《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-16 23:05

本文选题：人身伤害　切入点：人体损伤程度　出处：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》是鉴定人体损伤程度的法定标准,人体损伤程度鉴定意见对推动刑事诉讼程序的发展、认定人身伤害案件的法律事实和保障司法审判结果的公正具有重要意义。人体损伤鉴定标准是《刑法》及其他法律、法规的配套技术规范,是判断罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪、轻罪与重罪、附带民事赔偿与刑事和解的重要依据。《刑法》分则中涉及人体损伤的条款达到40处之多,《标准》的适用频率高、范围广。在刑事司法实践中,损伤程度鉴定意见在审判中的采纳率接近100%,法官过于依赖人体损伤程度鉴定意见。从中国裁判文书网上检索到涉及损伤程度鉴定的98711份判决书中,鉴定意见不予采纳的仅5份。笔者认为《标准》是具备司法解释性质的强制性标准,鉴定轻微伤、轻伤、重伤只此一个标准。学界对于人体损伤鉴定标准的法律地位仍有争议,没有形成统一的观点,需要法律和司法解释对其予以明确。《标准》在刑事立法和司法实践中存在刑法对损伤程度规定不明,重新鉴定难,诊疗资料的审查与使用不规范,鉴定意见审查质证流于形式等问题,针对上述问题笔者提出对应的解决和完善建议。
[Abstract]:The "Standard of the degree of Human injury" is the legal standard for the evaluation of the degree of human injury. The opinion on the degree of injury of the human body promotes the development of the criminal procedure. It is of great significance to determine the legal facts of personal injury cases and to ensure the justice of the judicial results. The standard of human body injury identification is the supporting technical norm of the Criminal Law and other laws and regulations, and it is the judgment of crime and non-crime, this crime and that crime. Misdemeanor and felony, the important basis of incidental civil compensation and criminal reconciliation. In the sub-rule of the Criminal Law, there are as many as 40 articles concerning human injury, and the applicable frequency and scope of "Standard" are high and wide. In the practice of criminal justice, The rate of acceptance of an opinion on the degree of injury in the trial was close to 100, and the judge relied too much on the opinion of the degree of human injury. 98711 judgments involving the determination of the degree of injury were retrieved from the Chinese judicial documents online. The author thinks that the standard is a mandatory standard with the nature of judicial interpretation, only one standard for the identification of minor injuries, minor injuries, and serious injuries. The legal status of the standard for the identification of human injury is still controversial in academic circles. In criminal legislation and judicial practice, the criminal law has unclear regulations on the degree of injury, it is difficult to re-identify, the examination and use of diagnostic and therapeutic materials is not standardized. The appraisal opinion examines the question of cross-examination in the form, and puts forward the corresponding solution and consummation suggestion in view of the above problems.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D919.4

【参考文献】