东方哲学的学理建构——以徐梵澄“精神哲学”的考察为基础

发布时间：2017-12-28 13:04

本文关键词：东方哲学的学理建构——以徐梵澄“精神哲学”的考察为基础　出处：《贵州社会科学》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：东方哲学的学理建构在逻辑上优先于学科发展,也是东方文化圈内具体门类哲学研究的一般性架构。徐梵澄先生在译介印度近现代圣哲阿罗频多著作的同时,通过序言、疏释、案语等方式以中国哲学思想参会其间,发展了阿罗频多综合古希腊哲学、印度哲学所创建的"精神哲学"的意涵。并以精神哲学一脉的视角凸显宋明理学的阐发和弘扬。徐先生依托具体文本跨文化参会互证、彰显异同,并且在东西方比较的角度对中印文化的共通性进行了提炼和概括。在此意义上,他对"精神哲学"的界定调整了西方哲学史为脉络的"哲学"定义,为东方哲学赋予了实质性的学理内涵。
[Abstract]:The theoretical construction of Oriental philosophy is logically preceded by the development of the subject, and it is also a general framework for the study of specific category philosophy in the eastern cultural circle. Mr. Xu Fancheng in the translation of modern India Rishi Aurobindo's works at the same time, through the introduction and explanation and comment etc. to Chinese philosophy during the development of the participants, Aurobindo comprehensive ancient Greek philosophy, philosophy of India to create a "spiritual philosophy" meaning. And with the spirit of philosophy from the perspective of a prominent Neo Confucianism "and promote. Mr. Xu relies on specific texts to intercultural mutual participation, highlights similarities and differences, and refines and summarizes the commonality between Chinese and Indian cultures from the perspective of eastern and Western comparison. In this sense, his definition of "spiritual philosophy" has adjusted the definition of "philosophy" in the history of western philosophy, which gives the Oriental philosophy substantial academic connotation.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院;
【分类号】：B1
【正文快照】： 检讨东方哲学的学理内涵是当代学人研究东方地域范围内传统思想不可回避的理论问题。对东方哲学学理内涵的讨论首先会碰到类似中国哲学合法性证明的困境。但是,更加根本的问题还是对哲学本身的界定。现代学术体制和学术训练使得传统东方文化的研究无法脱离先天带来的西方哲学

【相似文献】