探讨超导可视与非可视无痛人工流产术的手术效果
发布时间：2019-01-05 02:02
【摘要】：目的：探讨全程超导可视无痛人工流产术与非可视下无痛人工流产术的手术效果有何异同。方法：选择2011年4～6月就诊于新疆医科大学第二附属医院妇产科自愿放弃妊娠行人工流产术的早孕妇女200例，随机分为全程超导可视无痛人工流产术组100例（观察组）和非可视下无痛人工流产术组100例（对照组）。通过观察两组术中出血量、手术时间、术后阴道流血时间、术后月经回复时间及术中术后并发症发生率（人工流产综合反应、漏吸、吸宫不全、宫腔宫颈粘连），比较两组的手术质量。结果：（1）观察组术中出血量（12.60±8.63）少于对照组（18.84±16.61），差异有统计学意义，P＜0.05；观察组手术使用时间（3.24±0.64）与对照组手术使用时间（3.35±0.83）差异无统计学意义，P＞0.05；观察组宫腔操作时间（1.36±0.34）少于对照组宫腔操作时间（1.55±0.40）差异有统计学意义，P＜0.05。（2）观察组与对照组术后阴道流血时间比较差异无统计学意义，P＞0.05。（3）观察组孕妇术后月经恢复时间短于对照组差异有统计学意义，P＜0.05。（4）观察组与对照组术中术后并发症比较差异无统计学意义，P＞0.05。结论：全程超导可视无痛人工流产术具有操作方便、手术中出血量少、宫腔内操作时间短、月经恢复快等优点，是一种安全的人工流产术方法，值得临床推广使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the differences and similarities of the operation effect between the whole course superconducting visual painless abortion and the non-visual painless abortion. Methods: from April to June 2011, 200 early pregnant women who had voluntarily given up pregnancy for artificial abortion were selected from the second affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Gynecology. They were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group (n = 100) and the control group (n = 100). The amount of intraoperative bleeding, the time of operation, the time of postoperative vaginal bleeding, the time of menstrual recovery after operation and the incidence of complications (synthetic reaction of induced abortion, leakage of aspiration, incomplete aspiration of uterus, cervical adhesions in uterine cavity) were observed in the two groups. The quality of operation was compared between the two groups. Results: (1) the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group (12.60 卤8.63) was significantly lower than that in the control group (18.84 卤16.61) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the operative time between the observation group (3.24 卤0.64) and the control group (3.35 卤0.83) (P > 0.05). The operating time of uterine cavity in the observation group (1.36 卤0.34) was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.55 卤0.40). P < 0.05. (2) there was no significant difference in postoperative vaginal bleeding time between the observation group and the control group, P > 0.05. (3) the menstrual recovery time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group. (4) there was no significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: superconducting visual painless abortion has the advantages of convenient operation, less bleeding, short intrauterine operation time and quick menstrual recovery. It is a safe method for artificial abortion and is worth popularizing in clinic.
【学位授予单位】：新疆医科大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：R169.42
本文编号：2401114
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the differences and similarities of the operation effect between the whole course superconducting visual painless abortion and the non-visual painless abortion. Methods: from April to June 2011, 200 early pregnant women who had voluntarily given up pregnancy for artificial abortion were selected from the second affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Gynecology. They were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group (n = 100) and the control group (n = 100). The amount of intraoperative bleeding, the time of operation, the time of postoperative vaginal bleeding, the time of menstrual recovery after operation and the incidence of complications (synthetic reaction of induced abortion, leakage of aspiration, incomplete aspiration of uterus, cervical adhesions in uterine cavity) were observed in the two groups. The quality of operation was compared between the two groups. Results: (1) the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group (12.60 卤8.63) was significantly lower than that in the control group (18.84 卤16.61) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the operative time between the observation group (3.24 卤0.64) and the control group (3.35 卤0.83) (P > 0.05). The operating time of uterine cavity in the observation group (1.36 卤0.34) was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.55 卤0.40). P < 0.05. (2) there was no significant difference in postoperative vaginal bleeding time between the observation group and the control group, P > 0.05. (3) the menstrual recovery time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group. (4) there was no significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05). Conclusion: superconducting visual painless abortion has the advantages of convenient operation, less bleeding, short intrauterine operation time and quick menstrual recovery. It is a safe method for artificial abortion and is worth popularizing in clinic.
【学位授予单位】：新疆医科大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：R169.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蔡汝萍;刘雪辉;;腹部B超监护下无痛人流术320例临床分析[J];当代医学;2009年24期
2 曾祥丽;;152例无痛人流后引起闭经的临床病因分析[J];中国医药导刊;2011年02期
3 陈妍;陈杨;谭进成;;全程超导可视无痛人流临床应用疗效观察[J];临床医学;2010年05期
4 牛鸿光,王卓然,尹文芹,果江娜,刘荣周,许连同,白树生,李兴久;人工流产吸引术时宫腔压力的研究[J];哈尔滨医药;1985年01期
5 张萍;;口服米非司酮过敏反应1例[J];淮海医药;2007年03期
6 孔喜莲;;循证护理在人工流产中的应用[J];护理实践与研究;2008年02期
7 胥建华;;160例流产及刮宫术后宫腔粘连原因分析[J];河南外科学杂志;2010年02期
8 陶桂娥;薛秀红;;宫腔镜联合超导可视诊治人工流产后异常出血患者的分析[J];医药论坛杂志;2010年14期
9 张东霞;邹燕;李凤岐;;药物流产的安全性分析[J];中国计划生育学杂志;2008年03期
10 李雅文;陶晓君;林佩萱;;可视人流机在高危宫腔手术中的临床应用[J];吉林医学;2010年22期
，本文编号：2401114
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yufangyixuelunwen/2401114.html
