屈光参差性弱视治疗后期加入视功能训练的临床观察

发布时间：2018-09-09 08:33

【摘要】：目的:观察视功能训练对屈光参差性弱视治疗后期弱视眼视功能恢复的作用。方法:试验组23例23眼患儿在配镜及定量遮盖的基础上弱视眼进行脱抑制、单眼调节训练、双眼调节集合训练、双眼融像训练、双眼扫视训练、双眼运动融像训练等,对照组20例23眼患儿在配镜及定量遮盖的基础上只进行光刷、红闪、光栅、精目训练等弱视训练。结果:立体视、AMP、AF、NRA、PRA、NPC试验组与对照组组间治疗前对比分析无统计学差异(P0.05);立体视、AMP、AF、PRA、NPC试验组与对照组组间治疗后对比分析有统计学差异(P0.05);NRA试验组与对照组组间治疗后对比无统计学差异(P0.05);立体视、AMP、AF、NRA、PRA、NPC试验组与对照组对比治疗前无统计学差异(P0.05);立体视、AMP、AF、NRA、PRA、NPC试验组与对照组对比治疗后有统计学差异(P0.05),通过数据对比可以看出试验组数据明显优于对照组。结论:在弱视治疗后期加入视功能训练与传统弱视治疗对比,加入视功能训练双眼立体视、AMP、AF、PRA、NPC等各项视功能数据明显优于传统弱视治疗,NRA与传统弱视治疗无差异。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the effect of visual function training on the recovery of amblyopia in anisometropic amblyopia. Methods: 23 cases (23 eyes) of children with amblyopia were treated with depressive, monocular adjustment, binocular fusion, binocular myopia and binocular motor fusion on the basis of mirror matching and quantitative covering. In the control group, 23 eyes of 20 cases were treated with light brush, red flash, grating, eye training and other amblyopia training on the basis of mirror matching and quantitative covering. Results: there was no statistical difference between the experimental group and control group before treatment (P0.05), and there was significant difference after treatment between the experimental group and control group (P0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P0.05); there was no statistical difference between the two groups before and after treatment (P0.05); there was statistical difference between the two groups after treatment (P0.05). The data of the experimental group was obviously better than that of the control group (P0.05). Conclusion: there is no difference between traditional amblyopia treatment and traditional amblyopia treatment in the later stage of amblyopia treatment.
【作者单位】：广西中医药大学附属瑞康医院视光中心;
【分类号】：R777.44

【相似文献】