殷海光思想转变的“回归”论置疑

发布时间：2018-01-01 07:09

本文关键词：殷海光思想转变的“回归”论置疑　出处：《史学月刊》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：殷海光的一生经历了从坚定地坚持逻辑经验论和自由主义到转而喜欢中国传统文化的过程。相关研究应该以殷海光为中心,着重从其个性、道德情感、逻辑学家身份、病中文献资料以及林毓生、陈鼓应等人物进行考察。在其思想转变的原因中,殷海光安身立命的中国传统和东方情调的赤子心灵是根本,逻辑经验论等西方文化的不尽人意既是刺激因素也是技术条件,其他人和事只是起到一定促进作用。以"回归"中国传统文化为问题讨论殷海光的思想转变,其实是沿袭"非西即中"或"中西融合"的俗套。殷海光思想的转变并不存在离开和"回归"的问题;也不能被意会为"回归",因为它无法"回归"为价值倾向;也不能说是回归"中国传统文化",他只是从反传统主义者转变为非传统主义者。否定"回归"的观点,可以摆脱中西文化关系的俗套,跳出线性思想的格局。
[Abstract]:Yin Haiguang's life has experienced a process from insisting firmly on logical empiricism and liberalism to turning to like Chinese traditional culture. The related research should focus on Yin Haiguang's personality and moral emotion. The identity of the logician, the literature of the disease, Lin Yusheng, Chen Guying and other figures to investigate. In the reason of his thought change, Yin Haiguang's Chinese tradition and oriental sentiment are the fundamental. The unsatisfactory western culture, such as logical empiricism, is not only a stimulating factor but also a technical condition, and other people and things only play a certain role in promoting the ideological change of Yin Haiguang. In fact, it is a clich 茅 of "non-west is middle" or "Chinese and Western fusion". The change of Yin Haiguang's thought does not exist the problem of leaving and "returning". Nor can it be meant to be "return", because it cannot "return" to the tendency of value; It can not be said that he is returning to "Chinese traditional culture", he is only changing from anti-traditionalist to non-traditionalist, negating the viewpoint of "return", can get rid of the cliche of the relationship between Chinese and western culture, and jump out of the pattern of linear thought.
【作者单位】：河南大学经济学院博士后流动站;河南大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：B261
【正文快照】： 殷海光是20世纪五六十年代台湾最有影响的知识分子之一,在20世纪中国思想史上有着重要地位。逻辑经验论和自由主义是他学术思想的两大支撑。1967年4月22日,殷海光因胃部不适到医院检查出胃癌后便进行了手术,并于1969年9月16日因癌症复发而去世。在“病中的这段时间,凡是和他深

【相似文献】