“自由儒学”纲要——现代自由诉求的儒家表达

发布时间：2018-01-19 07:21

本文关键词： 自由儒学现代自由传统儒学儒学传统　出处：《兰州学刊》2017年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国人对现代自由的诉求,亟需一种民族性的表达。然而,当代儒家往往错把前现代的"传统儒学"当作"儒学传统",导致至今还存在着儒学与现代自由的紧张。事实上,"传统儒学"是复数的,包含着各种不同形态的前现代儒学理论,其中并没有现代自由观念,尤其是皇权时代的儒学与现代自由之间存在着紧张;而"儒学传统"是单数的,是一以贯之、代代相传的一套儒学原理,其本身逻辑地蕴涵着现代自由。有鉴于此,"自由儒学"的路径选择是:批判地借鉴西方自由主义,同时批判地继承传统儒学理论。进而,"自由儒学"将通过追溯自由之源,重建儒家超越性的形上自由,建构儒家现代性的形下自由,由此呈现为"本源自由(自由之源)→良知自由(形上自由)→政治自由(形下自由)"的三层观念体系。
[Abstract]:The Chinese demand for modern freedom needs an expression of nationality. However, modern Confucianism often mistook the pre-modern "traditional Confucianism" as "Confucian tradition". So far, there is tension between Confucianism and modern freedom. In fact, "traditional Confucianism" is plural, including various forms of pre-modern Confucianism theory, in which there is no modern concept of freedom. In particular, there is tension between Confucianism and modern freedom in the imperial age. "Confucianism tradition" is singular, is a set of Confucian principles passed down from generation to generation, its own logical implication of modern freedom. The path of "free Confucianism" is to learn from western liberalism critically, and to inherit the traditional Confucian theory critically. Furthermore, "free Confucianism" will trace the source of freedom by tracing back to the source of freedom. Reconstructing Confucian transcendent freedom in form and constructing the freedom under form of Confucian modernity, thus presenting as "original freedom" (the source of freedom). 鈫扚reedom of conscience (freedom of form). 鈫扵he three-tier concept system of political freedom (freedom under form).
【作者单位】：山东社会科学院国际儒学研究与交流中心;
【分类号】：B222
【正文快照】： (1)参见郭萍:《“自由儒学”简论》《自由与境界——唐君毅心灵境界说解析》《儒家自由观念及其人性论基础》《超越传统儒学与现代自由的紧张及可能出路》等。另外,郭萍的博士学位论文《张君劢自由观研究》(山东大学2016年)明确提出现代新儒家张君劢是“自由儒学的先驱”,这是

【相似文献】