超声造影对小肝癌多电极冷循环射频消融的近期疗效评估
发布时间:2018-07-29 06:12
【摘要】:目的探讨应用CEUS评估多电极冷循环射频消融(RFA)治疗小肝癌后肿瘤灭活程度的价值。方法对49例小肝癌患者(63处病灶)RFA治疗前后分别进行常规超声、CEUS检查及增强CT检查,评估病灶完全消融及局部残留情况。结果 RFA治疗前,CEUS测量病灶最大径为(2.47±0.53)cm,常规超声测值为(2.12±0.57)cm,二者差异有统计学意义(t=-4.907,P0.05)。CEUS测量病灶面积为(6.50±1.26)cm2,常规超声测值为(5.43±1.06)cm2,差异有统计学意义(t=-6.867,P0.05)。CEUS与增强CT对病灶检出率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.25,P0.05)。RFA治疗后,CEUS判断肿瘤完全灭活与局部残留情况与增强CT差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.50,P0.05)。结论 CEUS可用于评估小肝癌RFA治疗效果。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the value of CEUS in the evaluation of tumor inactivation after multi-electrode cold circulation radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods 49 patients with small liver cancer (63 lesions) were examined by conventional ultrasound CEUs and enhanced CT before and after RFA treatment to evaluate the complete ablation and local residual of the lesions. Results before RFA treatment, the maximum diameter of lesions measured by CEUs was (2.47 卤0.53) cm and that by conventional ultrasound was (2.12 卤0.57) cm. There was a significant difference between CEUS and enhanced CT in detecting lesion area (6.50 卤1.26) cm ~ (2) and conventional ultrasound (5.43 卤1.06) cm ~ (2), respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of tumor inactivation and local residual after RFA treatment (蠂 2 / 0.25 P 0.05). There was no significant difference between CEUs and enhanced CT (蠂 2 / 0.50 P 0.05). Conclusion CEUS can be used to evaluate the efficacy of RFA in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.
【作者单位】: 郑州大学人民医院;河南省人民医院超声科;
【分类号】:R445.1;R735.7;R730.44
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the value of CEUS in the evaluation of tumor inactivation after multi-electrode cold circulation radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods 49 patients with small liver cancer (63 lesions) were examined by conventional ultrasound CEUs and enhanced CT before and after RFA treatment to evaluate the complete ablation and local residual of the lesions. Results before RFA treatment, the maximum diameter of lesions measured by CEUs was (2.47 卤0.53) cm and that by conventional ultrasound was (2.12 卤0.57) cm. There was a significant difference between CEUS and enhanced CT in detecting lesion area (6.50 卤1.26) cm ~ (2) and conventional ultrasound (5.43 卤1.06) cm ~ (2), respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of tumor inactivation and local residual after RFA treatment (蠂 2 / 0.25 P 0.05). There was no significant difference between CEUs and enhanced CT (蠂 2 / 0.50 P 0.05). Conclusion CEUS can be used to evaluate the efficacy of RFA in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.
【作者单位】: 郑州大学人民医院;河南省人民医院超声科;
【分类号】:R445.1;R735.7;R730.44
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 丁建民;经翔;王彦冬;刘艳丽;高磊;;超声造影在肝细胞肝癌射频治疗中的应用[J];中国介入影像与治疗学;2011年01期
2 陈红健;张一心;陈钟;;超声造影配合射频消融与手术治疗原发性小肝癌的疗效比较[J];江苏医药;2012年01期
3 陈敏华,戴莹,严昆,杨薇,吴薇,李吉友,张晓鹏,尹珊珊;超声造影对肝硬化合并小肝癌的早期诊断价值[J];中华超声影像学杂志;2005年02期
4 董宝玮,梁萍,于晓玲,余锋,苏莉,于德江,张晶;超声引导微波凝固治疗原发性肝癌——附120例临床疗效分析[J];中华超声影像学杂志;1999年04期
5 陈敏山,李锦清,梁惠宏,林小军,郭荣平,郑云,张亚奇;经皮射频消融与手术切除治疗小肝癌的疗效比较[J];中华医学杂志;2005年02期
6 梁萍;董宝玮;于晓玲;于德江;冯蕾;高永艳;王e,
本文编号:2151785
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yixuelunwen/yundongyixue/2151785.html
最近更新
教材专著