中美执业药师制度比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-06 01:05

本文选题：执业药师　切入点：法律地位　出处：《中国药房》2017年16期

【摘要】：目的:比较我国与美国执业药师制度,为提高我国药学服务质量和促进公众用药安全提供参考。方法:检索中国知网和万方数据库中近10年的相关研究文献,比较美国和我国执业药师在法律地位、准入资格、法律义务和责任方面的不同,提出完善我国执业药师制度的建议。结果与结论:当前我国执业药师制度存在的问题主要是法律地位不高、准入门槛较低、法律义务和责任不明确;而美国执业药师制度经过上百年的发展,形成了较为严密的法律体系,美国药房理事会颁布《标准州药房法》对执业药师的准入资格、法律义务和责任进行了明确详尽的规定,各州药房法以此为蓝本制定。鉴于我国当前国情,有必要借鉴美国的上述经验,对我国执业药师的法律地位、准入资格、法律义务和责任予以完善,以提升我国药学服务质量。
[Abstract]:Objective: To compare the Chinese and American licensed pharmacist system, to provide reference for improving the quality of pharmaceutical service in our country and promote the safe use of drugs. Methods: to search the related literature in recent 10 years Chinese CNKI and Wanfang database, comparison of licensed pharmacists in China and the United States in the legal status, the qualification of legal obligations and responsibilities different, put forward to perfect our licensed pharmacist system. Results and conclusion: the presence of licensed pharmacist in China is the main problem of the current system of legal status is not high, low entry barriers, legal obligations and responsibilities are not clear; and the United States licensed pharmacist system after hundreds of years of development, has formed a strict legal system the United States, the pharmacy Council promulgated < standard state pharmacy law > qualification for practicing pharmacists, legal obligations and responsibilities are clear and detailed provisions, pharmacy law of the state as a blueprint for our country in view. It is necessary for us to learn from the above experience of the United States to improve the legal status, qualification, legal obligations and responsibilities of licensed pharmacists in China, so as to improve the quality of pharmaceutical care in China.

【作者单位】：首都医科大学卫生管理与教育学院;中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(No.13YJCZH269) 北京市社会科学基金资助项目(No.13FXC041) 首都卫生管理与政策研究基地开放性课题(No.2016JD05)
【分类号】：R95

【相似文献】