智慧的实践之维与哲学史的写法——对冯契哲学思想的一点分析

发布时间：2018-01-08 13:14

本文关键词：智慧的实践之维与哲学史的写法——对冯契哲学思想的一点分析　出处：《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："智慧"是冯契思想中用以联系其哲学史写作和哲学创作的津梁,同时又在这两种写作中有重要区别。在其以《中国古代哲学的逻辑发展》为代表的哲学史写作中,冯契主要在"具体真理"的意义上探讨了智慧;而在以"智慧说三篇"为代表的哲学创作中,他则是在"具体真理"与"具体人格"之内在结合的意义上探讨了智慧。前者是智慧的思辨形态,后者则显示了智慧的实践之维。对智慧之理解的上述差异造成了冯契哲学史写作和哲学创作之间的张力,同时也是当代讨论中对冯契的分裂评价的根源之一。在冯契之后,再写哲学史的一个可能方向,是综合智慧的思辨与实践两重品格,其关键的方法论问题是论证与解释、"纯化"与"泛化"、批判与同情之结合。
[Abstract]:"Wisdom" is the link between Feng Qi's philosophy history writing and philosophy creation. At the same time, there are important differences between the two kinds of writing. In his writing on the history of philosophy, represented by "the Logic Development of Ancient Chinese philosophy", Feng Qi mainly discusses wisdom in the sense of "concrete truth". In the philosophical creation represented by "three articles on Wisdom", he explored wisdom in the sense of combination of "concrete Truth" and "specific Personality", the former being the speculative form of wisdom. The latter shows the practical dimension of wisdom, and the above differences in understanding wisdom result in the tension between Feng Qi's history of philosophy writing and philosophical creation. At the same time, it is also one of the root causes of the split evaluation of Feng Qi in the contemporary discussion. After Feng Qi, a possible direction of writing the history of philosophy is the character of thinking and practice of comprehensive wisdom. The key methodological problems are argumentation and explanation, purification and generalization, criticism and sympathy.
【作者单位】：上海社会科学院哲学研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“冯契哲学文献整理及思想研究”(15ZDB012) 教育部人文社会科学基地重大项目“通过—超过:古今中西之争视域下的冯契哲学研究”(16JJD720005)
【分类号】：B26
【正文快照】： 在当代中国的思想讨论中,冯契先生扮演着两个不同的角色。在哲学创作领域,他似乎成为某种意义上的先知,“代表了一种现代中国哲学发展应取的方向”(1);而在哲学史研究领域,他则似乎是进行着“前现代”写作的落伍者(2)。这种分裂的形象与冯契本人对其哲学创作和哲学史写作之统

【相似文献】