血清miR-122作为药物肝损伤生物标志物的敏感性和特异性比较
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the sensitivity and specificity of serum microRNA-122 (miR-122) as a biomarker of liver injury and to provide evidence for the evaluation of liver toxicity by miR-122. Methods APAP,1250 mg kg~ (-1), ig), 伪 -naphthaleneisothiocyanate) (ANIT,150 mg kg~ (-1), ig), methionine choline deficiency) diet (MCDD,) was used. Rat liver cell injury model, cholestasis model, fatty liver model and hepatic fibrosis model were established by free ingestion) and carbon tetrachloride (CCI_4,50%,ip), respectively. To evaluate the sensitivity of miR-122 as a biomarker for liver injury. Myocardial injury model and renal injury model were established by IH,2.5 mg kg~ (-1), iv) and GM,80 mg kg~ (-1), im), respectively. To evaluate the specificity of miR-122 as a biomarker of drug liver injury, serum and liver tissues were collected from rats at different time points. The activities of serum alanine aminotransferase (GPT), glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (GOT) and total bilirubin (TBIL) were detected by automatic biochemical instrument. The serum miR-122, was detected by real-time quantitative PCR and the liver tissue was examined by HE staining. Results compared with the control group, the time of serum miR-122 in hepatocyte injury model, cholestasis model, fatty liver model and hepatic fibrosis group was 2 times higher than that in the control group. Both of them were earlier than the traditional biomarkers GPT,GOT and TBIL [no significant increase (2 times) was found at 6 h after administration at 3 and 6 weeks]. At the same time, the range of increase (the maximum rise times were 235.8202.7 and 600.3 times respectively) was also higher than that of the traditional biomarkers GPT,GOT and TBIL (GPT, which were 9.5U 3.9U 2.5 and 6.6 times, respectively. In myocardial injury model, the activity of GOT increased significantly (2.1fold), but the serum miR-122 did not change significantly. There was no significant change in serum miR-122 in renal injury model. Conclusion Serum mi R-122 can be used as biomarker of liver injury, and it is more sensitive and specific than traditional biomarkers such as GPT,GOT and TBIL.
【作者单位】: 西北工业大学生命学院;中国医药工业研究总院国家上海新药安全评价研究中心;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金(81273603) 上海市青年科技启明星计划(14QB1400400) 上海科委实验动物专项基金(14140900900)~~
【分类号】:R965
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王三虎,高星;铅的生物标志物研究[J];中国职业医学;2002年01期
2 刘英;;预测药物毒性的药物基因组生物标志物[J];国际药学研究杂志;2008年04期
3 周晓冰;汪巨峰;李波;;毒理基因组学在生物标志物研究中的应用[J];药物评价研究;2012年02期
4 朱聪;黄芝瑛;周晓冰;李波;;肾毒性生物标志物临床前研究及应用进展[J];中国新药杂志;2014年04期
5 聂志勇;刘勤;陈佳;林缨;吴弼东;谢剑炜;;芥子气体内生物标志物的检测及其代谢与分布研究进展[J];国际药学研究杂志;2011年06期
6 Ong CN;接触低浓度苯的生物标志物:现场评价[J];职业卫生与病伤;1996年04期
7 于敏;张双庆;李佐刚;;早期肾损伤生物标志物的研究进展及其在药物肾毒性早期预测中的应用[J];中国药学杂志;2013年04期
8 汤森路透;;临床试验进展:生物标志物助推临床开发决策[J];药学进展;2014年04期
9 曾年华,宁教中,周炯亮,杨爱初;苯的两种生物标志物现场应用价值的比较[J];卫生研究;1996年05期
10 范捷,杨育红,周庆峰;肉毒碱乳清酸盐对不同因素诱导的小鼠实验性肝损伤的保护作用[J];中国医院药学杂志;2004年12期
相关会议论文 前9条
1 申秀萍;贾长虹;;十二五“重大新药创制”毒性生物标志物与人源化动物模型关键技术课题简介[A];2013年(第三届)中国药物毒理学年会暨药物非临床安全性评价研究论坛论文摘要[C];2013年
2 申秀萍;贾长虹;;十二五“重大新药创制”毒性生物标志物与人源化动物模型关键技术课题简介[A];中国药理学与毒理学杂志(2013年6月第27卷第3期)[C];2013年
3 卜令丽;刘丽;沈连忠;李波;;肾脏毒性相关生物标志物研究(摘要)[A];2010年全国药物毒理学学术会议论文集[C];2010年
4 段小丽;魏复盛;Gorge H.Lambert;Junfeng(Jim) Zhang;杨洪彪;;持久性有毒物质暴露及健康效应的生物标志物——咖啡因呼吸试验(CBT)研究[A];中国毒理学会第四届全国学术会议论文(摘要)集[C];2005年
5 李妍;任进;;非甾体抗炎药肝损伤机制的初步研究[A];2007年全国药物毒理学会议论文集[C];2007年
6 汤纳平;王雁;马t,
本文编号:2394454
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yiyaoxuelunwen/2394454.html