Frank征与心血管疾病的相关性研究
[Abstract]:BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Frank's sign, also known as the earlobe crease sign, is a common body surface marker in the population. Prior foreign epidemiological studies have found that there is a marked increase in the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the case of Frank's positive people, suggesting that Frank's sign may be a clue to the early detection of cardiovascular disease. However, it is not clear whether there is a racial difference in this feature, especially whether Frank's sign and cardiovascular disease are still lacking in the Chinese Han population. The purpose of this study is to study the correlation between Frank's sign and cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes) in Chinese Han population by collecting the clinical data and the characteristics of Frank's sign in the patients in the heart of the People's Hospital of Shaanxi Province. in order to provide a simple clinical clue for the early diagnosis of the cardiovascular disease. Methods: In the period from January 2016 to December 2016, 2000 patients (1097 men and 64 years of age) of the Department of Cardiology of the People's Hospital of Shaanxi Province were included, and the medical history and the biochemical examination data were recorded in detail. The Frank sign-negative group, where the positive standard is the double side or one-sided earlobe fold length is greater than 1/ 3 of the total ear lobe. The difference between Frank's positive group and Frank's negative group (hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, smoking history, history of drinking, history of kidney disease, sex) was compared by the card-side test, respectively. T-test was used to analyze the difference between Frank's positive group and Frank's negative group (low density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglyceride and uric acid). Results: 1. The incidence of positive group of positive group was 54. 6%. The incidence of male in positive group was higher than that of the negative group of Frank (55.9% vs. 48. 8%), and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.001). The mean age of Frank's positive group was significantly higher than that of Frank's negative group (59. 29, 11.92). The difference was significant (P 0.001). The incidence of coronary heart disease in the positive group of Frank was significantly higher than that of the negative group of Frank (61.4% vs. 51.3%), and the difference was significant (P 0.001). The incidence of hypertension in the positive group of Frank's positive group was significantly higher than that of the negative group of Frank (62.3% vs. 54.1%), and the difference was significant (P 0.001), and the incidence of diabetes in the positive group of Frank's positive group was higher than that of the negative group of Frank (28. 6% vs. 21.1%). There was no statistical difference (P = 0.531) between the incidence of renal disease and the incidence of renal disease in the negative group of the Frank sign (P = 0. 531), and there was no statistical difference between the positive group of the positive group and the negative group of the Frank sign (P = 0.140). There was no statistical difference (4.6% vs. 4.8%) between the positive group and the negative group of Frank (P = 0.779). The mean value of triglyceride (1.48% 0.94) in the positive group was significantly lower than that of the negative group in the negative group (1.60% and 1.00), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.031). There was no statistical difference (P = 0.183) between the mean of low-density lipoprotein (2.50-0.82) and the average of low-density lipoprotein (2.32-0.96) in the negative group of Frank-positive group. The mean value of high-density lipoprotein (1.53-13.21) in the positive group and the mean value of high-density lipoprotein (1.14-0.34) in the negative group of the Frank-positive group were not statistically different (P = 0.163), and the average of uric acid (32.9. 31-116. 34) in the positive group of the Frank-positive group was significantly higher than the average of uric acid in the negative group of Frank (33.2. 13-100. 92). The difference was significant (P = 0. 006). There was a significant correlation between Frank's sign and age, sex, diabetes, hypertension and coronary heart disease (P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0. 035, P = 0. 024, P = 0. 008). Conclusion: 1. In the patients with cardiovascular and related diseases, the positive rate of Frank's sign is high, it can reach 54. 6%, and there is a gender difference. 2. Frank's sign can be used as an early identification clue for cardiovascular diseases and related diseases.
【学位授予单位】:西安医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:R54;R764
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭瑞;王增武;;我国常见心血管疾病的流行现状及人群干预效果[J];中华心血管病杂志;2014年04期
2 郑玉云;张春菊;张慧恩;;女性冠心病患者耳折与冠状动脉病变的相关性研究[J];中国介入心脏病学杂志;2011年03期
3 金明磊;赵晓玲;赵丽英;田进文;;冠状动脉造影结果与耳垂皱纹相关性临床研究[J];河北医学;2010年06期
4 丁进;宫剑滨;;耳垂皱褶与冠心病的相关性研究[J];现代中西医结合杂志;2009年29期
5 王宏;王永志;高云翔;;Ⅱ型糖尿病患者心血管疾病危险因素研究进展[J];中国误诊学杂志;2006年06期
6 陈雅萍;俞敏;何青芳;钟节鸣;王立新;胡如英;龚巍巍;;肥胖症与慢性病及其聚集关系的研究[J];中国预防医学杂志;2005年05期
7 张安玉,孔灵芝;慢性病的流行形势和防治对策[J];中国慢性病预防与控制;2005年01期
8 李莹,陈志红,周北凡,李义和,武阳丰,刘小清,赵连成,麦劲壮,杨军,石美玲,田秀珍,关渭全,于学海,陈磊;血脂和脂蛋白水平对我国中年人群缺血性心血管病事件的预测作用[J];中华心血管病杂志;2004年07期
9 欧家满,李京波;耳垂皱纹与冠心病的临床相关性研究[J];中西医结合心脑血管病杂志;2003年10期
10 顾东风 ,黄广勇 ,吴锡桂 ,段秀芳 ,何江 ,Paul K Whelton ,Stephen Mac Mahon;中国心力衰竭流行病学调查及其患病率[J];中华心血管病杂志;2003年01期
,本文编号:2365967
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/wuguanyixuelunwen/2365967.html