道统、道学与政治立法

发布时间：2018-01-12 23:04

本文关键词：道统、道学与政治立法　出处：《中国哲学史》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：余英时先生在《朱熹的历史世界》一书中对朱子的"道统—道学之辨"进行了重构,指出朱子那里存在着道统与道学的严格区分:道统是孔子之前的有德有位的圣王之间相传的谱系,而孔子有德无位,只能开创道学却未能继承道统。然而,他的这一重构与朱子的本意相距甚远。对朱子而言,道统是道学的传授谱系,道学是道统的传承内容。而道学的具体内容则是一套实现内圣的修养工夫,同时也是历代圣贤相传的治理天下的"密旨"、"心法"。在位的人君作为统治者,只有按照这一套工夫系统进行自我修养,才能够通过内圣的修养实现外王的政治理想。因此,朱子对道统与道学的论述包含着对在位的人君进行政治立法的诉求。
[Abstract]:Yu Yingshi reconstructs Zhu Zi's "the debate of Taoism" in "the Historical World of Zhu Xi". It is pointed out that there is a strict distinction between Taoism and Taoism: Taoism is a pedigree passed down between the noble kings with virtue and throne before Confucius, and Confucius has no place, but can only initiate Taoism but fail to inherit Taoism. However. For Zhu, Taoism is the teaching pedigree of Taoism, and Taoism is the inheritance content of Taoism, and the concrete content of Taoism is a set of accomplishment time to realize inner sanctity. At the same time, it is also the "secret purpose" and "heart method" of ruling the world from the sages and sages. As rulers, the reigning people and monarchs only carry on self-cultivation according to this set of time system. Therefore, Zhu Zi's exposition on Taoism and Taoism contains the pursuit of political legislation for the ruling people and monarchs.
【作者单位】：陕西师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国与世界:古今中西之争视域下世界历史叙述的重建”(项目编号:16JJD720006) 陕西省社会科学基金项目“朱熹哲学的内在体系研究”(立项号:2016C006) 中国博士后第60批科研资助二等资助项目“价值立场与哲理基础:朱熹儒佛之辨研究”(项目编号:2016M602765)
【分类号】：B244.7
【正文快照】： 一、引言如所周知,余英时先生在其《朱熹的历史世界》一书中重构了“道统—道学之辨”,在他看来,朱子那里存在着道统与道学的严格区分,而朱子对这一区分有着明确的思想自觉:朱熹有意将“道统”与道学划分为两个历史阶段:自“上古圣神”至周公是“道统”的时代,其最显著的特征

【相似文献】