康德对传统经验概念的重构及其知识论价值

发布时间：2018-01-10 09:37

本文关键词：康德对传统经验概念的重构及其知识论价值　出处：《学术论坛》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：科学知识起源于经验是传统经验论的基本观点,但偶然性和主观性的经验如何为具有普遍性与客观性特征的科学知识提供辩护,成为经验论者必须解决的认识论难题。康德通过重构传统的经验概念,将知性的自发性纳入经验之中,认为经验是感性的接受性与知性的自发性相结合的产物,由此走出了怀疑主义的窠臼,确保了科学知识的合理性和有效性。虽然康德的经验概念存在二元化的思维倾向,但他关于经验概念的重新梳理对于麦克道尔解决知识辩护的问题,走出所予论与融贯论循环的困境提供了理论借鉴。
[Abstract]:The origin of scientific knowledge from experience is the basic viewpoint of traditional empiricism, but the experience of contingency and subjectivity provides a defense for the scientific knowledge with the characteristics of universality and objectivity. By reconstructing the traditional concept of experience, Kant brings the spontaneity of knowledge into the experience, and thinks that experience is the product of the combination of perceptual receptivity and intellectual spontaneity. In this way, we get out of the scepticism and ensure the rationality and validity of scientific knowledge, although Kant's concept of experience has a dualistic thinking tendency. But his rearrangement of the concept of experience provides a theoretical reference for McDowell to solve the problem of knowledge defense and to get out of the dilemma of the circle of theory and theory.
【作者单位】：山东师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“麦克道尔哲学与新实用主义的叙事转换研究”(14CZX037)
【分类号】：B516.31
【正文快照】： 近代经验主义和理性主义关于科学知识的来源、范围、可能性和确证标准等问题的解答分歧不断、莫衷一是,使传统哲学不仅在认识论上无法证实科学知识的普遍必然性和客观有效性,导致启蒙主义提倡科学、崇尚理性、推进知识的理想落空,而且使传统形而上学无法证明自身的科学性,导致

【相似文献】