四川省应对风险灾害社区抗逆力水平TOPSIS法分析

发布时间：2018-01-28 14:05

本文关键词： 社区抗逆力风险灾害 TOPSIS法　出处：《中国公共卫生》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的分析四川省城市、农村、城镇不同地区社区抗逆力水平及原因。方法采取分层随机抽样方法抽取四川省880名社区居民进行风险灾害社区抗逆力水平问卷调查,应用TOPSIS综合评价方法对各地区进行排序,并用独立样本t检验比较不同地区间社区抗逆力水平。结果社区总体抗逆力评分为(3.15±0.19)分;基于TOPSIS综合分析法结果显示,农村Ci值为1,大于城市(0.282)与城镇(0.084)地区;农村居民在个人与社区关系和居民亲密程度得分为(3.69±0.73)和(3.58±0.79)分,均高于城市居民的(3.20±0.87)和(3.11±0.92)分及城镇居民的(3.27±0.73)和(3.15±0.79)分,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);农村与城镇比较社区灾害管理能力、信息沟通能力高于城镇(P0.05)。结论要有针对性地提高社区居民的社区意识、社区参与度,提高社区灾害管理能力,增强社区资源拥有率,完善社区服务,提高应对风险灾害的社区抗逆力水平。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the urban and rural areas of Sichuan Province. Methods A total of 880 community residents in Sichuan Province were selected by stratified random sampling to investigate the level of resilience in communities at risk. The TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation method is used to sort the regions. The level of community resilience was compared with independent sample t-test. Results the total community resilience score was 3.15 卤0.19; The results of TOPSIS comprehensive analysis showed that the value of ci in rural areas was 1, larger than that in urban areas (0.282) and urban areas (0.084). The scores of personal and community relationship and intimate degree were 3.69 卤0.73 and 3.58 卤0.79 respectively. The scores were 3.20 卤0.87) and 3.11 卤0.92) in urban residents, 3.27 卤0.73) and 3.15 卤0.79 in urban residents. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). The ability of information communication in rural areas is higher than that in towns (P0.050.Conclusion it is necessary to improve community awareness and community participation. Improve the ability of community disaster management, enhance community resource ownership, improve community service, and improve the level of community resilience to risk disasters.
【作者单位】：哈尔滨医科大学;国民健康社会风险预警协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(71173064;71473065)
【分类号】：R129
【正文快照】： 随着各类风险灾害的频发,人们的生命健康安全以及财产安全均面临着巨大威胁[1],如何增强应对风险灾害的能力是当前风险管理的重要任务。近年来,社区抗逆力理论得到不断应用和发展[2],作为社会、政府、个人三者之间起纽带作用的社区,研究其抗逆力水平对提高基层抵御风险灾害的

【相似文献】