儒道互补与建设性后现代主义比较研究
发布时间:2017-12-31 09:02
本文关键词:儒道互补与建设性后现代主义比较研究 出处:《哈尔滨工业大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:儒道互补作为中国传统文化的主要特征,是中国人的精神体现和古代的思想现象。认识到儒家和道家思想上的互补性和相通性是必要的。同时,作为当今世界上主要思潮之一的建设性后现代主义,在一定程度上与儒家思想和道家思想具有相似性,很多学者也为此进行了很多研究,但对中国传统文化的重要特征儒道互补与建设性后现代主义之间的研究甚少,因而,本文的重点在于将儒道互补作为整个研究,通过和建设性后现代主义的比较分析,得出两者之间具有的相似性或者相通性。本文的研究目的在于借助建设性后现代主义消除西方对中国文化特别是儒道互补的误解,为传播中国传统文化提供一条新的路径。儒道互补与建设性后现代主义一样,都诞生于社会危机和思想危机之中,他们在前人思想的基础上,批判继承从而建立起自己的学说,为解决社会危机和思想危机提供新的途径。可以说,两者是人类思维发展的必然结果。儒道互补和建设性后现代主义在哲学本体论上也具有相似性和共通性。儒道思想都继承了“道”的思想,全面深化了“道”作为宇宙本原的内涵意义。而“道”的生成变化是与建设性后现代主义中的怀特海过程关系哲学中的“过程”概念具有相似性,从而使两者在哲学上共通。儒道互补思想与建设性后现代主义在社会政治方面也有相融之处。儒道互补思想将人视为关系中的人,通过统治者的视角阐释如何通过“无为”实现对治理百姓以及调节人与人之间的关系;同样,在建设性后现代主义理论中,基于广义经验论提出的共情主义,以及由此产生的道义民主思想都可以和儒道互补的社会政治思想相互融合,其交融之处在于对于人的本质认识是相同的,即人是关系中的人,情是关系建立的基础。总之两者之间关系密切,相互融通。因而,儒道互补可以借助建设性后现代主义向世界传播中国传统文化思想,可以借鉴其有益的思想内涵发展自己的哲学理论和社会政治思想,实现时代性发展。这也是本文的创新之处。
[Abstract]:Confucianism and Taoism as the main feature China of traditional culture, is Chinese embodies the spirit and thoughts of ancient phenomenon. Aware of Confucianism and Taoism on the complementarities and similarities is necessary. At the same time, as the construction of one of the world's main trend of postmodernism, to a certain extent with Confucianism and Taoism have similar ideas, many scholars have conducted a lot of research, but the research between the important characteristics and construction of Chinese Confucianism and Taoism traditional culture of postmodernism is very little, therefore, the focus of this paper will complement the Confucianism as a whole to study, through comparative analysis and constructive postmodernism, or is that is the similarity between the two. The purpose of this study is to use constructive postmodernism to eliminate western especially the misunderstanding of Chinese complementation of Confucianism and Taoism culture, for the dissemination of China Provide a new path for traditional culture. Confucianism and Taoism and constructive postmodernism, born in the social crisis and ideological crisis, they are based on previous ideas, criticism and inheritance so as to establish their own theory, provide a new way to solve the social crisis and ideological crisis. It can be said that the two are the inevitable result of the development of human thinking. The complementation and constructive postmodernism in philosophy ontology is similar and common. Confucianism and Taoism have inherited the thought of "Tao", deepen the "Tao" as the origin of the universe and the connotation of meaning. "Generation change" is similar with the relationship between Whitehead and the process of constructive postmodernism in philosophy of "process" concept, so that the two common in philosophy. Confucianism and Taoism thought and constructive postmodernism in social politics is also. Place. Complementation of Confucianism and Taoism will be regarded as the relationship between the people, through the interpretation of the ruler's perspective on how to through the "Wuwei" to realize the relationship between governance and regulation of people and people; similarly, in the construction of post-modern theory, generalized empirical theory based on the principle of empathy, and the resulting moral thought of democracy can and complementation of Confucianism and Taoism's social and political thoughts of mutual integration, the integration of human nature lies in the understanding is the same, which is in the relationship between people, love is the basis of relationship building. In the close relationship between the two, mutual financing. Therefore, complementation of Confucianism and Taoism can make use of constructive postmodernism spread to the world Chinese the idea of traditional culture, can draw lessons from the connotation of development of their own philosophy and social and political thought, the realization of the times development. This is the innovation of this paper.
【学位授予单位】:哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:B089.1;B22
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 冯石岗;王洋;;道家“和合”思想和建设性后现代主义的古今呼应[J];四川工程职业技术学院学报;2013年03期
2 樊美筠;王治河;;第二次启蒙与文明对话的新使命[J];深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版);2013年06期
,本文编号:1359075
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/1359075.html