对《中国药典》“炮制通则”部分问题的分析与建议

发布时间：2018-07-13 12:38

【摘要】：目的:为再版《中国药典》中"炮制通则"涉及炮制方法的名称和定义的规范化提供参考。方法:对比《中药炮制学》《北京市中药饮片炮制规范》《神农本草经》《全国中药材炮制规范》等书籍,对2015年版《中国药典》(四部)"炮制通则"中部分炮制方法的名称和定义问题进行分析,并提出建议。结果:《中国药典》"炮制通则"部分项目定义有待规范,可操作性有待提高。如炙法及其项下酒炙、醋炙、盐炙、蜜炙定义不准确;蒸法定义不准确;饮片项下的炮制方法名称不统一;制霜法定义涵盖范围有偏差;辅料用量比例共性意义不大等。结论:《中国药典》以"通则"的形式概括和定义所有中药饮片的炮制方法,应兼顾通用性、准确性、宽泛性。
[Abstract]:Objective: to provide a reference for the standardization of the names and definitions of the processing methods in the reprint of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Methods: to compare and compare the Chinese herbal medicine processing standard of Beijing, Shennong Herbal Herbal Classic, the National Chinese Medicinal Materials processing Standard, and so on. This paper analyzes the names and definitions of some processing methods in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (four parts) of 2015 edition, and puts forward some suggestions. Results: the definition of some items in Chinese Pharmacopoeia (General principles of processing) needs to be standardized, and the maneuverability needs to be improved. For example, the definition of broiling, vinegar, salt and honey is not accurate; the definition of steaming is not accurate; the name of the processing method is not uniform; the definition of frost making has deviation; the proportion of the amount of excipients is not of common significance, and so on. Conclusion: the Chinese Pharmacopoeia generalizes and defines the processing methods of all traditional Chinese medicine pieces in the form of "General rules", which should take into account the generality, accuracy and generality.
【作者单位】：北京中医药大学中医学院;首都医科大学附属北京中医医院临床药学科;
【基金】：国家中医药管理局中医药信息标准研究与制定项目(No.SATCM-2015-XXBZ[048])
【分类号】：R921.2

【相似文献】