当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 外科论文 >

普瑞巴林联合塞来昔布治疗腰椎间盘突出症经皮内镜术后神经病理性疼痛的疗效观察

发布时间:2019-03-01 18:32
【摘要】:目的探讨普瑞巴林联合塞来昔布治疗腰椎间盘突出症经皮内镜术后神经病理性疼痛的疗效。方法2014年1月—6月采用经皮内镜椎板间入路腰椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗178例腰椎间盘突出症患者,其中90例符合选择标准纳入研究,并按照性别、病程、病变节段、吸烟史以及术前Leeds神经病理性症状和体征评分(LANSS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分,等配比分成A、B、C组(n=30);试验期间9例患者因未完成研究或失访剔除研究。每组各27例纳入最终分析。3组患者性别、年龄、身高、体质量指数、病变节段、病程、吸烟史以及术前LANSS评分、ODI评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、手术时间等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),具有可比性。3组患者均从术前3 d至术后14 d口服塞来昔布;A组术前3 d开始加用普瑞巴林至术后14 d,B组术后14 d内加用普瑞巴林。服药期间观察患者药物不良反应发生情况。术前及术后1 d、1个月、3个月行静息及活动状态下VAS评分以及LANSS评分;术前及术后1、3个月行ODI评分;术后3个月记录发生神经病理性疼痛例数,采用改良Macnab标准评价临床疗效。结果试验期间,在增加普瑞巴林剂量时A组1例出现严重头晕,B组1例出现嗜睡,均停药并剔除研究;另有2例(A组1例、C组1例)出现口干,B组1例出现乏力,对症处理后症状缓解。术后1 d,A组LANSS评分、静息及活动状态下VAS评分均低于B、C组(P0.05);术后1个月,A、B组LANSS评分、ODI评分、静息及活动状态下VAS评分均低于C组(P0.05);术后3个月,A、B组LANSS评分、ODI评分及活动状态下VAS评分均低于C组(P0.05);其余各时间点以上指标组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。术后3个月,7例患者发生神经病理性疼痛,其中A组1例(3.7%)、C组6例(22.2%),A、B组与C组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),A、B组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。按照改良Macnab评价标准,A、B、C组优良率分别为92.6%、88.9%、85.2%,3组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论腰椎间盘突出症经皮内镜术围手术期口服普瑞巴林联合塞来昔布能减轻患者术后疼痛程度,降低神经病理性疼痛发生率。术前口服普瑞巴林能减少术后急性神经病理性疼痛的发生。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the therapeutic effect of prapamil combined with celecoxib in the treatment of neuropathic pain after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar disc herniation (LIDP). Methods from January to June, 2014, 178 patients with lumbar disc herniation were treated by percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy, 90 of which were included in the study according to sex, course of disease and segment of lesion, and 90 of them were included in the study according to sex, course of disease and pathological segment. Smoking history and preoperative Leeds neuropathic symptoms and signs score (LANSS), Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) score, equal score was A, B, C group (n = 30); During the trial, 9 patients were excluded because of incomplete study or missed follow-up. Gender, age, height, body mass index, lesion segment, course of disease, smoking history and preoperative LANSS score, ODI score and pain visual analogue score (VAS),) were included in the final analysis of 27 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in operation time and other general data (P0.05). Three groups of patients were taken celecoxib orally from 3 days before operation to 14 days after operation, and all the three groups were treated with celecoxib orally from 3 days before operation to 14 days after operation. The patients in group A received prednisine from 3 days before operation to 14 days after operation, and those in group B received prednisone within 14 days after operation. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was observed during the medication period. Before and 1 day, 1 month and 3 months after operation, VAS score and LANSS score were performed at rest and activity, ODI score was performed before operation and 1 month and 3 months after operation. Cases of neuropathic pain were recorded 3 months after operation, and the clinical efficacy was evaluated by modified Macnab criteria. Results during the experiment, one case in group A developed severe dizziness and one case in group B developed somnolence when the dosage of primadipine was increased. All patients were stopped and removed from the study. The other 2 cases (1 case in group A and 1 case in group C) developed dry mouth and 1 case in group B showed fatigue. The symptoms were relieved after treatment. On the 1st day after operation, the LANSS score, VAS score at rest and activity in group A were lower than those in group B, group C (P0.05), and the scores of LANSS, ODI, VAS at rest and activity in group A and B were lower than those in group C at the first month after operation (P0.05). At 3 months after operation, the LANSS score, ODI score and VAS score in group A and B were lower than those in group C (P0.05), but there was no significant difference in the other indexes above each time point (P0.05). Three months after operation, 7 patients developed neuropathic pain, including 1 case in group A (3.7%), C), 6 cases (22.2%) in group A, and there was significant difference between group A and group C (P0.05), A,). There was no significant difference between groups B (P0.05). According to the improved Macnab criteria, the excellent and good rates of A, B and C groups were 92.6%, 88.9% and 85.2%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups (P0.05). Conclusion Peri-operative oral prednisone combined with celecoxib can relieve postoperative pain and reduce the incidence of neuropathic pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Oral prednisone before operation can reduce the incidence of postoperative acute neuropathic pain.
【作者单位】: 四川大学华西医院骨科;广西壮族自治区人民医院骨科;
【分类号】:R687.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 曲彩红;雷姿颖;朱建芸;;普瑞巴林致中枢神经系统损害及血小板减少1例[J];中国医院药学杂志;2012年01期

2 陈伟康;吴明东;;普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛30例[J];海峡药学;2012年09期

3 陈敖,张建军;普瑞巴林的合成[J];中国医药工业杂志;2004年04期

4 赵立波;谢代鑫;沈鼎烈;;抗癫沲新药普瑞巴林[J];临床神经电生理学杂志;2008年03期

5 李杰;燕玮;王晓天;;普瑞巴林在带状疱疹后神经痛中的应用[J];实用药物与临床;2011年04期

6 顾丽丽;张学学;张达颖;;普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床观察[J];中国新药杂志;2012年16期

7 虞培敏;朱国行;丁玎;徐岚;周东;吴立文;廖卫平;迟兆富;朱遂强;杨期明;陈阳美;郑荣远;董万利;狄晴;李继梅;胡兴越;丁成峗;黄远桂;洪震;;多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照评价普瑞巴林添加治疗部分性癫沲发作的疗效和安全性[J];中国临床神经科学;2014年01期

8 熊东林;杨娟;罗裕辉;梁豪文;廖翔;张德仁;;普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床观察[J];中国医学工程;2011年07期

9 文怀昌;赵家贵;赵丽;朱本藩;程先青;陈家骅;;普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床疗效观察[J];安徽医药;2012年08期

10 王文娟;赵梓纲;李恒进;;电针联合普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的疗效观察[J];中华保健医学杂志;2013年02期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 胡艳鹏;余鹏;郭歆;程航;资莹;冉黎灵;谷振坤;吴蔚;张兴艳;程泽能;;普瑞巴林胶囊药物动力学研究[A];第九届全国药物和化学异物代谢学术会议论文集[C];2009年

2 杜冬萍;;神经病理性疼痛治疗进展:普瑞巴林(Pregabalin)[A];第三届浙江省疼痛学术研讨会资料汇编[C];2010年

3 唐惠林;易湛苗;陈子琦;翟所迪;;普瑞巴林治疗中枢性神经痛的Meta分析[A];2011年中国药学大会暨第11届中国药师周论文集[C];2011年

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 朱园园 译;普瑞巴林可显著缓解外伤后周围神经痛[N];中国医药报;2009年

2 许关煜 李敏华;普瑞巴林仿制受阻[N];医药经济报;2012年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 梁立双;普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹神经痛及预防带状疱疹后神经痛的临床研究[D];山东大学;2015年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 刘春霞;普瑞巴林的合成工艺研究[D];郑州大学;2015年

2 颜峰峰;普瑞巴林合成工艺研究[D];浙江大学;2014年

3 尹君;普瑞巴林治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的疗效:随机对照试验的Meta分析[D];浙江大学;2016年

4 张道林;普瑞巴林结构确证及质量研究[D];重庆大学;2008年

5 黄燕;普瑞巴林的合成工艺研究[D];浙江大学;2008年

6 吴薇;微生物转化法制备普瑞巴林手性中间体[D];浙江大学;2011年

7 孙学佳;普瑞巴林的合成工艺与研究[D];华东师范大学;2013年

8 徐U,

本文编号:2432691


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2432691.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户dbbbd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com