现代社会生存困境——《启蒙辩证法》的一种解读视角

发布时间：2018-01-17 18:14

本文关键词：现代社会生存困境——《启蒙辩证法》的一种解读视角　出处：《学术交流》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：发掘霍克海默和阿多尔诺对现代社会生存困境的深刻阐释是解读《启蒙辩证法》的一个重要切入点。厘清他们对现实困境的刻画和分析,才能反观其对意识形态的批判、对社会历史进程的预言以及更宏大的哲学设想。《启蒙辩证法》从英雄与水手的隐喻、人对自然献祭过程的转变、20世纪文化工业发展、犹太人大屠杀事件四个视角揭示了现代社会的生存困境及其产生的历史渊源和可能的救赎路径。其中关于技术理性与同一性哲学的批判、关于当权者与边缘人群的分析、关于审美与自由的探讨都值得在时下语境中反复品读。尽管在理论层面,霍克海默与阿多尔诺围绕技术理性批判和同一性哲学批判展开了多层论述,但在面对现实问题时,他们表现出一种回避、否定和逃离的态度,尤其忽视了辩证法所强调的对现实事物作肯定理解的一面。
[Abstract]:To explore Horkheimer and Adorno's profound interpretation of the plight of modern society is an important entry point to interpret Dialectics of Enlightenment and clarify their portrayal and analysis of the dilemma of reality. Only by criticizing ideology, predicting the course of social history and making a larger philosophical assumption, can the Dialectics of Enlightenment change from the metaphors of heroes and sailors to the process of man's sacrifice to nature. In 20th century, the development of cultural industry. The Holocaust incident reveals the plight of modern society, its historical origin and possible salvation path, including the criticism of the philosophy of technological rationality and identity. With regard to the analysis of those in power and the marginal groups, the discussion of aesthetics and freedom is worth reading repeatedly in the context of the present, although at the theoretical level. Horkheimer and Adorno focus on the criticism of technical rationality and the philosophical criticism of identity, but in the face of practical problems, they show an attitude of avoidance, negation and escape. In particular, the dialectics emphasizes the positive understanding of reality.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B516.59
【正文快照】： 《启蒙辩证法》一书中交织着多个主题。神话、自然、艺术及屠杀等丰富的内容支撑起全书庞杂而富有深度的论述。本书的发表与再版适逢20世纪上半叶各类思想激烈交锋之时,自启蒙运动以来不断高涨的技术乐观主义随着两次世界大战的爆发而急转直下,战后大众文化将古典艺术逐下神坛

【相似文献】