我院1297个品规药品电子识别码的调研和启示
发布时间:2018-09-01 12:19
【摘要】:目的:为政府部门制订药品赋码政策提供数据支持,保证用药安全。方法:调研我院现有的1 297个品规的药品最小外包装上条形码、电子监管码的赋码情况,分别按药品制造商类型(进口、进口分装、国产)和处方类型(处方药与非处方药)进行调研、分类与分析。结果:我院现有药品中有条形码、有电子监管码、两码兼有以及两码均无的药品分别占总品规的50.27%、37.24%、20.28%和32.77%;进口药品中上述情况分别占23.21%、4.29%、0.71%、73.21%,进口分装类药品中则分别为30.22%、44.60%、12.95%、38.13%,国产药品为62.07%、46.58%、27.68%、19.02%;处方药中上述情况分别占44.39%、36.95%、18.21%和36.87%,非处方药中则分别为93.55%、39.35%、35.48%和2.58%。结论:在调查的药品中,条形码较电子监管码赋码率相对更高,非处方药较处方药赋码率更高。建议加快赋码速度、统一赋码标准,以利于实现药品的科学化管理,确保患者安全用药。
[Abstract]:Objective: to provide data support for government departments to formulate drug coding policy to ensure drug safety. Methods: to investigate the barcode and electronic regulatory code on the minimum outer package of 1 297 products in our hospital, and divide them according to the type of drug manufacturer (import and import). Domestic) and prescription types (prescription and OTC) were investigated, classified and analyzed. Results: there were bar codes and electronic regulatory codes in the existing drugs in our hospital. The number of drugs in both yards and without them accounted for 50.27.2% and 32.77% of the total specifications, respectively; the proportion of imported drugs was 23.2121 and 4.294.294.290.771.The number was 30.222.6012.958.13. the number of domestic drugs was 62.0776.587.6819.022.The proportion of prescription drugs was 44.3936.9518.21% and 36.87g respectively. The proportion of non-prescriptions was 36.9518.21% and 36.87g respectively. The proportion of domestic drugs was 62.07 and 27.6819.02.The proportion of prescriptions was 44.3936.9518.21% and 36.87g respectively. In prescription drugs 93.55% and 2.58%, respectively. Conclusion: among the drugs investigated, the rate of barcode is higher than that of electronic regulatory code, and the rate of over-the-counter drugs is higher than that of prescription drugs. It is suggested to speed up the coding speed and unify the coding standard in order to realize the scientific management of drugs and ensure the safe use of drugs for patients.
【作者单位】: 中国医学科学院/北京协和医学院北京协和医院药剂科;北京中医药大学东直门医院东区药剂科;
【基金】:北京市2013-2014年度国家临床重点专科建设项目——信息化药品管理体系建设
【分类号】:R95
[Abstract]:Objective: to provide data support for government departments to formulate drug coding policy to ensure drug safety. Methods: to investigate the barcode and electronic regulatory code on the minimum outer package of 1 297 products in our hospital, and divide them according to the type of drug manufacturer (import and import). Domestic) and prescription types (prescription and OTC) were investigated, classified and analyzed. Results: there were bar codes and electronic regulatory codes in the existing drugs in our hospital. The number of drugs in both yards and without them accounted for 50.27.2% and 32.77% of the total specifications, respectively; the proportion of imported drugs was 23.2121 and 4.294.294.290.771.The number was 30.222.6012.958.13. the number of domestic drugs was 62.0776.587.6819.022.The proportion of prescription drugs was 44.3936.9518.21% and 36.87g respectively. The proportion of non-prescriptions was 36.9518.21% and 36.87g respectively. The proportion of domestic drugs was 62.07 and 27.6819.02.The proportion of prescriptions was 44.3936.9518.21% and 36.87g respectively. In prescription drugs 93.55% and 2.58%, respectively. Conclusion: among the drugs investigated, the rate of barcode is higher than that of electronic regulatory code, and the rate of over-the-counter drugs is higher than that of prescription drugs. It is suggested to speed up the coding speed and unify the coding standard in order to realize the scientific management of drugs and ensure the safe use of drugs for patients.
【作者单位】: 中国医学科学院/北京协和医学院北京协和医院药剂科;北京中医药大学东直门医院东区药剂科;
【基金】:北京市2013-2014年度国家临床重点专科建设项目——信息化药品管理体系建设
【分类号】:R95
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 郑敏霞;;中成药编码研究[J];海峡药学;2011年05期
2 徐s,
本文编号:2217184
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yiyaoxuelunwen/2217184.html
最近更新
教材专著