哲学或实证科学:论张岱年与叶青的“新唯物论”性质之争

发布时间：2018-01-12 21:34

本文关键词：哲学或实证科学:论张岱年与叶青的“新唯物论”性质之争　出处：《毛泽东思想研究》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从理论性质上将马克思主义把握为哲学抑或实证科学,乃是张岱年与叶青在思想上的根本分歧。对前者而言,将"新唯物论"经验化、实证化的后果既背离了马克思主义的批判向度,也错失了中国哲学精神重建的现实需要。因此,有必要反驳叶青的"哲学消灭论"和"哲学抹杀论",并进而去清算产生这些荒诞观念的思想前提,以为澄清"新唯物论"与哲学、"新唯物论"与哲学史和"新唯物论"与哲学问题之间的关系铺平道路。张岱年对马克思主义之为哲学的强调源于其对人的"形上本性"的洞见,他将叶青之学说视作教条主义和旧唯物论在中国的典型个案,提出了要在"新唯物论"的民族化进程中来重新定向马克思主义哲学之唯物主义基础的必要性与重要意义。
[Abstract]:To grasp Marxism as philosophy or empirical science in terms of theoretical nature is the fundamental difference between Zhang Dainian and Ye Qing in their thoughts. For the former, the "new materialism" should be empirically transformed. The result of positivization deviates from the critical direction of Marxism and the realistic need of the reconstruction of Chinese philosophy spirit. Therefore, it is necessary to refute Ye Qing's "philosophical annihilation theory" and "philosophical annihilation theory". And then to clear up the ideological premise of these absurd ideas, in order to clarify "new materialism" and philosophy. The relationship between "New materialism" and the history of philosophy and between "New materialism" and philosophical problems paves the way. Zhang Dainian's emphasis on Marxist philosophy stems from his insight into man's "metaphysical nature". He regards Ye Qing's theory as a typical case of dogmatism and old materialism in China. The necessity and significance of reorienting the materialistic basis of Marxist philosophy in the process of nationalization of "New materialism" are put forward.
【作者单位】：黄冈师范学院马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“历史唯物主义与古典经济学理论传承关系研究”(15CZX004)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：B27
【正文快照】： 一直以来,思想界和学术界对马克思主义哲学的理论性质问题存在争议,这其中不仅有马克思主义者和非马克思主义者的对垒,而且还有马克思主义阵营内部的分歧。大体而言,论战的焦点主要围绕以下几个方面展开:一是如何看待马克思、恩格斯提出的“历史科学”概念,即探讨马克思主义同

【相似文献】