寰枢椎板间融合器的研制及有限元分析
[Abstract]:Objective: 1. To evaluate the feasibility of atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage. 2. Preliminary design of atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage. To establish a three dimensional finite element model of normal upper cervical vertebra and verify the validity of the model. 4. Based on the 3D finite element model of normal upper cervical vertebra, the finite element model of atlantoaxial instability was established by using finite element analysis. The finite element model of posterior atlantoaxial screw rod internal fixation and the finite element model of atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage combined with posterior screw rod internal fixation were used to analyze the mechanical characteristics of atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage. Methods: 1. Atlantoaxial CT images were performed in 100 normal adults, 50 males and 50 females aged 1876 years. Using PACS system workstation to read images and measure related data. 2. The Atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage was designed with Solidworks 2012 software. Volunteers were selected to exclude upper cervical spine diseases and CT images were obtained by scanning. The 3D finite element model of normal upper cervical vertebra was constructed by using Mimics 13.0 Geomagic Studio 2012Abaqus 6.14 software. The validity of the model is verified by comparing with previous literature data by ROM. 4. 4. Based on the three dimensional finite element model of normal upper cervical spine, the finite element model of atlantoaxial instability, the finite element model of posterior atlantoaxial screw and rod fixation and the finite element model of atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage combined with posterior screw rod fixation were established. Finite element analysis is used to calculate the activity and stress of various models under different working conditions. Results: 1. There was no significant difference in bilateral data (P0.05). After combining bilateral data, there were significant differences between the two genders (P0.05), but there was no significant difference in H2P1L (P0.05). The male and female L1 were 23.41 mm, and 22.23 mm H1 were 6.00mm and 5.28 mm L _ 2, 18.54mm and 17.31 mm H _ 2 were 5.12mm and 4.98 mm 路L ~ (-1), 32.63 and 31.39 mm 路2, respectively. The atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage was preliminarily designed. A three-dimensional finite element model of normal upper cervical vertebrae was established, consisting of 206745 elements and 72496 nodes. The finite element model of atlantoaxial instability, the finite element model of posterior atlantoaxial screw and rod fixation and the finite element model of atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage combined with posterior screw rod were established. Under the six working conditions of forward flexion, extension, left flexion, right flexion, left rotation and right rotation, the activity of the two fixed models was much smaller than that of the normal model and the unstable model (P0.05). The activity of the instability model was much higher than that of the normal model (P0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two fixed models (P0.05). The stress cloud images under six conditions showed that the maximum stress of atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion was concentrated on the bone site of microtitanium nail implantation. In the two fixed models, the maximum stress of nail-rod was concentrated on the root of screw and the connecting rod, but there was no significant difference between the maximum equal effect force (P0.05). Conclusion: 1. Atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage is theoretically feasible. 2. The 3 D finite element model of normal upper cervical vertebra is effective and can be studied. Atlantoaxial interlaminar fusion cage is stable and safe, and has no significant effect on the fixation and force of posterior screw rod.
【学位授予单位】:南方医科大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R687.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邹小宝;马向阳;杨进城;夏虹;尹庆水;吴增晖;陈树金;杨敏;;经口咽前路减压侧块关节融合器植骨融合联合颈椎压力固定器治疗难复性寰枢椎脱位[J];中国脊柱脊髓杂志;2016年11期
2 陈金水;林松庆;徐皓;倪斌;郭群峰;王本海;张慧浩;郑明声;;两种寰枢椎后路内固定系统的三维有限元分析[J];中国矫形外科杂志;2016年13期
3 马向阳;杨进城;邱锋;尹庆水;夏虹;吴增晖;王建华;艾福志;章凯;麦小红;;寰枢椎脱位后路植骨材料的选择与融合效果评价[J];中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志;2015年01期
4 张皓南;尹庆水;刘桂英;杨涛;黄文华;;经口前路寰枢椎侧块关节融合器的力学稳定性评价[J];中国临床解剖学杂志;2014年03期
5 廖文胜;刘玉峰;鲍恒;王利民;;经口前路寰枢椎侧块关节间固定融合器的研制及生物力学分析[J];郑州大学学报(医学版);2013年05期
6 李胜华;汪康;夏良政;徐宏光;吴连仲;;后路寰枢椎侧块关节融合器置入的临床应用解剖[J];中国骨与关节损伤杂志;2012年05期
7 马向阳;尹庆水;吴增晖;夏虹;章凯;王建华;艾福志;杨进城;麦小红;刘景发;;多种寰枢椎后路钉棒固定技术的临床组合应用[J];中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志;2010年01期
8 钟世镇;;从数字人到数字医学[J];医学研究杂志;2009年08期
9 张绍祥;;数字化人体与数字医学的研究概况及发展趋势[J];第三军医大学学报;2009年01期
10 肖进;尹庆水;张美超;赵卫东;马向阳;李鉴轶;;垂直载荷作用下骨盆的三维有限元分析[J];中国组织工程研究与临床康复;2008年39期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 张晟;五种内固定方式用于不同Pauwels分型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[D];南方医科大学;2013年
2 李松凯;寰枢椎侧块关节融合器的研制及力学研究[D];第二军医大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 张皓南;经口前路寰枢椎侧块关节融合器的研制及实验研究[D];南方医科大学;2014年
2 朱昌荣;锁骨骨折不同固定方式生物力学特性的有限元分析[D];南方医科大学;2013年
3 任俊涛;枢椎前路解剖型钢板的研制及有限元分析[D];南昌大学;2012年
4 刘玉峰;颅颈交界畸形影像学测量及侧块关节固定融合装置的研制[D];郑州大学;2010年
5 李松凯;寰枢椎椎间关节融合器研制的解剖学及生物力学研究[D];第二军医大学;2008年
,本文编号:2361398
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2361398.html