青岛市市南区小学生营养干预效果评价

发布时间：2018-04-15 19:09

本文选题：营养状况 + 干预性研究　；参考：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：目的对小学生及家长进行强化干预和常规干预,比较强化干预和常规干预的干预效果,探讨强化干预措施的有效性和进一步推广的可行性。方法选取青岛市市南区4所小学3~5年级的学生及家长分为干预组和对照组:干预组学生697人,对照组学生731人;干预组家长1113人,对照组家长1234人,干预组进行“特制教学计划”“健康教育课程”和“大手拉小手”等有针对性的强化干预,对照组进行以“快乐10分钟”为主的常规干预,且在干预前后对调查学生及家长进行问卷调查,对小学生进行体格检查,评价营养干预效果,并运用SPSS19.0软件对资料采用χ~2检验和t检验进行统计学分析。结果小学生健康知识知晓率:通过1年的干预措施,干预组提高了19.09%,对照组提高了3.31%(P0.01)。小学生健康行为养成率:干预前干预组和对照组相差不大(P0.05),干预后干预组“经常吃新鲜蔬菜”、“经常吃新鲜水果”和“放学后及周末进行体育锻炼”明显高于对照组(P0.01);通过1年的干预措施,干预组“每天都吃早餐”、“经常吃新鲜蔬菜”、“经常吃新鲜水果”、“每天都喝奶”、“放学后及周末进行体育锻炼”均有明显提高(P0.01),对照组变化不大(P0.05)。小学生BMI的变化情况:通过1年的干预措施,干预组小学生BMI增长值为(0.60±1.56)kg/m~2,对照组为(1.06±1.51)kg/m~2(P0.01)。小学生营养状况:干预组和对照组改善均不明显(P0.05)。家长营养干预结果:干预后,干预组小学生家长营养知识知晓率有明显改善;小学生家长营养知识知晓率随着文化程度的增高而增高(P0.05);干预组小学生家长大部分健康行为养成率有所提高。结论通过1年的营养干预措施,相较于常规干预,有针对性的营养健康教育对提高小学生和家长的营养知识知晓率、健康行为养成率和预防营养性疾病的发生等方面更有优势。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the effect of intensive intervention and routine intervention on primary school students and their parents, and to explore the effectiveness and feasibility of intensive intervention.Methods the students and their parents were divided into two groups: intervention group (697 students), control group (731 students), intervention group (1113 parents) and control group (1234 parents).The intervention group received intensive intervention such as "special teaching plan" "health education course" and "big hand pulling small hand", while the control group received routine intervention with "happiness 10 minutes" as the main intervention.The students and parents were investigated by questionnaire before and after the intervention, the pupils were examined by physical examination, the effect of nutritional intervention was evaluated, and the data were analyzed statistically by 蠂 ~ 2 test and t test by SPSS19.0 software.Results the awareness rate of pupils' health knowledge: after one year's intervention, the intervention group increased 19.09% and the control group increased 3.31% P 0.01.The rate of health behavior formation of primary school students: there was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group before the intervention, but the intervention group "often ate fresh vegetables" after the intervention."eat fresh fruit" and "physical exercise after school and weekend" were significantly higher than those in control group (P 0.01). After one year's intervention, the intervention group "ate breakfast every day", "often ate fresh vegetables", "often ate fresh fruit", and "often ate fresh fruit"."drinking milk every day", "physical exercise after school and weekend" were significantly improved, the control group did not change P0.05.The change of BMI in primary school students: after one year's intervention, the increase value of BMI in the intervention group was 0.60 卤1.56 kg 路kg 路m ~ (-2) and that in the control group was 1.06 卤1.51 kg 路kg ~ (-2) 路kg ~ (-1) 路kg ~ (-1) 路kg ~ (-1) 路m ~ (-1).Nutritional status of primary school students: the intervention group and the control group were not significantly improved P0.05.Results of parental nutrition intervention: after intervention, the awareness rate of parents' nutrition knowledge in the intervention group was obviously improved;The awareness rate of parents' nutrition knowledge increased with the increase of education level, and the rate of healthy behavior formation of most parents in the intervention group increased.Conclusion compared with routine intervention, nutritional health education has more advantages in improving the awareness rate of nutrition knowledge, developing healthy behavior and preventing the occurrence of nutritional diseases in primary school students and parents after one year's nutrition intervention.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：R153.2

【参考文献】