瑜伽运动对更年期妇女健康体能和症状困扰的影响

发布时间：2018-03-20 04:35

本文选题：瑜伽　切入点：社区　出处：《南华大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：目的：探讨瑜伽运动对社区更年期妇女健康体能和更年期症状困扰的影响，为社区更年期妇女开展健康促进活动提供参考依据。方法：在株洲市芦淞区两个街区随机招募符合条件的40～60岁之间的更年期妇女各40人作为研究对象，然后采用随机数字法分为试验组和对照组，试验组最终有效样本35人，对照组最终有效样本36人。试验组研究对象参加为期6个月的瑜伽运动，每次运动时间为50min，每周运动3次；对照组研究对象维持原来的生活方式不变；干预前进行基线调查，在干预3个月末和干预6个月末分别进行2次效果评价。效果评价指标分为一般健康指标（血压、心率、肺活量、体重、胸围、腰围、臀围及单足站立测验等）；健康体能指标（采用肌力与肌耐力、身体质量指数（BMI）及柔软度）；更年期症状困扰量表评价更年期症状困扰程度；SF-36量表评价生活质量效果。数据采用卡方检验、t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验及重复测量方差分析等统计方法进行分析。结果： 1.在干预3个月末和干预6个月末，除干预3个月末的收缩压外，两组研究对象的心率、血压、肺活量、体重、胸围、腰围、臀围及单脚站立时间等一般健康指标数值比较，差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）；除干预6个月末的胸围外，试验组研究对象的心率、血压、肺活量、体重、胸围、腰围、臀围及单脚站立时间等一般健康指标数值在不同时间点比较，差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）。 2.在干预3个月末和干预6个月末，除干预3个月末的肌耐力外，两组研究对象的健康体能各指标的数值比较，差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）；除干预6个月末的柔软度外，试验组研究对象健康体能各指标的数值在不同时间点比较，差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）。 3.在干预3个月末和干预6个月末，两组研究对象的更年期症状困扰总均分及各维度得分比较，差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）；除干预6个月末的心血管及自主神经症状和骨关节症状两个维度得分外，试验组研究对象的更年期症状困扰总均分及各维度得分在不同时间点比较，差异均有统计学意义（P0.05）。 4.在干预3个月和干预6个月末，除干预3个月末的身体健康状况总均分（PCS）和生理功能维度得分外，两组研究对象的身体健康状况各维度得分及总均分（PCS）和心理健康状况各维度得分及总均分（MCS）比较，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）；除干预6个月末的社会功能和心理健康两个维度得分外，试验组研究对象的身体健康状况各维度得分及总均分（PCS）和心理健康状况各维度得分及总均分（MCS）在不同时间点比较，，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论： 1.瑜伽运动能改善社区更年期妇女的一般健康状况。 2.瑜伽运动能提高社区更年期妇女的健康体能。 3.瑜伽运动能减轻社区更年期妇女的更年期症状困扰。 4.瑜伽运动能提高社区更年期妇女的生活质量。
[Abstract]:Objective:. To explore the influence of yoga exercise on health fitness and menopausal symptoms of community climacteric women, and to provide reference basis for community menopausal women to carry out health promotion activities. Methods:. In Zhuzhou City, 40 menopausal women aged between 40 and 60 years old were randomly recruited from two blocks of Zhuzhou Lusong District. Then they were divided into experimental group and control group by random number method. 35 effective samples were obtained in the experimental group. There were 36 effective samples in the control group. The subjects in the experimental group took part in a 6-month yoga exercise for 50 mins, 3 times a week, while the subjects in the control group maintained the same life style. The baseline survey was carried out before the intervention. The effects were evaluated twice at the end of 3 months of intervention and 6 months of intervention. The evaluation indexes were divided into general health indexes (blood pressure, heart rate, vital capacity, body weight, chest circumference, waist circumference). Hip circumference and one-legged standing test, fitness index (using muscle strength and muscle endurance, etc.). Body mass index (BMI) and softness; climacteric symptom disturbance scale (CPS) to evaluate the degree of menopausal symptom distress and SF-36 scale to evaluate quality of life (QOL). Chi-square test (chi-square test) and Wilcoxon rank sum test and repeated measurement ANOVA were used to evaluate the quality of life. Statistical method is used to analyze. Results:. 1. Heart rate, blood pressure, vital capacity, body weight, chest circumference, waist circumference, hip circumference and standing time of one foot were compared between the two groups. Except for the chest circumference at the end of 6 months, the heart rate, blood pressure, vital capacity, body weight, chest circumference, waist circumference, hip circumference and standing time of one foot were compared at different time points. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). 2. At the end of 3 months and 6 months of intervention, there were significant differences in the indexes of physical fitness between the two groups except for the muscular endurance at the end of 3 months, except for the softness of the two groups at the end of 6 months. In the study group, there were significant differences in the values of the indexes of physical fitness at different time points (P 0.05). 3. At the end of 3 months and 6 months of intervention, the mean scores of climacteric symptoms and the scores of each dimension were compared between the two groups. The differences were statistically significant (P 0.05), except for cardiovascular and autonomic symptoms and osteoarticular symptoms at the end of 6 months, the total mean scores of climacteric symptoms and the scores of each dimension were compared at different time points in the study group. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). 4. At the end of 3 months and 6 months of intervention, except for PCS and the dimension of physiological function, There were significant differences between the two groups in the scores of physical health and total mean scores (PCS), mental health scores and MCSs (P 0.05), except social function and mental health at the end of 6 months of intervention. The scores of physical health and total mean scores (PCS), mental health scores and total mean scores (MCSs) of the subjects in the study group were significantly different at different time points (P 0.05). Conclusion:. 1. Yoga can improve the general health of menopausal women in the community. 2. Yoga can improve the health and physical ability of climacteric women in the community. 3. Yoga exercise can relieve menopausal symptoms of community menopausal women. 4. Yoga can improve the quality of life of menopausal women in the community.
【学位授予单位】：南华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：R173

【参考文献】