儒、法互补与传统中国的治理结构

发布时间：2017-12-31 23:23

  本文关键词：儒、法互补与传统中国的治理结构　出处：《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 国家治理 春秋战国时期 儒法互补

【摘要】：国家治理的能力和民意是国家稳定和延续的基本条件。春秋战国时期的儒家、法家分别继承了三代时期的王道与霸道,发展出强调民本的儒家学说和强调权势的法家学派。儒家偏重国家的民意基础而相对缺乏治理效能,不能成为诸侯争霸的思想指导;法家偏重君王治理能力而缺乏民意对君权的制约,最终导致秦帝国的暴政和快速灭亡。汉代以后的国家治理希望实现民意与效能的结合,逐步形成了儒法互补、霸王杂之的治理结构,奠定了古代中国的国家治理体系。
[Abstract]:The ability of national governance and public opinion are the basic conditions for the stability and continuation of the country. In the Spring and Autumn and warring States period Confucianism Legalists inherited three generations of kingship and hegemony respectively. The Confucian school which emphasizes the people and the law school emphasizes the power. The Confucianists pay more attention to the public opinion base of the country and lack the efficiency of governance, so they can not become the ideological guidance of vassals fighting for hegemony. The rule of law emphasizes on the ability of the monarch and lacks the restriction of public opinion on the monarchy, which eventually leads to the tyranny and rapid destruction of the Qin Empire. After the Han Dynasty, the government of the country hoped to realize the combination of public opinion and efficiency, and gradually formed the complementary of Confucianism and law. Overlord miscellaneous governance structure, laid the ancient China's national governance system.
【作者单位】： 湖南大学岳麓书院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目(15AZD032)
【分类号】：B222;B226
【正文快照】： “治理”原来是一个政治经济学概念,后来被引申到公共管理学、政治学领域。治理理论主要创始人之一詹姆斯·N.罗西瑙指出:“与统治不同,治理指的是一种由共同的目标支持的活动,这些管理活动的主体未必是政府,也无须依靠国家的强制力量来实现。换句话说,与政府统治相比,治理的，

本文编号：1361932