梁启超关于颜李学研究的路径及其逻辑演进过程

发布时间：2018-01-10 15:23

  本文关键词：梁启超关于颜李学研究的路径及其逻辑演进过程　出处：《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 颜李学 梁启超 理学 实用主义

【摘要】：作为民国颜李学研究之开拓者,梁启超在"中国文艺复兴"的内在诉求和"理学反动"的解释框架之下,对颜李学的理解经历了从"新旧过渡"与"兼反汉宋"到"清学支流"与"实用主义代表"的演进过程。尤其是1923年后,他更追逐时趋,引入杜威实用主义学说,一方面把颜李二人再塑成反理学的思想家,并将其二人置于清代反理学谱系中的开端,从而奠定了他们于清代思想史中革命派的角色和地位;另一方面梁以西释中,彰显出颜李学教育思想的现代价值,将该领域研究引入新天地。梁氏之研究虽存在诸多偏颇之处,但在当时民国学界产生了不小的示范意义。
[Abstract]:As the pioneer of the study of Yan Li in the Republic of China, Liang Qichao is under the inner appeal of "Chinese Renaissance" and the frame of "Neo-Confucianism reactionary". The understanding of Yan Lixue has gone through the evolution from "the transition between old and new" and "anti-Han and Song" to "branch of Qing school" and "representative of pragmatism". Especially after 1923, he pursued the trend of the times. By introducing Dewey's pragmatism theory, on the one hand, Yan and Li were re-formed into a thinker of anti-Confucianism, and they were placed in the beginning of the anti-Confucianism pedigree of the Qing Dynasty. Thus, the role and status of revolutionaries in the history of the Qing Dynasty ideology were established. On the other hand, Liang Xi-shizhong reveals the modern value of Yan Li's educational thought, and introduces the research in this field into the new world. Although there are many biased points in Liang's research. But at that time, the academic circles of the Republic of China had not small demonstration significance.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学马克思主义学院;
【分类号】：B249.5;B259.1
【正文快照】： (1)详见丘为君:《戴震学的形成:知识论在近代中国的诞生》,北京:新星出版社2006年版,第218—221页。(2)国内外学者对于梁启超的颜李学研究,已有一些涉及,如宋立卿、解成:《颜元思想在近代中国的命运》,《河北史学会通讯——全国颜元李Xh学术思想讨论会专号》(总第十一期),内部，

本文编号：1405785