can effectively limit the extension motion of the inserted segment and increase the anatomical parameters such as the diameter of intervertebral foramen, transverse diameter and the height of the intervertebral disc. It can reduce the clinical symptoms of lumbar degenerative disease.
【学位授予单位】:中国人民解放军医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R687.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜宁川,程尚谟,罗洪浪;先天性腰椎融合一例[J];放射学实践;2002年02期
2 潘滔;;腰椎融合技术相关问题的临床问答[J];中国组织工程研究与临床康复;2009年39期
3 孙永生;梁朝;温建民;;腰椎融合及其临床应用策略[J];中华临床医师杂志(电子版);2011年16期
4 徐云杉;王宸;;腰椎融合术术式进展[J];东南大学学报(医学版);2013年02期
5 葛鹏;申才良;;腰椎融合器材料的发展、现状和进展[J];北方药学;2013年05期
6 姜宇;朱国兴;杨玉生;;肥胖和正常体质量腰椎融合患者并发症的比较[J];中国组织工程研究;2013年22期
7 刘列华;兰阳军;周强;;腰椎融合手术方式的历史与进展[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2013年24期
8 段向东;邵仲达;谢坤南;王志强;;经皮360°轴向腰椎融合技术的研究进展[J];中国修复重建外科杂志;2009年08期
9 ;第二届首都骨科高峰论坛“腰椎外科前沿与焦点”通知[J];实用骨科杂志;2010年08期
10 ;第二届首都骨科高峰论坛“腰椎外科前沿与焦点”通知[J];脊柱外科杂志;2010年04期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 赵杰;;腰椎融合/非融合术:你选择谁?[A];浙江省中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会第十四次学术年会暨省级继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2008年
2 王姝南;孟令华;韩婷;田甜;刘彩霞;吴莉莉;冀秀明;于伟娜;;帕瑞昔布钠在腰椎融合术后镇痛效果及不良反应的临床研究[A];第21届中国康协肢残康复学术年会暨第二届“泰山杯”全国骨科青年科技创新论坛论文摘要[C];2012年
3 张玉良;任忠明;周杨;王海东;裴斐;;TLIF手术中两种椎间融合器的疗效分析[A];浙江省中西医结合学会骨伤科专业委员会第十四次学术年会暨省级继续教育学习班论文汇编[C];2008年
4 臧加成;马信龙;王涛;马剑雄;田鹏;韩超;;单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定在短节段腰椎融合手术中疗效比较的Meta分析[A];第十九届全国中西医结合骨伤科学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2012年
5 李光美;修玉才;顾少光;刘志强;李文龙;杨明星;;腰椎滑脱的治疗分析[A];中国骨伤发展战略高层论坛暨中西医结合骨伤学术大会论文集[C];2004年
6 赵斌修;陈晓亮;王坤正;;156例退变性腰椎疾患手术治疗的临床疗效分析[A];第八届全国脊柱脊髓损伤学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 张献怀;注射亚甲蓝治椎间盘源性下腰痛初显疗效[N];科技日报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 高中玉;腰椎对不同后部结构损伤后稳定性修复能力及机制的研究[D];天津医科大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李修璨;腰椎微创棘突间撑开系统的实验研究[D];中国人民解放军医学院;2017年
2 付林;不同棘突间撑开高度对融合椎上位椎间稳定性的生物力学作用研究[D];天津医科大学;2017年
3 付诚;腰椎经椎间孔入路椎间融合生物力学特性研究[D];上海交通大学;2015年
4 马风华;联合检测C反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率及降钙素原对腰椎术后早期感染诊断的临床意义[D];新疆医科大学;2015年
5 曹胜;腰椎Modic改变及分型与椎间盘IL-1β、COX-2表达的相关性研究[D];天津医科大学;2015年
6 王化瑾;单节段腰椎融合内固定术后发生邻椎病的危险因素分析[D];新疆医科大学;2016年
7 蔡刚峰;经皮套管腰椎椎旁入路解剖、影像学基础及微创治疗腰椎间盘突出症的研究[D];福建医科大学;2015年
8 温金焘;围手术期中医干预对腰椎融合术后胃肠功能恢复的影响研究[D];广州中医药大学;2016年
9 陆斌杰;中西医结合治疗腰椎融合术后脑脊液漏的临床疗效研究[D];南京中医药大学;2016年
10 齐颖钊;各种腰椎融合技术在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用与探讨[D];河北医科大学;2017年
,本文编号:2348814
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2348814.html