某燃煤电厂脱硝系统职业病危害因素的调查与评价
本文选题:燃煤发电 + 脱硝工艺 ; 参考:《南华大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:目的: 通过对该燃煤电厂脱硝工艺系统中可能存在的职业病危害因素的调查,分析和明确该项目可能产生的职业病危害因素的种类和产生的主要环节;通过检测该项目中主要化学和物理性职业病危害因素的浓度或强度,并对该项目中存在的主要职业病危害因素进行评价,保障该项目为劳动者创造符合国家职业卫生标准和卫生要求的工作环境和条件,并采取措施保障劳动者获得职业卫生保护。 方法: 1.职业卫生学现场调查内容包括:该项目生产工艺过程,识别和确定生产中存在的职业病危害因素种类;核查作业场所职业病危害防护设施、应急救援设施、个人使用的职业病防护用品、职业病危害警示标识配置等措施的落实情况。 2.依据国家相关技术规范和标准的要求,在该项目运行正常情况下,对生产过程中产生的职业病危害因素进行现场检测和实验室分析,对该项目工作场所职业病危害因素的浓(强)度以及职业病危害防护设施的防护效果进行评定。 结果: 1.职业卫生现场调查结果表明,该电厂脱硝系统主要存在CO、CO_2、NO_x、SO_2、NH_3、炉灰尘、噪声及高温等职业病危害因素。 2.在该项目运行正常情况下,对工作地点空气中CO、CO_2、NO_x、SO_2、NH_3、炉灰尘现场采样检测结果表明,工作场所空气中CO、CO_2、NO_x、SO_2、NH_3、炉灰尘短时间接触浓度均符合国家职业卫生标准限值。在稀释风机工作地点噪声强度超过国家职业卫生标准,其他工作地点噪声强度符合国家职业卫生标准限值。 3.职业病防护措施方面,工作场所备有较完善的个人防护用品和应急救援措施。工作场所设置有职业安全警示标识,,但氨灌区等有毒气体处无警示宣传牌。 结论: 1.该电厂脱硝系统中主要存在CO、CO_2、NO_x、SO_2、NH_3、V_2O_5、炉灰尘、噪声及高温等职业病危害因素,其中NH_3、V_2O_5、粉尘和噪声是脱硝工艺的职业病危害关键控制点。 2.该项目采取了必要的职业病危害防护措施,对预防和控制职业病的发生具有一定的效果。
[Abstract]:Objective: Through the investigation of the possible occupational hazard factors in the denitrification process system of the coal-fired power plant, the types and main links of the occupational disease hazard factors that may be produced in the project are analyzed and clarified. By detecting the concentration or intensity of the main chemical and physical occupational hazards in the project, and evaluating the main occupational hazard factors in the project, To ensure that the project creates a working environment and conditions that meet the national occupational health standards and health requirements, and to take measures to ensure workers' access to occupational health protection. Methods: 1. The contents of the on-site investigation of occupational hygiene include: the production process of the project, the identification and determination of the types of occupational disease hazard factors existing in the production, the verification of the occupational disease hazard protection facilities in the workplace, and the emergency rescue facilities, Personal use of occupational disease protection equipment, occupational hazards warning signs and other measures to implement the situation. 2. In accordance with the requirements of the relevant national technical specifications and standards, under the normal operation of the project, the occupational hazard factors produced in the production process are detected on the spot and analyzed in the laboratory. The intensity (intensity) of occupational hazard factors and the protective effect of occupational hazards protection facilities in the workplace of the project were evaluated. Results: 1. The results of the occupational health field investigation show that the main hazard factors of the denitrification system in this power plant are COCOC _ (2) no _ (x) so _ (2) NH _ (3), furnace dust, noise and high temperature. 2. Under the normal operation of the project, the results of on-site sampling and detection of the COCOC _ 2NOX _ XO _ 2NH _ 3 in the air of the workplace show that the COCOCO2NOxso _ 2o _ 2 / NH _ 3 in the air of the workplace is in line with the national occupational health standard limit for the short time contact concentration of the furnace dust. The results show that the number of COCOO _ 2O _ x so _ 2 / NH _ 3 in the air of the workplace is in accordance with the national occupational health standard. The noise intensity of the dilute fan in the working place exceeds the national occupational health standard, and the noise intensity in other workplaces conforms to the national occupational health standard limit. 3. Occupational disease prevention measures, the workplace with more complete personal protective equipment and emergency rescue measures. Workplace has occupational safety warning signs, but ammonia irrigation areas and other toxic gases without warning signs. Conclusion: 1. In the denitrification system of the power plant, there are main hazard factors of occupational disease, such as COCO2CO2NOSXSO2C, NH3SO2S, NH3V2O5, furnace dust, noise and high temperature. Among them, NH3 / V2O5, dust and noise are the key control points of occupational disease hazard in denitrification process. 2. The project has taken necessary measures to prevent and control occupational diseases.
【学位授予单位】:南华大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:R13
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄伟;燃煤电厂NO_x污染及其控制技术[J];电力环境保护;2004年03期
2 杨冬;徐鸿;;SCR烟气脱硝技术及其在燃煤电厂的应用[J];电力环境保护;2007年01期
3 闫志勇;高翔;吴杰;姜烨;骆仲泱;倪明江;岑可法;;V_2O_5-WO_3-MoO_3/TiO_2催化剂制备及NH_3选择性还原NO_x的试验研究[J];动力工程;2007年02期
4 沈伯雄;王成东;郭宾彬;梁材;史展亮;;控制氮氧化物排放的低温SCR催化剂及工程应用[J];电站系统工程;2006年04期
5 郭婷婷;刘汉强;杨勇平;路光杰;;基于数值模拟的1000MW燃煤机组SCR脱硝系统设计[J];电站系统工程;2010年05期
6 王静;沈伯雄;刘亭;田晓娟;;钒钛基SCR催化剂中毒及再生研究进展[J];环境科学与技术;2010年09期
7 杨忠灿;文军;徐党旗;;燃煤锅炉的选择性催化还原烟气脱硝技术[J];广东电力;2006年02期
8 王守华;;某火力发电厂职业危害因素调查分析[J];中国公共卫生管理;2009年06期
9 梁斌,邱礼有,H.P.A.Calis,C.M.vandenBleek;Ce/β-分子筛催化剂上NH_3选择还原NO反应动力学研究[J];高校化学工程学报;1999年03期
10 叶代启,梁红;大气污染治理中的催化技术[J];工业催化;1999年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 ;[N];中国环境报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 兰泽全;煤和黑液水煤浆沾污结渣机理及灰沉积动态特性研究[D];浙江大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 李敏;氨选择性催化还原(SCR)氮氧化物的V_2O_5/TiO_2基催化剂活性及动力学研究[D];东南大学;2005年
本文编号:1833450
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yufangyixuelunwen/1833450.html