从先荀后孟之说看汉唐荀孟关系以及荀子在儒学中的地位

发布时间：2018-01-03 15:05

本文关键词：从先荀后孟之说看汉唐荀孟关系以及荀子在儒学中的地位　出处：《社会科学》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：先荀后孟之说从汉至唐一直存在。此种与两人时间顺序相悖之说,当然显示荀子的重要性。在整个西汉,荀子影响总体上大于孟子影响。从东汉至唐代,两人影响各有千秋或旗鼓相当。汉代有对孟子的各种批评,但几乎没有对荀子的批评。宋明时盛行以孟子为儒家正统而以荀子为异端或准异端,这确实为大多数汉唐人所无法想象。在先荀后孟说之中,可看到与程朱道统说不同的、凸显荀子地位的道统说,其中"周孔荀孟"说尤其值得注意。荀学确实为汉唐显学。荀孟后学各自势力、两家思想差异等都可为先荀后孟说之出现提供解释。
[Abstract]:The theory of Xunhou and Mencius existed from Han to Tang Dynasty. This theory, contrary to the chronological order of the two, of course showed the importance of Xunzi. In the whole Western Han Dynasty, Xunzi's influence was generally greater than that of Mencius. From the Eastern Han Dynasty to the Tang Dynasty, Xunzi's influence was greater than that of Mencius. There were various criticisms of Mencius in the Han Dynasty, but there was almost no criticism of Xunzi. In Song and Ming dynasties, Mencius was regarded as Confucian orthodoxy and Xunzi as heresy or quasi-heresy. This is indeed unimaginable for most people in Han and Tang dynasties. In the words of Xun and Meng in the past, we can see the Taoist theory, which is different from that of Cheng and Zhu, and highlights the status of Xunzi. Among them, the theory of Zhou Kong Xunmeng is particularly noteworthy. Xunzi School is indeed a prominent study in the Han and Tang dynasties. The differences between the two schools of thought can provide an explanation for the emergence of the former Xunxunhou Mencius theory.
【作者单位】：华南师范大学政治与行政学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国人性论通史”(项目编号:15ZDB004);国家社会科学基金项目“荀学新探:以性朴论为中心”(项目编号:13BZX043)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：B222
【正文快照】： 我们早已习惯先孟后荀之说(“孟荀”)。在时间上,孟子在前而荀子在后,故这种说法很自然。不过,本文试图探讨相反之说:先荀后孟(“荀孟”),这种似乎不自然的说法别有深意。研究此种说法可对孟荀关系或荀孟关系产生新看法,也可对汉唐儒学史产生新看法。荀孟关系、荀子在儒学中

【相似文献】