在宫腔镜监护下行高危无痛人工流产术的应用分析

发布时间：2018-04-17 03:22

本文选题：宫腔镜 + 高危患者　；参考：《中外女性健康研究》2016年24期

【摘要】：目的:探讨宫腔镜监护下行高危无痛人工流产术的应用效果。方法:将我院2015年1月至12月收治的100例实施无痛人工流产术的高危患者随机分为两组,B超监护下常规无痛人流患者50例为对照组,宫腔镜监护下无痛人流患者50例为观察组。对比观察两组术中出血量、手术时间、术后阴道流血情况、月经恢复情况、手术并发症。结果:观察组的手术时间长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的术后阴道流血时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组月经恢复时间短于对照组,并发症少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:在宫腔镜监护下行高危人工流产手术克服了传统手术的盲目性,提高了手术效果,减少了手术并发症,值得临床推广及进一步研究。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the effect of high-risk painless artificial abortion under hysteroscopic monitoring.Methods: from January to December 2015, 100 patients with high risk of painless induced abortion were randomly divided into two groups: 50 patients with routine painless abortion under B ultrasonic monitoring as control group and 50 patients with painless abortion under hysteroscopy as observation group.The blood loss, operative time, vaginal bleeding, menstrual recovery and operative complications were compared between the two groups.Results: the operative time in the observation group was longer than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05).The time of postoperative vaginal bleeding in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group was less than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P 0.05).The menstrual recovery time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, and the complication was less than that in the control group (P 0.05).Conclusion: the high risk artificial abortion under hysteroscopy can overcome the blindness of the traditional operation, improve the operation effect and reduce the complications of the operation, so it is worthy of clinical popularization and further study.
【作者单位】：重庆市沙坪坝区妇幼保健计划生育服务中心妇科门诊;
【分类号】：R169.42

【相似文献】