原始儒家“性与天道”问题的现象学还原——以孔子与子贡的形上学探讨为例

发布时间：2018-01-15 00:08

本文关键词：原始儒家“性与天道”问题的现象学还原——以孔子与子贡的形上学探讨为例　出处：《湖北经济学院学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在言说与解读之间,有着一个巨大的须填充的空间。借助现象学、语言哲学的问题意识,以通达并填充这一空间,也许可以对相关问题获致一定程度的"正解"。子贡"得闻夫子之文章"而"不得闻夫子之言性与天道",他之所惑,实为儒门千古一惑。对这一事关形上学探讨中的纠结,历来解说纷纭。如果从语言哲学视角进行"现象学还原",由概念的讨论回溯到"事实本身",我们似乎可以更好地呈现原始儒家在"性与天道"问题上所存在的形上追问的困境。在还原"子贡式困惑"的"自身被给予性"过程中,我们似可发现困惑产生的原因,即既由于孔子特殊的启导方法,又由于远比孔子小的子贡及门太晚,资质所限,等等。
[Abstract]:There is a huge space to be filled between speech and interpretation. With the help of phenomenology and the problem consciousness of linguistic philosophy, we can reach and fill this space. Perhaps we can get a certain degree of "positive solution" to the related problems. Zigong "heard the article of the Master" and "not to hear the nature of the teacher and the Tao of Heaven", he was confused. In fact, Confucianism is a puzzle from ages to ages. There are always different interpretations of the entanglement concerning metaphysics. If the "phenomenological restoration" is carried out from the perspective of linguistic philosophy, the discussion of the concept can be traced back to "fact itself". It seems that we can better present the dilemma of the primitive Confucianism on the question of "sex and the Tao of heaven", and in the process of restoring the "self-giving nature" of "Zigong style confusion". It seems that we can find the cause of confusion, that is, because of Confucius' special method of guidance, and because the Zi Gong, which is far smaller than Confucius, is too late, the qualification is limited, and so on.
【作者单位】：湖北经济学院;
【基金】：湖北省教育厅人文社科重点项目(16D078)
【分类号】：B222.1
【正文快照】： 在言说与解读之间有着一个巨大的须填充的空间,这个空间在《论语》文本中孔门师徒之间以及在历来的读者同《论语》文本之间都是存在的。子贡“得闻夫子之文章”而“不得闻夫子之言性与天道”,本文称这一有关儒学形上学的现象为“子贡式困惑”。对这一事关形上学探讨中的纠结,

【相似文献】